From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>, live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, jikos@kernel.org, pmladek@suse.com,
joe.lawrence@redhat.com, puranjay@kernel.org, mbenes@suse.cz,
jpoimboe@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/58] objtool: Keep failing test workdirs by default
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 19:07:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260911190705.248B91F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260911184305.1457308-11-song@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Tests that fail due to unexpected termination (e.g., shell errors, signals) or undeclared skips have their working directories incorrectly deleted despite KEEP=failed, while the runner falsely claims they were kept.
- [Medium] When a test is executed standalone (not via run-tests.sh) and fails, KEEP=failed silently leaks the temporary directory without printing its path.
--
commit 14c7ac654e8638035a6ea9f8c26ee25df0293be4
Author: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>
objtool: Keep failing test workdirs by default
Change the default behavior of the klp test runner to save failing test
working directories instead of deleting them on failure. Provide a KEEP
Makefile variable that can optionally retain 'all' or 'none' of those
directories.
> diff --git a/tools/objtool/tests/lib.sh b/tools/objtool/tests/lib.sh
> index 4d8401ee8b412..6c607a0435023 100644
> --- a/tools/objtool/tests/lib.sh
> +++ b/tools/objtool/tests/lib.sh
[ ... ]
> @@ -186,12 +187,14 @@ cleanup()
> {
> [ -n "$workdir" ] || return 0
>
> - if [ -n "${KLP_TEST_KEEP:-}" ]; then
> - [ -n "${KLP_TEST_WORKDIR:-}" ] || echo "# kept $workdir"
> - return 0
> - fi
> -
> - rm -rf "$workdir"
[Severity: Medium]
When a test is executed standalone (not via run-tests.sh) and fails, does this
change silently leak the temporary directory without printing its path?
Before this patch, standalone test failures using KEEP=failed informed the
user of the generated /tmp directory path. Without the print statement,
developers might not be aware of the leaked directory location.
> + case "${KLP_TEST_KEEP:-failed}" in
> + all) return 0 ;;
> + none) rm -rf "$workdir" ;;
> + failed|*)
> + [ -n "${KLP_TEST_FAILED:-}" ] && return 0
> + rm -rf "$workdir"
[Severity: Medium]
If a test script exits unexpectedly without setting KLP_TEST_FAILED=1
(e.g., syntax error, shell error, or signal), will this incorrectly delete
the working directory despite KEEP=failed being set?
> + ;;
> + esac
> }
>
> # setup [exported symbol...]
> diff --git a/tools/objtool/tests/run-tests.sh b/tools/objtool/tests/run-tests.sh
> index e6f1ac1b5d0da..e7bd25097ea58 100755
> --- a/tools/objtool/tests/run-tests.sh
> +++ b/tools/objtool/tests/run-tests.sh
[ ... ]
> @@ -147,16 +162,16 @@ for t in "${tests[@]}"; do
> rest="$rest${rest:+$'\n'}was: $result"
> result="not ok - $(basename "$t" .sh): undeclared skip"
> result="$result (use gcc_only/clang_only or require_input_*)"
> - fail=$((fail + 1)) ;;
> + fail=$((fail + 1)); failed_dirs+=( "$rundir/${t%.sh}" ) ;;
> "not ok"*"# TODO"*) xfail=$((xfail + 1)) ;;
> - "ok"*"# TODO"*) xpass=$((xpass + 1)) ;;
> - "not ok"*) fail=$((fail + 1)) ;;
> + "ok"*"# TODO"*) xpass=$((xpass + 1)); failed_dirs+=( "$rundir/${t%.sh}" ) ;;
> + "not ok"*) fail=$((fail + 1)); failed_dirs+=( "$rundir/${t%.sh}" ) ;;
> "ok"*) pass=$((pass + 1)) ;;
> *)
> # No result line at all: the test died before reporting.
> rest="$rest${rest:+$'\n'}exited $rc without a result line"
> result="not ok - $(basename "$t" .sh): no TAP result"
> - fail=$((fail + 1)) ;;
> + fail=$((fail + 1)); failed_dirs+=( "$rundir/${t%.sh}" ) ;;
> esac
>
> echo "$result"
[ ... ]
> @@ -167,15 +182,35 @@ done
> echo "# pass:$pass fail:$fail static-skip:$static_skip" \
> "probe-skip:$probe_skip xfail:$xfail xpass:$xpass"
[ ... ]
> +failed)
> + if [ "${#failed_dirs[@]}" -gt 0 ]; then
> + echo "# keep=failed: ${#failed_dirs[@]} failing test(s) kept under $rundir:"
> + for d in "${failed_dirs[@]}"; do
> + echo "# ${d#"$rundir"/}/"
> + done
[Severity: Medium]
Will this instruct the user to inspect directories that have already been
wiped?
When a test crashes or skips without setting KLP_TEST_FAILED, the main loop in
run-tests.sh correctly detects this as a failure and adds it to failed_dirs.
However, cleanup() in lib.sh will have already deleted the directory because
KLP_TEST_FAILED is empty, leading to confusing instructions for the user.
> + echo "# inspect: diff.log readelf -S out.o"
> + echo "# one test: $PWD/run-tests.sh <name>"
> + echo "# cleanup: rm -rf $rundir"
> + elif ! rmdir "$rundir" 2>/dev/null; then
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260911185031.1534046-1-song@kernel.org?part=10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-11 18:42 [PATCH 00/58] Unit test framework for klp-build toolchain Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 01/58] objtool: Add test harness for the klp subcommands Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 02/58] objtool/klp: Check the klp test environment once, before any test Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 03/58] objtool/klp: Group the klp tests by architecture Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 04/58] objtool/klp: Classify klp test outcomes Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 05/58] objtool/klp: Build klp test fixtures through the harness Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 06/58] objtool/klp: Grow the klp test harness vocabulary Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 07/58] objtool/klp: Give each run one working directory, one per test inside it Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 08/58] objtool/klp: Run the klp tests under set -u Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 09/58] objtool/klp: Document the klp test harness Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 10/58] objtool: Keep failing test workdirs by default Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:07 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 11/58] objtool: Forward toolchain variables to the klp test runner Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 12/58] objtool/klp: Add test for rejecting changed data Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 13/58] objtool/klp: Add test for newly introduced data Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 14/58] objtool/klp: Add test for newly introduced functions Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 15/58] objtool/klp: Add test for static local correlation Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 16/58] objtool/klp: Add test for cold function halves Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 17/58] objtool/klp: Add test for special section extraction Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 18/58] objtool/klp: Add test for selective " Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 19/58] objtool/klp: Add test for jump table key relocations Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 20/58] objtool/klp: Add test for rejecting module-owned static branch keys Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 21/58] objtool/klp: Add test for rejecting module-owned static call keys Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 22/58] objtool/klp: Add test for symids in discarded sections Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 23/58] objtool/klp: Add test for rejecting references to init code/data Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 24/58] objtool/klp: Add test for correlation across ThinLTO name mangling Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:42 ` [PATCH 25/58] objtool/klp: Add test for objects without .modinfo Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:49 ` [PATCH 26/58] objtool/klp: Add test for unchecksummed input Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 27/58] objtool/klp: Add klp diff and post-link regression tests Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 28/58] objtool/klp: Add test for klp reloc section naming in module objects Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 29/58] objtool/klp: Add test for vmlinux relocs in a patched module Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 30/58] objtool/klp: Add test for Module.symvers path normalization Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 31/58] objtool/klp: Add test for the contents of the klp_funcs list Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 32/58] objtool/klp: Add test for EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES references Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 33/58] objtool/klp: Add test for new references to exported symbols Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 34/58] objtool/klp: Add test for empty x86 alternative replacements Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 35/58] objtool/klp: Add test for recorded checksum values Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 36/58] objtool/klp: Add test for position-independent checksums Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 37/58] objtool/klp: Add test for sympos in module objects Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 38/58] objtool/klp: Add test for sympos resolved against a linked vmlinux Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 39/58] objtool/klp: Add test for static locals which must not be correlated Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 40/58] objtool/klp: Add test for __bug_table, __ex_table and __mcount_loc extraction Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 41/58] objtool/klp: Add test for kCFI prefix symbols and traps Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 42/58] objtool/klp: Add test for symbols whose linkage the patch changes Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 43/58] objtool/klp: Test rejection of a file-local static branch key Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 44/58] objtool/klp: Test a hand-built livepatch module's static call keys Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 45/58] objtool/klp: Test text annotations on alternative replacements Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 46/58] objtool/klp: Add test for data object checksums Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 47/58] objtool/klp: Add test for symbols with no checksum entry of their own Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 48/58] objtool/klp: Add test for a static branch introduced by the patch Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 49/58] objtool/klp: Add test for tracepoint and pr_debug static branch keys Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 50/58] objtool/klp: Add test for a static call introduced by the patch Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 51/58] objtool/klp: Add test for instruction operand checksums Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 52/58] objtool/klp: Add test for alternative replacement code in checksums Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 53/58] objtool/klp: Add test for the alignment of cloned data sections Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 54/58] objtool/klp: Add test for a patch which strips a data annotation Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 55/58] objtool/klp: Add test for absolute and __ADDRESSABLE symbols Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 56/58] objtool/klp: Add test for UBSAN metadata in an unchanged function Song Liu
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 57/58] objtool/klp: Add test for Clang switch jump tables Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 58/58] objtool/klp: Add test for ThinLTO symbols sharing a demangled name Song Liu
2026-09-11 19:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-13 1:53 ` [PATCH 00/58] Unit test framework for klp-build toolchain Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260911190705.248B91F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.