All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Bryan O'Donoghue" <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	robh@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, media-ci@linuxtv.org,
	neil.armstrong@linaro.org, olteanv@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 4/5] media: qcom: camss: Add support for PHY API devices
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2026 12:07:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260906120708.8BCE81F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260906-b4-linux-next-25-03-13-dtsi-x1e80100-camss-v16-4-f7bd68b5369f@linaro.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [High] The Kconfig selects a non-existent symbol `PHY_QCOM_MIPI_CSI2`.
- [High] Missing `phy_exit()` cleanup for successfully initialized PHYs on probe and registration error paths.
- [Medium] Ignored return values from PHY API configuration functions.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Potential NULL pointer dereference of `csiphy->cfg.csi2` if streaming is started before the sensor subdevice is bound.
--

commit 55545599c66ba86b7d549259aecbc5a1c20f76a5
Author: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>

media: qcom: camss: Add support for PHY API devices

This commit adds the ability to use a PHY pointer which interacts with the
standard PHY API. If no PHYs are present in the DT, it falls back to the
legacy configuration method.

> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/Kconfig b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/Kconfig
> index 4eda48cb1adf0..1edc5e5a1829e 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/Kconfig
> @@ -7,3 +7,4 @@ config VIDEO_QCOM_CAMSS
>  	select VIDEO_V4L2_SUBDEV_API
>  	select VIDEOBUF2_DMA_SG
>  	select V4L2_FWNODE
> +	select PHY_QCOM_MIPI_CSI2

[Severity: High]
Does the symbol PHY_QCOM_MIPI_CSI2 exist in the kernel tree?

Selecting a non-existent Kconfig symbol can cause unmet direct dependency
warnings and potentially silent build failures, leaving required features
disabled.

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csiphy.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csiphy.c
> index 539ac4888b608..e00748dd83b02 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csiphy.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csiphy.c
[ ... ]
> +static int csiphy_stream_on(struct csiphy_device *csiphy)
> +{
> +	u8 bpp = csiphy_get_bpp(csiphy->res->formats->formats, csiphy->res->formats->nformats,
> +				csiphy->fmt[MSM_CSIPHY_PAD_SINK].code);
> +	struct csiphy_lanes_cfg *lncfg = &csiphy->cfg.csi2->lane_cfg;
> +	struct phy_configure_opts_mipi_dphy *dphy_cfg;
> +	union phy_configure_opts dphy_opts = { 0 };
> +	struct device *dev = csiphy->camss->dev;
> +	u8 num_lanes = lncfg->num_data;

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but could this code dereference
csiphy->cfg.csi2 while it is NULL?

If userspace opens a video node and issues VIDIOC_STREAMON before the sensor
subdevice binds (or if the sensor never binds), csiphy->cfg.csi2 will remain
uninitialized. The code here dereferences it to read lncfg->num_data before
validating if a sensor is actually present.

> +	s64 link_freq;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	dphy_cfg = &dphy_opts.mipi_dphy;
> +
> +	link_freq = camss_get_link_freq(&csiphy->subdev.entity, bpp, num_lanes);
> +
> +	if (link_freq < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev,
> +			"Cannot get CSI2 transmitter's link frequency\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	phy_mipi_dphy_get_default_config_for_hsclk(link_freq, num_lanes, dphy_cfg);
> +
> +	phy_set_mode(csiphy->phy, PHY_MODE_MIPI_DPHY);
> +
> +	ret = phy_configure(csiphy->phy, &dphy_opts);

[Severity: Medium]
Should the return values of phy_mipi_dphy_get_default_config_for_hsclk() and
phy_set_mode() be checked?

If phy_mipi_dphy_get_default_config_for_hsclk() fails (for example, with a
bad link_freq), dphy_opts will remain untouched. Passing this zero-initialized
structure to phy_configure() could then misconfigure the hardware.

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
> index 2123f6388e3d7..84097d82d99c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -4832,14 +4890,21 @@ static int camss_init_subdevices(struct camss *camss)
>  	unsigned int i;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	camss_detect_legacy_phy(camss);
> +
>  	for (i = 0; i < camss->res->csiphy_num; i++) {
> -		ret = msm_csiphy_subdev_init(camss, &camss->csiphy[i],
> -					     &res->csiphy_res[i],
> -					     res->csiphy_res[i].csiphy.id);
> +		if (!camss->legacy_phy) {
> +			ret = msm_csiphy_subdev_init(camss, i);
> +		} else {
> +			ret = msm_csiphy_subdev_init_legacy(camss,
> +							    &camss->csiphy[i],
> +							    &res->csiphy_res[i],
> +							    res->csiphy_res[i].csiphy.id);
> +		}
> +
>  		if (ret < 0) {
> -			dev_err(camss->dev,
> -				"Failed to init csiphy%d sub-device: %d\n",
> -				i, ret);
> +			dev_err(camss->dev, "csiphy %d init fail\n",
> +				res->csiphy_res[i].csiphy.id);
>  			return ret;
>  		}
>  	}

[Severity: High]
Does this error path leak the PHY initialization state?

When msm_csiphy_subdev_init() succeeds, it calls phy_init(). If a later
csiphy iteration fails, or if a subsequent subdevice like vfe fails to
initialize, camss_init_subdevices() returns early. This jumps to the
err_genpd_cleanup path in camss_probe(), completely bypassing
camss_unregister_entities(), and leaving earlier successfully initialized
PHYs without a balancing phy_exit().

[ ... ]

> @@ -5131,8 +5207,10 @@ static int camss_register_entities(struct camss *camss)
>  
>  	i = camss->res->csiphy_num;
>  err_reg_csiphy:
> -	for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
> -		msm_csiphy_unregister_entity(&camss->csiphy[i]);
> +	for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
> +		if (csiphy_enabled(camss, &camss->csiphy[i]))
> +			msm_csiphy_unregister_entity(&camss->csiphy[i]);
> +	}
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }

[Severity: High]
Does this error path also miss calling phy_exit() for some initialized PHYs?

Because this registration cleanup loop only iterates backward from the failing
index `i`, any csiphys from `i` onward (which were initialized during the
earlier camss_init_subdevices() phase but had not reached registration yet)
will not have their msm_csiphy_unregister_entity() cleanup called. This leaves
their PHY references leaked.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260906-b4-linux-next-25-03-13-dtsi-x1e80100-camss-v16-0-f7bd68b5369f@linaro.org?part=4

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Bryan O'Donoghue" <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	robh@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, media-ci@linuxtv.org,
	neil.armstrong@linaro.org, olteanv@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 4/5] media: qcom: camss: Add support for PHY API devices
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2026 12:07:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260906120708.8BCE81F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260906-b4-linux-next-25-03-13-dtsi-x1e80100-camss-v16-4-f7bd68b5369f@linaro.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [High] The Kconfig selects a non-existent symbol `PHY_QCOM_MIPI_CSI2`.
- [High] Missing `phy_exit()` cleanup for successfully initialized PHYs on probe and registration error paths.
- [Medium] Ignored return values from PHY API configuration functions.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Potential NULL pointer dereference of `csiphy->cfg.csi2` if streaming is started before the sensor subdevice is bound.
--

commit 55545599c66ba86b7d549259aecbc5a1c20f76a5
Author: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>

media: qcom: camss: Add support for PHY API devices

This commit adds the ability to use a PHY pointer which interacts with the
standard PHY API. If no PHYs are present in the DT, it falls back to the
legacy configuration method.

> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/Kconfig b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/Kconfig
> index 4eda48cb1adf0..1edc5e5a1829e 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/Kconfig
> @@ -7,3 +7,4 @@ config VIDEO_QCOM_CAMSS
>  	select VIDEO_V4L2_SUBDEV_API
>  	select VIDEOBUF2_DMA_SG
>  	select V4L2_FWNODE
> +	select PHY_QCOM_MIPI_CSI2

[Severity: High]
Does the symbol PHY_QCOM_MIPI_CSI2 exist in the kernel tree?

Selecting a non-existent Kconfig symbol can cause unmet direct dependency
warnings and potentially silent build failures, leaving required features
disabled.

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csiphy.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csiphy.c
> index 539ac4888b608..e00748dd83b02 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csiphy.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csiphy.c
[ ... ]
> +static int csiphy_stream_on(struct csiphy_device *csiphy)
> +{
> +	u8 bpp = csiphy_get_bpp(csiphy->res->formats->formats, csiphy->res->formats->nformats,
> +				csiphy->fmt[MSM_CSIPHY_PAD_SINK].code);
> +	struct csiphy_lanes_cfg *lncfg = &csiphy->cfg.csi2->lane_cfg;
> +	struct phy_configure_opts_mipi_dphy *dphy_cfg;
> +	union phy_configure_opts dphy_opts = { 0 };
> +	struct device *dev = csiphy->camss->dev;
> +	u8 num_lanes = lncfg->num_data;

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but could this code dereference
csiphy->cfg.csi2 while it is NULL?

If userspace opens a video node and issues VIDIOC_STREAMON before the sensor
subdevice binds (or if the sensor never binds), csiphy->cfg.csi2 will remain
uninitialized. The code here dereferences it to read lncfg->num_data before
validating if a sensor is actually present.

> +	s64 link_freq;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	dphy_cfg = &dphy_opts.mipi_dphy;
> +
> +	link_freq = camss_get_link_freq(&csiphy->subdev.entity, bpp, num_lanes);
> +
> +	if (link_freq < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev,
> +			"Cannot get CSI2 transmitter's link frequency\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	phy_mipi_dphy_get_default_config_for_hsclk(link_freq, num_lanes, dphy_cfg);
> +
> +	phy_set_mode(csiphy->phy, PHY_MODE_MIPI_DPHY);
> +
> +	ret = phy_configure(csiphy->phy, &dphy_opts);

[Severity: Medium]
Should the return values of phy_mipi_dphy_get_default_config_for_hsclk() and
phy_set_mode() be checked?

If phy_mipi_dphy_get_default_config_for_hsclk() fails (for example, with a
bad link_freq), dphy_opts will remain untouched. Passing this zero-initialized
structure to phy_configure() could then misconfigure the hardware.

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
> index 2123f6388e3d7..84097d82d99c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -4832,14 +4890,21 @@ static int camss_init_subdevices(struct camss *camss)
>  	unsigned int i;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	camss_detect_legacy_phy(camss);
> +
>  	for (i = 0; i < camss->res->csiphy_num; i++) {
> -		ret = msm_csiphy_subdev_init(camss, &camss->csiphy[i],
> -					     &res->csiphy_res[i],
> -					     res->csiphy_res[i].csiphy.id);
> +		if (!camss->legacy_phy) {
> +			ret = msm_csiphy_subdev_init(camss, i);
> +		} else {
> +			ret = msm_csiphy_subdev_init_legacy(camss,
> +							    &camss->csiphy[i],
> +							    &res->csiphy_res[i],
> +							    res->csiphy_res[i].csiphy.id);
> +		}
> +
>  		if (ret < 0) {
> -			dev_err(camss->dev,
> -				"Failed to init csiphy%d sub-device: %d\n",
> -				i, ret);
> +			dev_err(camss->dev, "csiphy %d init fail\n",
> +				res->csiphy_res[i].csiphy.id);
>  			return ret;
>  		}
>  	}

[Severity: High]
Does this error path leak the PHY initialization state?

When msm_csiphy_subdev_init() succeeds, it calls phy_init(). If a later
csiphy iteration fails, or if a subsequent subdevice like vfe fails to
initialize, camss_init_subdevices() returns early. This jumps to the
err_genpd_cleanup path in camss_probe(), completely bypassing
camss_unregister_entities(), and leaving earlier successfully initialized
PHYs without a balancing phy_exit().

[ ... ]

> @@ -5131,8 +5207,10 @@ static int camss_register_entities(struct camss *camss)
>  
>  	i = camss->res->csiphy_num;
>  err_reg_csiphy:
> -	for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
> -		msm_csiphy_unregister_entity(&camss->csiphy[i]);
> +	for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
> +		if (csiphy_enabled(camss, &camss->csiphy[i]))
> +			msm_csiphy_unregister_entity(&camss->csiphy[i]);
> +	}
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }

[Severity: High]
Does this error path also miss calling phy_exit() for some initialized PHYs?

Because this registration cleanup loop only iterates backward from the failing
index `i`, any csiphys from `i` onward (which were initialized during the
earlier camss_init_subdevices() phase but had not reached registration yet)
will not have their msm_csiphy_unregister_entity() cleanup called. This leaves
their PHY references leaked.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260906-b4-linux-next-25-03-13-dtsi-x1e80100-camss-v16-0-f7bd68b5369f@linaro.org?part=4

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-06 12:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-06 11:52 [PATCH v16 0/5] Add phy_get_by_of_node and devm helper Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-09-06 11:52 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-09-06 11:52 ` [PATCH v16 1/5] phy: core: Fix use-after-free in phy_get paths Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-09-06 11:52   ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-09-11 20:56   ` Frank Li
2026-09-11 20:56     ` Frank Li
2026-09-06 11:52 ` [PATCH v16 2/5] phy: core: Add phy_get_by_of_node() Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-09-06 11:52   ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-09-06 11:52 ` [PATCH v16 3/5] phy: core: Add devm_phy_get_by_of_node() Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-09-06 11:52   ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-09-11 21:09   ` Frank Li
2026-09-11 21:09     ` Frank Li
2026-09-06 11:52 ` [PATCH v16 4/5] media: qcom: camss: Add support for PHY API devices Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-09-06 11:52   ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-09-06 12:07   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-06 12:07     ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-06 11:52 ` [PATCH v16 5/5] media: qcom: camss: Use data-lanes starting at 1 for new CSIPHY mode Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-09-06 11:52   ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2026-09-06 12:00   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-06 12:00     ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-06 13:03   ` Nihal Kumar Gupta
2026-09-06 13:03     ` Nihal Kumar Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260906120708.8BCE81F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=media-ci@linuxtv.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.