From: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
Drew Fustini <fustini@kernel.org>,
Vikram Sethi <vsethi@nvidia.com>,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
Newton Liu <newtonl@nvidia.com>,
Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v2 15/19] Documentation: arm64: mpam: document memory-level MB control and NUMA nodes
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 10:22:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831172245.42253-16-fenghuay@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831172245.42253-1-fenghuay@nvidia.com>
The MB control can be backed by a memory-level MSC above L3 rather than
the L3 cache MSC. In that case resctrl identifies domains by NUMA node id
instead of L3 cache id, exposes a node-scoped MB_NODE control, and can
manage CPU-less memory nodes by falling back to cpu_possible_mask.
Update the arm64 MPAM documentation to describe the L3-cache and memory
MSC paths for both the MB control and MBWU monitoring, how to tell them
apart via the control "scope" file, how NUMA node ids map to
/sys/devices/system/node/node*/, and CPU-less NUMA node handling.
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
---
Documentation/arch/arm64/mpam.rst | 105 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/arch/arm64/mpam.rst b/Documentation/arch/arm64/mpam.rst
index 67fe515ed501..88ddee8705e4 100644
--- a/Documentation/arch/arm64/mpam.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arch/arm64/mpam.rst
@@ -44,48 +44,79 @@ The supported features are:
placement.
* Memory bandwidth maximum controls (MBW_MAX) on or after the L3 cache.
- resctrl uses the L3 cache-id to identify where the memory bandwidth
- control is applied. For this reason the platform must have an L3 cache
- with cache-id's supplied by firmware. (It doesn't need to support MPAM.)
-
- To be exported as the 'MB' schema, the topology of the group of MSC chosen
- must match the topology of the L3 cache so that the cache-id's can be
- repainted. For example: Platforms with Memory bandwidth maximum controls
- on CPU-less NUMA nodes cannot expose the 'MB' schema to resctrl as these
- nodes do not have a corresponding L3 cache. If the memory bandwidth
- control is on the memory rather than the L3 then there must be a single
- global L3 as otherwise it is unknown which L3 the traffic came from. There
- must be no caches between the L3 and the memory so that the two ends of
- the path have equivalent traffic.
-
- When the MPAM driver finds multiple groups of MSC it can use for the 'MB'
- schema, it prefers the group closest to the L3 cache.
+ resctrl exposes these as the ``MB`` resource. The domain identifiers
+ used in the ``MB:`` schemata line depend on which MSC group backs the
+ resource:
+
+ **L3-cache MSC (cache-level MB control).**
+ When the MB control hardware sits on the L3 cache MSC, resctrl uses L3
+ cache-ids to identify where bandwidth is applied. The topology of the
+ MSC group must match the L3 cache topology so that cache-ids can be
+ repainted. If the memory bandwidth control is on the memory rather
+ than the L3 then there must be a single global L3 as otherwise it is
+ unknown which L3 the traffic came from. There must be no caches
+ between the L3 and the memory so that the two ends of the path have
+ equivalent traffic.
+
+ **Memory MSC (memory-level MB control).**
+ When the MB control hardware sits on a memory MSC above L3, resctrl uses
+ NUMA node identifiers instead of L3 cache-ids. The native node-scoped
+ control is exposed as ``MB_NODE``; the legacy ``MB`` control keeps the
+ ``MB:`` schemata line for backward compatibility and, in the default
+ legacy mode, is emulated by ``MB_NODE`` when it has no hardware of its
+ own. See the MB control emulation section in
+ Documentation/filesystems/resctrl.rst for the control layout and
+ emulation modes.
+
+ On either path, read the control ``scope`` file under
+ ``info/MB/resource_schemata/`` (``L3`` or ``NODE``) to learn which
+ identifier space the ``MB:`` line uses.
+
+ When ``scope`` reads ``NODE``, each numeric ID ``XX`` in the ``MB:``
+ line is a NUMA node id and corresponds to the standard NUMA node
+ directory ``/sys/devices/system/node/nodeXX/``. That directory
+ describes the node: ``cpulist``/``cpumap`` (the CPUs local to it, empty
+ for a CPU-less node), ``distance`` (NUMA distances to other nodes),
+ ``meminfo`` (its memory), and its ``memoryX`` symlinks. Use these
+ files to map an ``MB:`` (or ``MB_NODE:``) entry to a physical NUMA node
+ and its CPUs and memory.
+
+ **CPU-less NUMA nodes.**
+ A memory MSC may be associated with a NUMA node that has no local CPUs
+ (for example a memory-only node that still participates in bandwidth
+ control). The driver falls back to ``cpu_possible_mask`` for the MSC
+ affinity so that traffic from remote CPUs is still accounted for and
+ the node can appear as an ``MB``/``MB_NODE`` domain.
+
+ When the MPAM driver finds multiple groups of MSC it can use for the
+ ``MB`` resource, it prefers the group closest to the L3 cache.
* Cache Storage Usage (CSU) counters can expose the 'llc_occupancy' provided
there is at least one CSU monitor on each MSC that makes up the L3 group.
Exposing CSU counters from other caches or devices is not supported.
-* Memory Bandwidth Usage (MBWU) on or after the L3 cache. resctrl uses the
- L3 cache-id to identify where the memory bandwidth is measured. For this
- reason the platform must have an L3 cache with cache-id's supplied by
- firmware. (The platform doesn't need to support MPAM.)
-
- Memory bandwidth monitoring makes use of MBWU monitors in each MSC that
- makes up the L3 group. If the memory bandwidth monitoring is on the memory
- rather than the L3 then there must be a single global L3 as otherwise it
- is unknown which L3 the traffic came from.
-
- To expose 'mbm_total_bytes', the topology of the group of MSC chosen must
- match the topology of the L3 cache so that the cache-id's can be
- repainted. For example: Platforms with Memory bandwidth monitors on
- CPU-less NUMA nodes cannot expose 'mbm_total_bytes' as these nodes do not
- have a corresponding L3 cache. 'mbm_local_bytes' is not exposed as MPAM
- cannot distinguish local traffic from global traffic.
-
- All these restrictions based on L3 cache are due to resctrl, currently, only
- supporting monitoring at the L3 scope. It is expected that going forward more
- MBWU monitors can be exposed to the user after support for more monitoring
- scopes is added to resctrl.
+* Memory Bandwidth Usage (MBWU) on or after the L3 cache. resctrl can
+ expose ``mbm_total_bytes`` from either an L3-cache MSC or a memory MSC:
+
+ **L3-cache MSC.**
+ When MBWU monitors sit on the L3 cache MSC, counters are exposed on the
+ ``L3_MON`` resource and use L3 cache-ids. The MSC group topology must
+ match the L3 cache topology so that cache-ids can be repainted.
+
+ **Memory MSC.**
+ When MBWU monitors sit on a memory MSC above L3, counters are exposed on
+ the ``MB`` resource with node scope. Monitor directories are named
+ ``mon_NODE_XX`` where ``XX`` is the same NUMA node identifier that appears
+ in the ``MB:`` schemata line. CPU-less memory nodes are supported the
+ same way as for MB controls above.
+
+ ``mbm_local_bytes`` is not exposed as MPAM cannot distinguish local
+ traffic from global traffic on these paths.
+
+ When only L3-scoped monitoring was supported, platforms with memory
+ bandwidth monitors on CPU-less NUMA nodes could not expose
+ ``mbm_total_bytes``. Node-scoped monitoring on the ``MB`` resource
+ removes that restriction for memory-class MSCs.
Reporting Bugs
==============
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 17:22 [PATCH RFC v2 00/19] arm,fs/resctrl: ARM MPAM MB_NODE support Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 01/19] resctrl: De-hardcode L3 monitor infrastructure Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 02/19] resctrl: Expose MBA MBM counter assignment sysfs Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 03/19] resctrl: name node-scoped monitor domains mon_NODE_<id> Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 04/19] resctrl: Add node-scope MBM total event Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 05/19] resctrl: Make MBM paths resource-aware Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 06/19] arm_mpam: Support memory-level MSCs and ABMC per class Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 07/19] arm_mpam: Refine L3 topology and class selection Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 08/19] arm_mpam: Include all MSC components during domain setup Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 09/19] fs/resctrl: Take memory hotplug lock whenever taking CPU hotplug lock Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 10/19] arm_mpam: Handle CPU-less numa nodes Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 11/19] arm_mpam: Emulate MB control with node-scoped MB_NODE control Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 12/19] arm_mpam: resctrl: Add NUMA node notifier for domain online/offline Fenghua Yu
2026-09-07 11:12 ` Ben Horgan
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 13/19] resctrl: Add mbm_assign_scope_mode for native assignment file names Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 14/19] Documentation: resctrl: document mbm_assign_scope_mode Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` Fenghua Yu [this message]
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 16/19] Documentation: resctrl: document NODE-scoped MBA domains and mon_NODE monitoring Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 17/19] Documentation: resctrl: document MB_NODE emulation example on ARM MPAM Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 18/19] arm_mpam: Add KUnit test for CPU-less NUMA node affinity Fenghua Yu
2026-08-31 17:22 ` [PATCH RFC v2 19/19] selftests/resctrl: Add MB emulation test for ARM MPAM Fenghua Yu
2026-09-01 9:37 ` [PATCH RFC v2 00/19] arm,fs/resctrl: ARM MPAM MB_NODE support Richard Cheng
2026-09-07 11:20 ` Ben Horgan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260831172245.42253-16-fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--to=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=fustini@kernel.org \
--cc=icheng@nvidia.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=newtonl@nvidia.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.