From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] iommu/vt-d: Fix iopf refcount leak in nested attach
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 15:51:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909075106.738691-7-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909075106.738691-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
intel_nested_attach_dev() takes an iopf reference for the new domain but
does not drop the possible reference from the old domain. This leaks
info->iopf_refcount, can keep the device permanently on the iopf queue,
and later triggers WARN_ON(info->iopf_refcount) when PRI is disabled.
Fix this by dropping the possible reference from the old domain after
the nested translation setup completes.
Fixes: 17fce9d2336d9 ("iommu/vt-d: Put iopf enablement in domain attach path")
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/iommu/intel/nested.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/nested.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/nested.c
index 2b979bec56ce..f84fc8b41fde 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/nested.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/nested.c
@@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ static int intel_nested_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,
if (ret)
goto disable_iopf;
+ iopf_for_domain_remove(old, dev);
+
info->domain = dmar_domain;
info->domain_attached = true;
spin_lock_irqsave(&dmar_domain->lock, flags);
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-09 7:50 [PATCH 0/7] iommu/vt-d: Fix issues reported by Sashiko Lu Baolu
2026-09-09 7:51 ` [PATCH 1/7] iommu/vt-d: Avoid out-of-range shift in qi_desc_dev_iotlb_pasid() Lu Baolu
2026-09-09 7:51 ` [PATCH 2/7] iommu/vt-d: Do not ignore context table copy failures Lu Baolu
2026-09-09 7:51 ` [PATCH 3/7] iommu/vt-d: Handle DID reservation errors when copying context tables Lu Baolu
2026-09-09 7:51 ` [PATCH 4/7] iommu/vt-d: Reserve scalable-mode DIDs from PASID entries during copy Lu Baolu
2026-09-09 7:51 ` [PATCH 5/7] iommu/vt-d: Use old domain parameter when attaching the blocking domain Lu Baolu
2026-09-09 7:51 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2026-09-09 7:51 ` [PATCH 7/7] iommu/vt-d: Drop old iopf ref only after attach succeeds Lu Baolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260909075106.738691-7-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.