linux-next: Tree for Aug 21

linux-next: Tree for Aug 21

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1598 bytes --]

Hi all,

Changes since 20260820:

None.

Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 7073
 5989 files changed, 509370 insertions(+), 156446 deletions(-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have created today's linux-next tree at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
(patches at https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/next/ ).  If you
are tracking the linux-next tree using git, you should not use "git pull"
to do so as that will try to merge the new linux-next release with the
old one.  You should use "git fetch" and checkout or reset to the new
master.

You can see which trees have been included by looking in the Next/Trees
file in the source.  There is also the merge.log file in the Next
directory.  Between each merge, the tree was built with a defconfig
for arm64, an allmodconfig for x86_64, a multi_v7_defconfig for arm,
an arm64 build of various kselftests, a KUnit build and run on arm64,
and a native build of tools/perf.  After the final fixups (if any), I do
an x86_64 modules_install followed by builds for x86_64 allnoconfig,
arm64 allyesconfig, powerpc allnoconfig (32 and 64 bit),
ppc44x_defconfig and pseries_le_defconfig and i386, s390, sparc and
sparc64 defconfig and htmldocs.

Below is a summary of the state of the merge.

I am currently merging 429 trees (counting Linus' and 133 trees of bug
fix patches pending for the current release).

Stats about the size of the tree over time can be seen at
http://neuling.org/linux-next-size.html .

Thanks to Paul Gortmaker for triage and bug fixes.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 21 (drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.ko)

[Randy Dunlap]

On 8/21/26 8:32 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since 20260820:
> 
> None.
> 
> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 7073
>  5989 files changed, 509370 insertions(+), 156446 deletions(-)

on x86_64 allmodconfig:

WARNING: modpost: drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.ko: module uses symbol 'devm_iio_channel_get' from namespace 'IIO_CONSUMER', but does not import it.
WARNING: modpost: drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.ko: module uses symbol 'iio_read_channel_processed' from namespace 'IIO_CONSUMER', but does not import it.

-- 
~Randy

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 21 (drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.ko)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, August 24, 2026 9:15:16 PM CEST Randy Dunlap wrote:
> 
> On 8/21/26 8:32 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Changes since 20260820:
> > 
> > None.
> > 
> > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 7073
> >  5989 files changed, 509370 insertions(+), 156446 deletions(-)
> 
> on x86_64 allmodconfig:
> 
> WARNING: modpost: drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.ko: module uses symbol 'devm_iio_channel_get' from namespace 'IIO_CONSUMER', but does not import it.
> WARNING: modpost: drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.ko: module uses symbol 'iio_read_channel_processed' from namespace 'IIO_CONSUMER', but does not import it.

Does the appended patch address it?

Interestingly enough, it doesn't complain for me when I build the
thermal tree merged on top of the current mainline.

How exactly do you build it?

---
 drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.c
@@ -252,5 +252,6 @@ static struct platform_driver mbg_tm_dri
 };
 module_platform_driver(mbg_tm_driver);
 
+MODULE_IMPORT_NS("IIO_CONSUMER");
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("PMIC MBG Temperature monitor driver");
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 21 (drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.ko)

[Randy Dunlap]

On 8/25/26 6:27 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, August 24, 2026 9:15:16 PM CEST Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>> On 8/21/26 8:32 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20260820:
>>>
>>> None.
>>>
>>> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 7073
>>>  5989 files changed, 509370 insertions(+), 156446 deletions(-)
>>
>> on x86_64 allmodconfig:
>>
>> WARNING: modpost: drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.ko: module uses symbol 'devm_iio_channel_get' from namespace 'IIO_CONSUMER', but does not import it.
>> WARNING: modpost: drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.ko: module uses symbol 'iio_read_channel_processed' from namespace 'IIO_CONSUMER', but does not import it.
> 
> Does the appended patch address it?

Yes, the warnings are gone now. Thanks.

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>

> Interestingly enough, it doesn't complain for me when I build the
> thermal tree merged on top of the current mainline.
> 
> How exactly do you build it?

make O=xx64 allmodconfig
make O=xx64 -s all

> 
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.c |    1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.c
> @@ -252,5 +252,6 @@ static struct platform_driver mbg_tm_dri
>  };
>  module_platform_driver(mbg_tm_driver);
>  
> +MODULE_IMPORT_NS("IIO_CONSUMER");
>  MODULE_DESCRIPTION("PMIC MBG Temperature monitor driver");
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
~Randy

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 21 (drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.ko)

[Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)]

On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 6:20 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/25/26 6:27 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, August 24, 2026 9:15:16 PM CEST Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >>
> >> On 8/21/26 8:32 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Changes since 20260820:
> >>>
> >>> None.
> >>>
> >>> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 7073
> >>>  5989 files changed, 509370 insertions(+), 156446 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> on x86_64 allmodconfig:
> >>
> >> WARNING: modpost: drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.ko: module uses symbol 'devm_iio_channel_get' from namespace 'IIO_CONSUMER', but does not import it.
> >> WARNING: modpost: drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.ko: module uses symbol 'iio_read_channel_processed' from namespace 'IIO_CONSUMER', but does not import it.
> >
> > Does the appended patch address it?
>
> Yes, the warnings are gone now. Thanks.
>
> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>

Cool, thanks!

> > Interestingly enough, it doesn't complain for me when I build the
> > thermal tree merged on top of the current mainline.
> >
> > How exactly do you build it?
>
> make O=xx64 allmodconfig
> make O=xx64 -s all

OK

> > ---
> >  drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.c |    1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.c
> > @@ -252,5 +252,6 @@ static struct platform_driver mbg_tm_dri
> >  };
> >  module_platform_driver(mbg_tm_driver);
> >
> > +MODULE_IMPORT_NS("IIO_CONSUMER");
> >  MODULE_DESCRIPTION("PMIC MBG Temperature monitor driver");
> >  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> ~Randy

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 21 (drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.ko)

[Nathan Chancellor]

On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 03:27:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, August 24, 2026 9:15:16 PM CEST Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > 
> > On 8/21/26 8:32 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > Changes since 20260820:
> > > 
> > > None.
> > > 
> > > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 7073
> > >  5989 files changed, 509370 insertions(+), 156446 deletions(-)
> > 
> > on x86_64 allmodconfig:
> > 
> > WARNING: modpost: drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.ko: module uses symbol 'devm_iio_channel_get' from namespace 'IIO_CONSUMER', but does not import it.
> > WARNING: modpost: drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.ko: module uses symbol 'iio_read_channel_processed' from namespace 'IIO_CONSUMER', but does not import it.
> 
> Does the appended patch address it?
> 
> Interestingly enough, it doesn't complain for me when I build the
> thermal tree merged on top of the current mainline.

FWIW, I sent a fix for this two weeks ago that explains the semantic
conflict:

  https://lore.kernel.org/20260812-qcom-spmi-mbg-tm-ns-modpost-error-v1-1-d849390d2714@kernel.org/

You will only see it when the IIO tree is merged against the thermal
tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Nathan

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 21 (drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.ko)

[Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)]

On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 8:48 PM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 03:27:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, August 24, 2026 9:15:16 PM CEST Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > >
> > > On 8/21/26 8:32 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Changes since 20260820:
> > > >
> > > > None.
> > > >
> > > > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 7073
> > > >  5989 files changed, 509370 insertions(+), 156446 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > on x86_64 allmodconfig:
> > >
> > > WARNING: modpost: drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.ko: module uses symbol 'devm_iio_channel_get' from namespace 'IIO_CONSUMER', but does not import it.
> > > WARNING: modpost: drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.ko: module uses symbol 'iio_read_channel_processed' from namespace 'IIO_CONSUMER', but does not import it.
> >
> > Does the appended patch address it?
> >
> > Interestingly enough, it doesn't complain for me when I build the
> > thermal tree merged on top of the current mainline.
>
> FWIW, I sent a fix for this two weeks ago that explains the semantic
> conflict:
>
>   https://lore.kernel.org/20260812-qcom-spmi-mbg-tm-ns-modpost-error-v1-1-d849390d2714@kernel.org/
>
> You will only see it when the IIO tree is merged against the thermal
> tree.

I missed that one, thanks for the pointer!