[PATCH v3] fpga: fix typo in s10_ops_write() comment

[PATCH v3] fpga: fix typo in s10_ops_write() comment

[Hemanth Selam]

The comment reads "reuse it to send more data or free if if all data has
been sent".  The first "if" is not a repetition, it should be "it", to
match the "reuse it" earlier in the same sentence.

Only touches a comment, no code changes.

Assisted-by: Cursor:claude-opus-5
Signed-off-by: Hemanth Selam <hemanth.selam@gmail.com>
---
v3:
 - move the version history out of the commit message and below the ---
   line, so it does not land in git history (Xu Yilun)

v2:
 - "free it if" rather than deleting the second "if", which left the
   sentence without an object (Xu Yilun)

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260904112153.35820-1-hemanth.selam@gmail.com/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260907044344.3130-1-hemanth.selam@gmail.com/

 drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c b/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c
index b8ec2e6f615f..5aed560050c2 100644
--- a/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c
+++ b/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ static int s10_ops_write(struct fpga_manager *mgr, const char *buf,
 
 	/*
 	 * Loop waiting for buffers to be returned.  When a buffer is returned,
-	 * reuse it to send more data or free if if all data has been sent.
+	 * reuse it to send more data or free it if all data has been sent.
 	 */
 	while (count > 0 || s10_free_buffer_count(mgr) != NUM_SVC_BUFS) {
 		reinit_completion(&priv->status_return_completion);
-- 
2.48.1

Re: [PATCH v3] fpga: fix typo in s10_ops_write() comment

[Xu Yilun]

On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 10:15:45AM +0530, Hemanth Selam wrote:
> The comment reads "reuse it to send more data or free if if all data has
> been sent".  The first "if" is not a repetition, it should be "it", to
> match the "reuse it" earlier in the same sentence.
> 
> Only touches a comment, no code changes.
> 
> Assisted-by: Cursor:claude-opus-5
> Signed-off-by: Hemanth Selam <hemanth.selam@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>

Applied to for-next