All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linuszeng via B4 Relay <devnull+linuszeng.tencent.com@kernel.org>
To: "Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	"Roman Gushchin" <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	"Shakeel Butt" <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	"Muchun Song" <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
	"Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
	"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
	"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <dev@lankhorst.se>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Natalie Vock" <nat@pixelcluster.dev>,
	"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>, "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"Oscar Salvador" <osalvador@suse.de>,
	"Jingxiang Zeng" <jingxiangzeng.cas@gmail.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org,  linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linuszeng <linuszeng@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] mm: page_counter: add page_counter_protection struct and init API
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 16:08:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909-descriptive-name-v1-1-1828961cb01a@tencent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909-descriptive-name-v1-0-1828961cb01a@tencent.com>

From: linuszeng <linuszeng@tencent.com>

Hierarchical protection (memory.min/memory.low) is only used by the
memory page counter (and dmem pools); swap/memsw, kmem and tcpmem
counters never participate in it, yet each struct page_counter carries
the full protection state.

Introduce struct page_counter_protection to hold that state, link it to
struct page_counter via a ->prot pointer (NULL when protection is not
supported) and switch track_protection() to it. page_counter_init()
drops its protection_support argument and the new
page_counter_init_protection() attaches the protection context. Like
page_counter_init(), it expects the rest of the structure to be zeroed
by the caller's allocation.

Protection tracking is only enabled on the cgroup v2 hierarchy, matching
the previous page_counter_init(..., memcg_on_dfl) behavior.

No functional change.
---
 include/linux/memcontrol.h   |  7 ++++++
 include/linux/page_counter.h | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 kernel/cgroup/dmem.c         |  6 +++--
 mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c          |  4 +--
 mm/memcontrol.c              | 21 ++++++++++------
 mm/page_counter.c            |  2 +-
 6 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 058ebd73ff16..ed863f4ed233 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -195,6 +195,13 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
 	/* Accounted resources */
 	struct page_counter memory;		/* Both v1 & v2 */
 
+	/*
+	 * Hierarchical memory.min/memory.low protection tracking for the
+	 * memory page counter. swap/memsw, kmem and tcpmem counters do not
+	 * support protection and have no such context.
+	 */
+	struct page_counter_protection memory_prot;
+
 	union {
 		struct page_counter swap;	/* v2 only */
 		struct page_counter memsw;	/* v1 only */
diff --git a/include/linux/page_counter.h b/include/linux/page_counter.h
index 07b7cb12249c..b81f16702764 100644
--- a/include/linux/page_counter.h
+++ b/include/linux/page_counter.h
@@ -7,6 +7,32 @@
 #include <linux/limits.h>
 #include <asm/page.h>
 
+/*
+ * Hierarchical protection (memory.min / memory.low) tracking.
+ *
+ * Only the memory page counter (and dmem pools) participate in protection.
+ * swap/memsw, kmem and tcpmem page counters never do, so the protection
+ * fields are kept out of struct page_counter in this separate structure to
+ * save space in the common case. struct page_counter links to it via ->prot,
+ * which is NULL for counters without protection support.
+ */
+struct page_counter_protection {
+	struct page_counter_protection *parent;
+
+	/* effective memory.min and memory.min usage tracking */
+	unsigned long emin;
+	atomic_long_t min_usage;
+	atomic_long_t children_min_usage;
+
+	/* effective memory.low and memory.low usage tracking */
+	unsigned long elow;
+	atomic_long_t low_usage;
+	atomic_long_t children_low_usage;
+
+	unsigned long min;
+	unsigned long low;
+};
+
 struct page_counter {
 	/*
 	 * Make sure 'usage' does not share cacheline with any other field in
@@ -41,6 +67,12 @@ struct page_counter {
 	unsigned long high;
 	unsigned long max;
 	struct page_counter *parent;
+
+	/*
+	 * Hierarchical protection context, NULL for counters that do not
+	 * support memory.min/memory.low (swap, memsw, kmem, tcpmem, ...).
+	 */
+	struct page_counter_protection *prot;
 } ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
 
 #if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
@@ -49,18 +81,33 @@ struct page_counter {
 #define PAGE_COUNTER_MAX (LONG_MAX / PAGE_SIZE)
 #endif
 
-/*
- * Protection is supported only for the first counter (with id 0).
- */
 static inline void page_counter_init(struct page_counter *counter,
-				     struct page_counter *parent,
-				     bool protection_support)
+				     struct page_counter *parent)
 {
 	counter->usage = (atomic_long_t)ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(0);
 	counter->max = PAGE_COUNTER_MAX;
 	counter->parent = parent;
-	counter->protection_support = protection_support;
 	counter->track_failcnt = false;
+	counter->prot = NULL;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Enable hierarchical protection (memory.min/memory.low) on @counter.
+ * @prot and @parent are the protection contexts of @counter and its
+ * parent page counter respectively. Only the memory page counter (and
+ * dmem pools) call this.
+ *
+ * The remaining members of @prot (emin, elow and the usage counters) are
+ * expected to be zero already, so @prot must come from zeroed memory.
+ */
+static inline void page_counter_init_protection(struct page_counter *counter,
+						struct page_counter_protection *prot,
+						struct page_counter_protection *parent)
+{
+	counter->prot = prot;
+	prot->parent = parent;
+	prot->min = 0;
+	prot->low = 0;
 }
 
 static inline unsigned long page_counter_read(struct page_counter *counter)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/dmem.c b/kernel/cgroup/dmem.c
index 4683f3d68022..e33d807cdea8 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/dmem.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/dmem.c
@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ struct dmem_cgroup_pool_state {
 	struct rcu_head rcu;
 
 	struct page_counter cnt;
+	struct page_counter_protection prot;
 	struct dmem_cgroup_pool_state *parent;
 
 	refcount_t ref;
@@ -426,8 +427,9 @@ alloc_pool_single(struct dmemcg_state *dmemcs, struct dmem_cgroup_region *region
 	if (parent)
 		ppool = find_cg_pool_locked(parent, region);
 
-	page_counter_init(&pool->cnt,
-			  ppool ? &ppool->cnt : NULL, true);
+	page_counter_init(&pool->cnt, ppool ? &ppool->cnt : NULL);
+	page_counter_init_protection(&pool->cnt, &pool->prot,
+				     ppool ? &ppool->prot : NULL);
 	reset_all_resource_limits(pool);
 	refcount_set(&pool->ref, 1);
 	kref_get(&region->ref);
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c b/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c
index ecb6e0b7819a..7fdae504cfc6 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c
@@ -108,8 +108,8 @@ static void hugetlb_cgroup_init(struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cgroup,
 		fault = hugetlb_cgroup_counter_from_cgroup(h_cgroup, idx);
 		rsvd = hugetlb_cgroup_counter_from_cgroup_rsvd(h_cgroup, idx);
 
-		page_counter_init(fault, fault_parent, false);
-		page_counter_init(rsvd, rsvd_parent, false);
+		page_counter_init(fault, fault_parent);
+		page_counter_init(rsvd, rsvd_parent);
 
 		if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(hugetlb_cgrp_subsys)) {
 			fault->track_failcnt = true;
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 86ff580c7018..ffa1ced3baae 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -4267,25 +4267,30 @@ mem_cgroup_css_alloc(struct cgroup_subsys_state *parent_css)
 #endif
 	page_counter_set_high(&memcg->swap, PAGE_COUNTER_MAX);
 	if (parent) {
-		page_counter_init(&memcg->memory, &parent->memory, memcg_on_dfl);
-		page_counter_init(&memcg->swap, &parent->swap, false);
+		page_counter_init(&memcg->memory, &parent->memory);
+		if (memcg_on_dfl)
+			page_counter_init_protection(&memcg->memory, &memcg->memory_prot,
+						     &parent->memory_prot);
+		page_counter_init(&memcg->swap, &parent->swap);
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_V1
 		WRITE_ONCE(memcg->swappiness, mem_cgroup_swappiness(parent));
 		memcg->memory.track_failcnt = !memcg_on_dfl;
 		memcg->memsw.track_failcnt = !memcg_on_dfl;
 		WRITE_ONCE(memcg->oom_kill_disable, READ_ONCE(parent->oom_kill_disable));
-		page_counter_init(&memcg->kmem, &parent->kmem, false);
-		page_counter_init(&memcg->tcpmem, &parent->tcpmem, false);
+		page_counter_init(&memcg->kmem, &parent->kmem);
+		page_counter_init(&memcg->tcpmem, &parent->tcpmem);
 		memcg->tcpmem.track_failcnt = !memcg_on_dfl;
 #endif
 	} else {
 		init_memcg_stats();
 		init_memcg_events();
-		page_counter_init(&memcg->memory, NULL, true);
-		page_counter_init(&memcg->swap, NULL, false);
+		page_counter_init(&memcg->memory, NULL);
+		page_counter_init_protection(&memcg->memory, &memcg->memory_prot,
+					     NULL);
+		page_counter_init(&memcg->swap, NULL);
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_V1
-		page_counter_init(&memcg->kmem, NULL, false);
-		page_counter_init(&memcg->tcpmem, NULL, false);
+		page_counter_init(&memcg->kmem, NULL);
+		page_counter_init(&memcg->tcpmem, NULL);
 #endif
 		root_mem_cgroup = memcg;
 		return &memcg->css;
diff --git a/mm/page_counter.c b/mm/page_counter.c
index 450543f4b318..38cb99f5f50e 100644
--- a/mm/page_counter.c
+++ b/mm/page_counter.c
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
 
 static bool track_protection(struct page_counter *c)
 {
-	return c->protection_support;
+	return c->prot != NULL;
 }
 
 static void propagate_protected_usage(struct page_counter *c,

-- 
2.43.7



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linuszeng <linuszeng@tencent.com>
To: "Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	"Roman Gushchin" <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	"Shakeel Butt" <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	"Muchun Song" <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
	"Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
	"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
	"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <dev@lankhorst.se>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Natalie Vock" <nat@pixelcluster.dev>,
	"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>, "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"Oscar Salvador" <osalvador@suse.de>,
	"Jingxiang Zeng" <jingxiangzeng.cas@gmail.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org,  linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linuszeng <linuszeng@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] mm: page_counter: add page_counter_protection struct and init API
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 16:08:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909-descriptive-name-v1-1-1828961cb01a@tencent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909-descriptive-name-v1-0-1828961cb01a@tencent.com>

Hierarchical protection (memory.min/memory.low) is only used by the
memory page counter (and dmem pools); swap/memsw, kmem and tcpmem
counters never participate in it, yet each struct page_counter carries
the full protection state.

Introduce struct page_counter_protection to hold that state, link it to
struct page_counter via a ->prot pointer (NULL when protection is not
supported) and switch track_protection() to it. page_counter_init()
drops its protection_support argument and the new
page_counter_init_protection() attaches the protection context. Like
page_counter_init(), it expects the rest of the structure to be zeroed
by the caller's allocation.

Protection tracking is only enabled on the cgroup v2 hierarchy, matching
the previous page_counter_init(..., memcg_on_dfl) behavior.

No functional change.
---
 include/linux/memcontrol.h   |  7 ++++++
 include/linux/page_counter.h | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 kernel/cgroup/dmem.c         |  6 +++--
 mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c          |  4 +--
 mm/memcontrol.c              | 21 ++++++++++------
 mm/page_counter.c            |  2 +-
 6 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 058ebd73ff16..ed863f4ed233 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -195,6 +195,13 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
 	/* Accounted resources */
 	struct page_counter memory;		/* Both v1 & v2 */
 
+	/*
+	 * Hierarchical memory.min/memory.low protection tracking for the
+	 * memory page counter. swap/memsw, kmem and tcpmem counters do not
+	 * support protection and have no such context.
+	 */
+	struct page_counter_protection memory_prot;
+
 	union {
 		struct page_counter swap;	/* v2 only */
 		struct page_counter memsw;	/* v1 only */
diff --git a/include/linux/page_counter.h b/include/linux/page_counter.h
index 07b7cb12249c..b81f16702764 100644
--- a/include/linux/page_counter.h
+++ b/include/linux/page_counter.h
@@ -7,6 +7,32 @@
 #include <linux/limits.h>
 #include <asm/page.h>
 
+/*
+ * Hierarchical protection (memory.min / memory.low) tracking.
+ *
+ * Only the memory page counter (and dmem pools) participate in protection.
+ * swap/memsw, kmem and tcpmem page counters never do, so the protection
+ * fields are kept out of struct page_counter in this separate structure to
+ * save space in the common case. struct page_counter links to it via ->prot,
+ * which is NULL for counters without protection support.
+ */
+struct page_counter_protection {
+	struct page_counter_protection *parent;
+
+	/* effective memory.min and memory.min usage tracking */
+	unsigned long emin;
+	atomic_long_t min_usage;
+	atomic_long_t children_min_usage;
+
+	/* effective memory.low and memory.low usage tracking */
+	unsigned long elow;
+	atomic_long_t low_usage;
+	atomic_long_t children_low_usage;
+
+	unsigned long min;
+	unsigned long low;
+};
+
 struct page_counter {
 	/*
 	 * Make sure 'usage' does not share cacheline with any other field in
@@ -41,6 +67,12 @@ struct page_counter {
 	unsigned long high;
 	unsigned long max;
 	struct page_counter *parent;
+
+	/*
+	 * Hierarchical protection context, NULL for counters that do not
+	 * support memory.min/memory.low (swap, memsw, kmem, tcpmem, ...).
+	 */
+	struct page_counter_protection *prot;
 } ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
 
 #if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
@@ -49,18 +81,33 @@ struct page_counter {
 #define PAGE_COUNTER_MAX (LONG_MAX / PAGE_SIZE)
 #endif
 
-/*
- * Protection is supported only for the first counter (with id 0).
- */
 static inline void page_counter_init(struct page_counter *counter,
-				     struct page_counter *parent,
-				     bool protection_support)
+				     struct page_counter *parent)
 {
 	counter->usage = (atomic_long_t)ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(0);
 	counter->max = PAGE_COUNTER_MAX;
 	counter->parent = parent;
-	counter->protection_support = protection_support;
 	counter->track_failcnt = false;
+	counter->prot = NULL;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Enable hierarchical protection (memory.min/memory.low) on @counter.
+ * @prot and @parent are the protection contexts of @counter and its
+ * parent page counter respectively. Only the memory page counter (and
+ * dmem pools) call this.
+ *
+ * The remaining members of @prot (emin, elow and the usage counters) are
+ * expected to be zero already, so @prot must come from zeroed memory.
+ */
+static inline void page_counter_init_protection(struct page_counter *counter,
+						struct page_counter_protection *prot,
+						struct page_counter_protection *parent)
+{
+	counter->prot = prot;
+	prot->parent = parent;
+	prot->min = 0;
+	prot->low = 0;
 }
 
 static inline unsigned long page_counter_read(struct page_counter *counter)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/dmem.c b/kernel/cgroup/dmem.c
index 4683f3d68022..e33d807cdea8 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/dmem.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/dmem.c
@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ struct dmem_cgroup_pool_state {
 	struct rcu_head rcu;
 
 	struct page_counter cnt;
+	struct page_counter_protection prot;
 	struct dmem_cgroup_pool_state *parent;
 
 	refcount_t ref;
@@ -426,8 +427,9 @@ alloc_pool_single(struct dmemcg_state *dmemcs, struct dmem_cgroup_region *region
 	if (parent)
 		ppool = find_cg_pool_locked(parent, region);
 
-	page_counter_init(&pool->cnt,
-			  ppool ? &ppool->cnt : NULL, true);
+	page_counter_init(&pool->cnt, ppool ? &ppool->cnt : NULL);
+	page_counter_init_protection(&pool->cnt, &pool->prot,
+				     ppool ? &ppool->prot : NULL);
 	reset_all_resource_limits(pool);
 	refcount_set(&pool->ref, 1);
 	kref_get(&region->ref);
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c b/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c
index ecb6e0b7819a..7fdae504cfc6 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c
@@ -108,8 +108,8 @@ static void hugetlb_cgroup_init(struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cgroup,
 		fault = hugetlb_cgroup_counter_from_cgroup(h_cgroup, idx);
 		rsvd = hugetlb_cgroup_counter_from_cgroup_rsvd(h_cgroup, idx);
 
-		page_counter_init(fault, fault_parent, false);
-		page_counter_init(rsvd, rsvd_parent, false);
+		page_counter_init(fault, fault_parent);
+		page_counter_init(rsvd, rsvd_parent);
 
 		if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(hugetlb_cgrp_subsys)) {
 			fault->track_failcnt = true;
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 86ff580c7018..ffa1ced3baae 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -4267,25 +4267,30 @@ mem_cgroup_css_alloc(struct cgroup_subsys_state *parent_css)
 #endif
 	page_counter_set_high(&memcg->swap, PAGE_COUNTER_MAX);
 	if (parent) {
-		page_counter_init(&memcg->memory, &parent->memory, memcg_on_dfl);
-		page_counter_init(&memcg->swap, &parent->swap, false);
+		page_counter_init(&memcg->memory, &parent->memory);
+		if (memcg_on_dfl)
+			page_counter_init_protection(&memcg->memory, &memcg->memory_prot,
+						     &parent->memory_prot);
+		page_counter_init(&memcg->swap, &parent->swap);
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_V1
 		WRITE_ONCE(memcg->swappiness, mem_cgroup_swappiness(parent));
 		memcg->memory.track_failcnt = !memcg_on_dfl;
 		memcg->memsw.track_failcnt = !memcg_on_dfl;
 		WRITE_ONCE(memcg->oom_kill_disable, READ_ONCE(parent->oom_kill_disable));
-		page_counter_init(&memcg->kmem, &parent->kmem, false);
-		page_counter_init(&memcg->tcpmem, &parent->tcpmem, false);
+		page_counter_init(&memcg->kmem, &parent->kmem);
+		page_counter_init(&memcg->tcpmem, &parent->tcpmem);
 		memcg->tcpmem.track_failcnt = !memcg_on_dfl;
 #endif
 	} else {
 		init_memcg_stats();
 		init_memcg_events();
-		page_counter_init(&memcg->memory, NULL, true);
-		page_counter_init(&memcg->swap, NULL, false);
+		page_counter_init(&memcg->memory, NULL);
+		page_counter_init_protection(&memcg->memory, &memcg->memory_prot,
+					     NULL);
+		page_counter_init(&memcg->swap, NULL);
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_V1
-		page_counter_init(&memcg->kmem, NULL, false);
-		page_counter_init(&memcg->tcpmem, NULL, false);
+		page_counter_init(&memcg->kmem, NULL);
+		page_counter_init(&memcg->tcpmem, NULL);
 #endif
 		root_mem_cgroup = memcg;
 		return &memcg->css;
diff --git a/mm/page_counter.c b/mm/page_counter.c
index 450543f4b318..38cb99f5f50e 100644
--- a/mm/page_counter.c
+++ b/mm/page_counter.c
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
 
 static bool track_protection(struct page_counter *c)
 {
-	return c->protection_support;
+	return c->prot != NULL;
 }
 
 static void propagate_protected_usage(struct page_counter *c,

-- 
2.43.7


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-09  8:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-09  8:08 [PATCH 0/3] mm: page_counter: move hierarchical protection out of struct page_counter linuszeng via B4 Relay
2026-09-09  8:08 ` linuszeng
2026-09-09  8:08 ` linuszeng via B4 Relay [this message]
2026-09-09  8:08   ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: page_counter: add page_counter_protection struct and init API linuszeng
2026-09-09  8:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09  8:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: page_counter: track protection state in page_counter_protection linuszeng via B4 Relay
2026-09-09  8:08   ` linuszeng
2026-09-09  8:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: page_counter: drop protection fields from struct page_counter linuszeng via B4 Relay
2026-09-09  8:08   ` linuszeng
2026-09-09  8:38   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260909-descriptive-name-v1-1-1828961cb01a@tencent.com \
    --to=devnull+linuszeng.tencent.com@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev@lankhorst.se \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jingxiangzeng.cas@gmail.com \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linuszeng@tencent.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=nat@pixelcluster.dev \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.