From: Chen Pei <cp0613@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
memxor@gmail.com, bjorn@kernel.org, puranjay@kernel.org
Cc: ihor.solodrai@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, martin.lau@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, jolsa@kernel.org,
emil@etsalapatis.com, pjw@kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com,
shuah@kernel.org, guoren@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, riscv: Register extable entries at probe insn call sites
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 11:26:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260907023000.16104-1-reply-cp0613@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7fbae9ac-44e4-4607-8aba-15db9779f80d@huawei.com>
> This patch looks fine, but I still tend not to introduce these changes.
> I think the function itself should handle its own defensive checks, and
> we should also avoid "shotgun surgery".
Indeed, you have a point. Thanks for the review.
Best regards,
Pei
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chen Pei <cp0613@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
memxor@gmail.com, bjorn@kernel.org, puranjay@kernel.org
Cc: ihor.solodrai@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, martin.lau@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, jolsa@kernel.org,
emil@etsalapatis.com, pjw@kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com,
shuah@kernel.org, guoren@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, riscv: Register extable entries at probe insn call sites
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 11:26:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260907023000.16104-1-reply-cp0613@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7fbae9ac-44e4-4607-8aba-15db9779f80d@huawei.com>
> This patch looks fine, but I still tend not to introduce these changes.
> I think the function itself should handle its own defensive checks, and
> we should also avoid "shotgun surgery".
Indeed, you have a point. Thanks for the review.
Best regards,
Pei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 3:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 12:00 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, riscv: Register extable entries at probe insn call sites Chen Pei
2026-09-01 12:00 ` Chen Pei
2026-09-01 12:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 13:31 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-01 13:31 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-02 2:26 ` Chen Pei
2026-09-02 2:26 ` Chen Pei
2026-09-05 3:44 ` Pu Lehui
2026-09-05 3:44 ` Pu Lehui
2026-09-07 3:26 ` Chen Pei [this message]
2026-09-07 3:26 ` Chen Pei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260907023000.16104-1-reply-cp0613@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=cp0613@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=pulehui@huawei.com \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.