From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Raag Jadav" <raag.jadav@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 02/10] drm/xe/guc_submit: Introduce guc_exec_queue_reinit_kernel()
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 11:52:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260821115200.BB4601F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260821112436.545405-3-raag.jadav@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Unprotected modification of scheduler timeout in xe_sched_reinit() races with active TDR work, and drm_sched_is_stopped() assert will falsely trigger.
- [Medium] Layering violation: generic `xe_gpu_scheduler` component directly references GuC-specific `xe_guc_exec_queue` via downcast.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v10 02/10] drm/xe/guc_submit: Introduce guc_exec_queue_reinit_kernel() ---
commit 9c5abd285bbf057d5cc8df0e74c9cc1e73a4d283
Author: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
drm/xe/guc_submit: Introduce guc_exec_queue_reinit_kernel()
In preparation of usecases which require re-initializing GuC submission
after PCIe FLR, introduce guc_exec_queue_reinit_kernel() helper. This will
restore kernel queues which might have been killed before PCIe FLR.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.c
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -84,6 +88,19 @@ int xe_sched_init(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched,
> return drm_sched_init(&sched->base, &args);
> }
>
> +void xe_sched_reinit(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched)
> +{
> + struct xe_guc_exec_queue *ge = container_of(sched, struct xe_guc_exec_queue, sched);
[Severity: Medium]
Is it safe for the generic xe_gpu_scheduler component to directly downcast to
the GuC-specific xe_guc_exec_queue structure?
If xe_sched_reinit() is ever called by another submission backend (such as
execlists), couldn't this result in an invalid downcast and potential
memory corruption?
> +
> + xe_gt_assert(ge->q->gt, drm_sched_is_stopped(&sched->base));
> +
> + /*
> + * TODO: Implement drm_sched_reinit() instead of requiring the
> + * driver to restore individual fields.
> + */
> + sched->base.timeout = sched->timeout;
[Severity: High]
Will the drm_sched_is_stopped() assert falsely trigger during PCIe FLR?
During hardware resets like PCIe FLR, xe_guc_submit_pause_abort() executes on
kernel queues, calling xe_sched_submission_start() (which sets pause_submit to
false) and queuing TDR via guc_exec_queue_kill(). If xe_sched_reinit() is
later called on the same queue, the scheduler is no longer stopped, causing
this assert to fail.
Additionally, does modifying sched->base.timeout here race with the concurrent
TDR work (work_tdr)? Modifying it without calling cancel_delayed_work_sync()
might leave the TDR work executing with an inconsistent timeout state on a
re-initialized kernel queue.
> +}
> +
> void xe_sched_fini(struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched)
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260821112436.545405-1-raag.jadav@intel.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-21 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-21 11:23 [PATCH v10 00/10] Introduce Xe PCIe FLR Raag Jadav
2026-08-21 11:23 ` [PATCH v10 01/10] drm/xe/uc_fw: Allow re-initializing firmware Raag Jadav
2026-08-21 11:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 11:23 ` [PATCH v10 02/10] drm/xe/guc_submit: Introduce guc_exec_queue_reinit_kernel() Raag Jadav
2026-08-21 11:52 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-21 11:23 ` [PATCH v10 03/10] drm/xe/gt: Introduce FLR helpers Raag Jadav
2026-08-26 9:39 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-08-21 11:23 ` [PATCH v10 04/10] drm/xe/bo_evict: Introduce xe_bo_restore_map() Raag Jadav
2026-08-21 11:23 ` [PATCH v10 05/10] drm/xe/exec_queue: Introduce xe_exec_queue_reinit() Raag Jadav
2026-08-21 11:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 11:23 ` [PATCH v10 06/10] drm/xe/migrate: Introduce xe_migrate_reinit() Raag Jadav
2026-08-21 11:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 11:23 ` [PATCH v10 07/10] drm/xe/pm: Introduce xe_device_suspend/resume() Raag Jadav
2026-08-21 11:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 18:22 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-26 7:01 ` Raag Jadav
2026-08-21 11:23 ` [PATCH v10 08/10] drm/xe: Introduce temporary device wedging Raag Jadav
2026-08-21 11:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 14:30 ` Laguna, Lukasz
2026-08-24 16:08 ` Raag Jadav
2026-08-24 18:29 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-25 7:41 ` Raag Jadav
2026-08-21 11:23 ` [PATCH v10 09/10] drm/xe/pci: Introduce PCIe Function Level Reset Raag Jadav
2026-08-21 11:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 10:06 ` Laguna, Lukasz
2026-08-26 9:01 ` Raag Jadav
2026-08-26 9:52 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-08-26 11:38 ` Raag Jadav
2026-08-21 11:23 ` [PATCH v10 10/10] drm/xe/doc: Wire up PCI Error Handling Raag Jadav
2026-08-21 11:31 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Introduce Xe PCIe FLR (rev10) Patchwork
2026-08-21 11:33 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-08-21 12:37 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-08-21 14:38 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260821115200.BB4601F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.