From: Ivy Lopez <skunkolee@gmail.com>
To: pjw@kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu
Cc: alex@ghiti.fr, andrew.jones@oss.qualcomm.com,
conor.dooley@microchip.com, schwab@suse.de,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ivy Lopez <skunkolee@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] riscv: hwprobe: fix has_fpu() to require D extension only
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 08:20:34 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260825142034.31230-1-skunkolee@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260816003216.22534-1-skunkolee@gmail.com>
The kernel never supports F without D, since D depends on F. As such,
has_fpu() checking either extension with '||' is incorrect: it
reports FPU support when only F is present, which is not sufficient
for D-dependent state save/restore, and weakens
RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_FD semantics to "F or D" instead of "F and D".
Fix has_fpu() to check D only, which is equivalent to requiring both
extensions given the dependency. Revert the explicit F && D check in
sys_hwprobe.c back to calling has_fpu(), which is now correct.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221874
Suggested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Suggested-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Ivy Lopez <skunkolee@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Original v1 approach (explicit F && D check in sys_hwprobe.c) was a
no-op since F-without-D is structurally impossible. Per Conor and
Andreas, fix has_fpu() itself instead, checking D only. Revert the
sys_hwprobe.c change back to calling has_fpu().
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260816003216.22534-1-skunkolee@gmail.com
arch/riscv/include/asm/switch_to.h | 4 ++--
arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/switch_to.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/switch_to.h
index 0e71eb82f920..8186cda88e17 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/switch_to.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/switch_to.h
@@ -60,8 +60,8 @@ static inline void __switch_to_fpu(struct task_struct *prev,
static __always_inline bool has_fpu(void)
{
- return riscv_has_extension_likely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_f) ||
- riscv_has_extension_likely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_d);
+ /* D extension depends on F, so checking D alone is sufficient. */
+ return riscv_has_extension_likely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_d);
}
#else
static __always_inline bool has_fpu(void) { return false; }
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
index 7f91beb82a1c..1659d31fd288 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static void hwprobe_isa_ext0(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair,
u64 missing = 0;
pair->value = 0;
- if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, f) && riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, d))
+ if (has_fpu())
pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_FD;
if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, c))
--
2.55.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ivy Lopez <skunkolee@gmail.com>
To: pjw@kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu
Cc: alex@ghiti.fr, andrew.jones@oss.qualcomm.com,
conor.dooley@microchip.com, schwab@suse.de,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ivy Lopez <skunkolee@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] riscv: hwprobe: fix has_fpu() to require D extension only
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 08:20:34 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260825142034.31230-1-skunkolee@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260816003216.22534-1-skunkolee@gmail.com>
The kernel never supports F without D, since D depends on F. As such,
has_fpu() checking either extension with '||' is incorrect: it
reports FPU support when only F is present, which is not sufficient
for D-dependent state save/restore, and weakens
RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_FD semantics to "F or D" instead of "F and D".
Fix has_fpu() to check D only, which is equivalent to requiring both
extensions given the dependency. Revert the explicit F && D check in
sys_hwprobe.c back to calling has_fpu(), which is now correct.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221874
Suggested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Suggested-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Ivy Lopez <skunkolee@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Original v1 approach (explicit F && D check in sys_hwprobe.c) was a
no-op since F-without-D is structurally impossible. Per Conor and
Andreas, fix has_fpu() itself instead, checking D only. Revert the
sys_hwprobe.c change back to calling has_fpu().
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260816003216.22534-1-skunkolee@gmail.com
arch/riscv/include/asm/switch_to.h | 4 ++--
arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/switch_to.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/switch_to.h
index 0e71eb82f920..8186cda88e17 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/switch_to.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/switch_to.h
@@ -60,8 +60,8 @@ static inline void __switch_to_fpu(struct task_struct *prev,
static __always_inline bool has_fpu(void)
{
- return riscv_has_extension_likely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_f) ||
- riscv_has_extension_likely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_d);
+ /* D extension depends on F, so checking D alone is sufficient. */
+ return riscv_has_extension_likely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_d);
}
#else
static __always_inline bool has_fpu(void) { return false; }
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
index 7f91beb82a1c..1659d31fd288 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static void hwprobe_isa_ext0(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair,
u64 missing = 0;
pair->value = 0;
- if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, f) && riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, d))
+ if (has_fpu())
pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_FD;
if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, c))
--
2.55.0
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-25 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-16 0:32 [PATCH] riscv: hwprobe: require both F and D extensions for RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_FD Ivy Lopez
2026-08-16 0:32 ` Ivy Lopez
2026-08-17 14:14 ` Conor Dooley
2026-08-17 14:14 ` Conor Dooley
2026-08-17 21:15 ` Ivy Lopez
2026-08-17 21:15 ` Ivy Lopez
2026-08-18 9:45 ` Conor Dooley
2026-08-18 9:45 ` Conor Dooley
2026-08-18 10:19 ` Andreas Schwab
2026-08-18 10:19 ` Andreas Schwab
2026-08-25 14:20 ` Ivy Lopez [this message]
2026-08-25 14:20 ` [PATCH v2] riscv: hwprobe: fix has_fpu() to require D extension only Ivy Lopez
2026-08-25 17:11 ` Conor Dooley
2026-08-25 17:11 ` Conor Dooley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260825142034.31230-1-skunkolee@gmail.com \
--to=skunkolee@gmail.com \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=andrew.jones@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.