From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] iommu/vt-d: Fix issues reported by Sashiko
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 15:50:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909075106.738691-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Hi,
This collects a number of pre-existing issues that were reported by
Sashiko while reviewing recent VT-d patches. None of them are
regressions from the patches under review; they are latent problems in
code those patches happened to touch.
Thanks,
baolu
Lu Baolu (7):
iommu/vt-d: Avoid out-of-range shift in qi_desc_dev_iotlb_pasid()
iommu/vt-d: Do not ignore context table copy failures
iommu/vt-d: Handle DID reservation errors when copying context tables
iommu/vt-d: Reserve scalable-mode DIDs from PASID entries during copy
iommu/vt-d: Use old domain parameter when attaching the blocking
domain
iommu/vt-d: Fix iopf refcount leak in nested attach
iommu/vt-d: Drop old iopf ref only after attach succeeds
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h | 17 +++-
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 152 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
drivers/iommu/intel/nested.c | 2 +
3 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-09 7:50 Lu Baolu [this message]
2026-09-09 7:51 ` [PATCH 1/7] iommu/vt-d: Avoid out-of-range shift in qi_desc_dev_iotlb_pasid() Lu Baolu
2026-09-09 7:51 ` [PATCH 2/7] iommu/vt-d: Do not ignore context table copy failures Lu Baolu
2026-09-09 7:51 ` [PATCH 3/7] iommu/vt-d: Handle DID reservation errors when copying context tables Lu Baolu
2026-09-09 7:51 ` [PATCH 4/7] iommu/vt-d: Reserve scalable-mode DIDs from PASID entries during copy Lu Baolu
2026-09-09 7:51 ` [PATCH 5/7] iommu/vt-d: Use old domain parameter when attaching the blocking domain Lu Baolu
2026-09-09 7:51 ` [PATCH 6/7] iommu/vt-d: Fix iopf refcount leak in nested attach Lu Baolu
2026-09-09 7:51 ` [PATCH 7/7] iommu/vt-d: Drop old iopf ref only after attach succeeds Lu Baolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260909075106.738691-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.