From: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
Drew Fustini <fustini@kernel.org>,
Vikram Sethi <vsethi@nvidia.com>,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
Newton Liu <newtonl@nvidia.com>,
Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v2 09/19] fs/resctrl: Take memory hotplug lock whenever taking CPU hotplug lock
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 10:22:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831172245.42253-10-fenghuay@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831172245.42253-1-fenghuay@nvidia.com>
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
resctrl takes the read side CPU hotplug lock whenever it is working
with the list of domains. This prevents a CPU being brought online
and the list being modified while resctrl is walking the list, or
picking CPUs from the CPU masks.
If resctrl domains for CPU-less NUMA nodes are to be supported, this
would not be enough to prevent the domain list form being modified as
a NUMA node can come online with only memory.
Take the memory hotplug lock whenever the CPU hotplug lock is taken.
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
---
fs/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c | 3 +++
fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 13 +++++++++++++
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c b/fs/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c
index 17b99a075eaf..c865913cb534 100644
--- a/fs/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c
+++ b/fs/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/debugfs.h>
#include <linux/kthread.h>
+#include <linux/memory_hotplug.h>
#include <linux/mman.h>
#include <linux/pm_qos.h>
#include <linux/resctrl.h>
@@ -718,6 +719,7 @@ static int pseudo_lock_measure_cycles(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, int sel)
int ret = -1;
cpus_read_lock();
+ get_online_mems();
mutex_lock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
if (rdtgrp->flags & RDT_DELETED) {
@@ -765,6 +767,7 @@ static int pseudo_lock_measure_cycles(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, int sel)
out:
mutex_unlock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
+ put_online_mems();
cpus_read_unlock();
return ret;
}
diff --git a/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
index d60868f7d5e7..a16e35b587c4 100644
--- a/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
+++ b/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <linux/fs_parser.h>
#include <linux/sysfs.h>
#include <linux/kernfs.h>
+#include <linux/memory_hotplug.h>
#include <linux/once.h>
#include <linux/resctrl.h>
#include <linux/seq_buf.h>
@@ -3238,6 +3239,7 @@ struct rdtgroup *rdtgroup_kn_lock_live(struct kernfs_node *kn)
rdtgroup_kn_get(rdtgrp, kn);
cpus_read_lock();
+ get_online_mems();
mutex_lock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
rdt_last_cmd_clear();
@@ -3265,6 +3267,7 @@ void rdtgroup_kn_unlock(struct kernfs_node *kn)
return;
mutex_unlock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
+ put_online_mems();
cpus_read_unlock();
rdtgroup_kn_put(rdtgrp, kn);
@@ -3299,6 +3302,7 @@ bool info_kn_lock(struct kernfs_node *kn)
{
kernfs_break_active_protection(kn);
cpus_read_lock();
+ get_online_mems();
mutex_lock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
/*
@@ -3307,6 +3311,7 @@ bool info_kn_lock(struct kernfs_node *kn)
*/
if (!rdtgroup_default.kn || !is_active_resctrl_node(kn)) {
mutex_unlock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
+ put_online_mems();
cpus_read_unlock();
kernfs_unbreak_active_protection(kn);
return false;
@@ -3318,6 +3323,7 @@ bool info_kn_lock(struct kernfs_node *kn)
void info_kn_unlock(struct kernfs_node *kn)
{
mutex_unlock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
+ put_online_mems();
cpus_read_unlock();
kernfs_unbreak_active_protection(kn);
}
@@ -3671,6 +3677,7 @@ static void resctrl_unmount(void)
struct rdt_resource *r;
cpus_read_lock();
+ get_online_mems();
mutex_lock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
rdt_disable_ctx();
@@ -3686,6 +3693,7 @@ static void resctrl_unmount(void)
resctrl_arch_disable_mon();
resctrl_mounted = false;
mutex_unlock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
+ put_online_mems();
cpus_read_unlock();
}
@@ -3701,6 +3709,7 @@ static int rdt_get_tree(struct fs_context *fc)
DO_ONCE_SLEEPABLE(resctrl_arch_pre_mount);
cpus_read_lock();
+ get_online_mems();
mutex_lock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
/*
* resctrl file system can only be mounted once.
@@ -3804,6 +3813,7 @@ static int rdt_get_tree(struct fs_context *fc)
rdt_last_cmd_clear();
mutex_unlock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
+ put_online_mems();
cpus_read_unlock();
ret = kernfs_get_tree(fc);
@@ -3836,6 +3846,7 @@ static int rdt_get_tree(struct fs_context *fc)
rdtgroup_destroy_root();
out:
mutex_unlock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
+ put_online_mems();
cpus_read_unlock();
return ret;
}
@@ -5502,12 +5513,14 @@ static bool resctrl_online_domains_exist(void)
void resctrl_exit(void)
{
cpus_read_lock();
+ get_online_mems();
WARN_ON_ONCE(resctrl_online_domains_exist());
mutex_lock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
resctrl_fs_teardown();
mutex_unlock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
+ put_online_mems();
cpus_read_unlock();
debugfs_remove_recursive(debugfs_resctrl);
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 17:22 [PATCH RFC v2 00/19] arm,fs/resctrl: ARM MPAM MB_NODE support Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 01/19] resctrl: De-hardcode L3 monitor infrastructure Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 02/19] resctrl: Expose MBA MBM counter assignment sysfs Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 03/19] resctrl: name node-scoped monitor domains mon_NODE_<id> Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 04/19] resctrl: Add node-scope MBM total event Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 05/19] resctrl: Make MBM paths resource-aware Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 06/19] arm_mpam: Support memory-level MSCs and ABMC per class Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 07/19] arm_mpam: Refine L3 topology and class selection Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 08/19] arm_mpam: Include all MSC components during domain setup Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` Fenghua Yu [this message]
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 10/19] arm_mpam: Handle CPU-less numa nodes Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 11/19] arm_mpam: Emulate MB control with node-scoped MB_NODE control Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 12/19] arm_mpam: resctrl: Add NUMA node notifier for domain online/offline Fenghua Yu
2026-09-07 11:12 ` Ben Horgan
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 13/19] resctrl: Add mbm_assign_scope_mode for native assignment file names Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 14/19] Documentation: resctrl: document mbm_assign_scope_mode Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 15/19] Documentation: arm64: mpam: document memory-level MB control and NUMA nodes Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 16/19] Documentation: resctrl: document NODE-scoped MBA domains and mon_NODE monitoring Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 17/19] Documentation: resctrl: document MB_NODE emulation example on ARM MPAM Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 18/19] arm_mpam: Add KUnit test for CPU-less NUMA node affinity Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 19/19] selftests/resctrl: Add MB emulation test for ARM MPAM Fenghua Yu
2026-09-01 9:37 ` [PATCH RFC v2 00/19] arm,fs/resctrl: ARM MPAM MB_NODE support Richard Cheng
2026-09-07 11:20 ` Ben Horgan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260831172245.42253-10-fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--to=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=fustini@kernel.org \
--cc=icheng@nvidia.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=newtonl@nvidia.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.