All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Oleg Keri" <okerixx@gmail.com>
Cc: neil.armstrong@linaro.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
	linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, olteanv@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] phy: qcom: qmp-combo: check qmp_combo_com_init() in the typec callbacks
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 15:25:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909152539.477421F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909151443.10276-3-okerixx@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Unclocked register access causing a kernel panic during PHY teardown after a Type-C switch failure.
--

commit cb054e3d77c744e573bfa78e02cb5e307f60efa6
Author: Oleg Keri <okerixx@gmail.com>

phy: qcom: qmp-combo: check qmp_combo_com_init() in the typec callbacks

This commit updates the Type-C callbacks in the Qualcomm QMP combo PHY
driver to propagate errors from qmp_combo_com_init(). Instead of ignoring
a bringup failure, it bails out early to avoid writing to PHY registers
without a clock running.

> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c
> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -4791,15 +4792,19 @@ static int qmp_combo_typec_switch_set(struct typec_switch_dev *sw,
>  			qmp_combo_usb_power_off(qmp->usb_phy);
>  		qmp_combo_com_exit(qmp, true);
>  
> -		qmp_combo_com_init(qmp, true);
> +		ret = qmp_combo_com_init(qmp, true);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto out;

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this early bailout path leave the
logical state out of sync with the hardware? 

If qmp_combo_com_init() fails, the hardware remains unclocked, but the
generic PHY framework appears unaware of this failure.

> +
>  		if (qmp->usb_init_count)
>  			qmp_combo_usb_power_on(qmp->usb_phy);

[ ... ]

> @@ -4863,7 +4869,9 @@ static int qmp_combo_typec_mux_set(struct typec_mux_dev *mux, struct typec_mux_s
>  		qmp_combo_com_exit(qmp, true);
>  
>  		/* Now everything's powered down, power up the right PHYs */
> -		qmp_combo_com_init(qmp, true);
> +		ret = qmp_combo_com_init(qmp, true);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;

[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but does this early exit similarly leave
the PHY powered down while software counters indicate it is still active?

If a consumer later tears down the PHY by calling phy_exit(), the teardown
path will call qmp_combo_usb_power_off(). Since the clocks were left disabled
during the early return here, qmp_combo_usb_power_off() will perform an
unconditional register access without clocks:

qmp_combo_usb_power_off() {
        ...
        qphy_setbits(qmp->pcs, cfg->regs[QPHY_SW_RESET], SW_RESET);
        ...
}

Could this trigger a Synchronous External Abort (SEA) kernel panic on
Qualcomm platforms, since the early exit strategy leaves the PHY framework
thinking the PHY is still active?

>  
>  		if (new_mode == QMPPHY_MODE_DP_ONLY) {
>  			if (qmp->usb_init_count)

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260909151443.10276-1-okerixx@gmail.com?part=2

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-09 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-09 15:14 [PATCH 0/2] phy: qcom: qmp-combo: fix forced com_init() error handling Oleg Keri
2026-09-09 15:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] phy: qcom: qmp-combo: do not decrement init_count on a forced init failure Oleg Keri
2026-09-09 15:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 15:38     ` Oleg Keri
2026-09-09 15:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] phy: qcom: qmp-combo: check qmp_combo_com_init() in the typec callbacks Oleg Keri
2026-09-09 15:25   ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260909152539.477421F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=okerixx@gmail.com \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.