* [PATCH] powerpc: remove unused audit_32.h header
@ 2026-09-18 3:08 Ethan Nelson-Moore
2026-09-18 6:20 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-09-18 7:11 ` Shrikanth Hegde
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ethan Nelson-Moore @ 2026-09-18 3:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Ellerman, Nicholas Piggin, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP),
Ritesh Harjani (IBM), Shrikanth Hegde, linuxppc-dev
Cc: Ethan Nelson-Moore, Madhavan Srinivasan
The last use of arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h was removed in
commit f26ad12356a2 ("powerpc/audit: Convert powerpc to
AUDIT_ARCH_COMPAT_GENERIC"), but it was left behind. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Ethan Nelson-Moore <enelsonmoore@gmail.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h b/arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h
deleted file mode 100644
index c6c79c3041ab..000000000000
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,7 +0,0 @@
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
-#ifndef __AUDIT_32_H__
-#define __AUDIT_32_H__
-
-extern int ppc32_classify_syscall(unsigned);
-
-#endif
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: remove unused audit_32.h header 2026-09-18 3:08 [PATCH] powerpc: remove unused audit_32.h header Ethan Nelson-Moore @ 2026-09-18 6:20 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 2026-09-18 7:11 ` Shrikanth Hegde 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) @ 2026-09-18 6:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ethan Nelson-Moore, Michael Ellerman, Nicholas Piggin, Ritesh Harjani (IBM), Shrikanth Hegde, linuxppc-dev Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan Le 18/09/2026 à 05:08, Ethan Nelson-Moore a écrit : > The last use of arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h was removed in > commit f26ad12356a2 ("powerpc/audit: Convert powerpc to > AUDIT_ARCH_COMPAT_GENERIC"), but it was left behind. Remove it. > > Signed-off-by: Ethan Nelson-Moore <enelsonmoore@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) <chleroy@kernel.org> > --- > arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h | 7 ------- > 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h b/arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h > deleted file mode 100644 > index c6c79c3041ab..000000000000 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1,7 +0,0 @@ > -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > -#ifndef __AUDIT_32_H__ > -#define __AUDIT_32_H__ > - > -extern int ppc32_classify_syscall(unsigned); > - > -#endif ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: remove unused audit_32.h header 2026-09-18 3:08 [PATCH] powerpc: remove unused audit_32.h header Ethan Nelson-Moore 2026-09-18 6:20 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) @ 2026-09-18 7:11 ` Shrikanth Hegde 2026-09-18 8:11 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Shrikanth Hegde @ 2026-09-18 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ethan Nelson-Moore, Michael Ellerman, Nicholas Piggin, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP), Ritesh Harjani (IBM), linuxppc-dev Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan On 9/18/26 8:38 AM, Ethan Nelson-Moore wrote: > The last use of arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h was removed in > commit f26ad12356a2 ("powerpc/audit: Convert powerpc to > AUDIT_ARCH_COMPAT_GENERIC"), but it was left behind. Remove it. > Does it need fixes tag, So that it can propagate correctly? Reviewed-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Ethan Nelson-Moore <enelsonmoore@gmail.com> > --- > arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h | 7 ------- > 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h b/arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h > deleted file mode 100644 > index c6c79c3041ab..000000000000 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1,7 +0,0 @@ > -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > -#ifndef __AUDIT_32_H__ > -#define __AUDIT_32_H__ > - > -extern int ppc32_classify_syscall(unsigned); > - > -#endif ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: remove unused audit_32.h header 2026-09-18 7:11 ` Shrikanth Hegde @ 2026-09-18 8:11 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 2026-09-18 8:51 ` Shrikanth Hegde 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) @ 2026-09-18 8:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shrikanth Hegde, Ethan Nelson-Moore, Michael Ellerman, Nicholas Piggin, Ritesh Harjani (IBM), linuxppc-dev Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan Hi Shrikanth, Le 18/09/2026 à 09:11, Shrikanth Hegde a écrit : > > > On 9/18/26 8:38 AM, Ethan Nelson-Moore wrote: >> The last use of arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h was removed in >> commit f26ad12356a2 ("powerpc/audit: Convert powerpc to >> AUDIT_ARCH_COMPAT_GENERIC"), but it was left behind. Remove it. >> > > Does it need fixes tag, So that it can propagate correctly? My understanding is that this patch is not a real bug fix so it doesn't qualify for -stable trees at the first place. Therefore it shouldn't contain a Fixes: tag. See https://docs.kernel.org/process/stable-kernel-rules.html : Rules on what kind of patches are accepted, and which ones are not, into the “-stable” tree: It or an equivalent fix must already exist in Linux mainline (upstream). It must be obviously correct and tested. It cannot be bigger than 100 lines, with context. It must follow the Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst rules. It must either fix a real bug that bothers people or just add a device ID. To elaborate on the former: It fixes a problem like an oops, a hang, data corruption, a real security issue, a hardware quirk, a build error (but not for things marked CONFIG_BROKEN), or some “oh, that’s not good” issue. Serious issues as reported by a user of a distribution kernel may also be considered if they fix a notable performance or interactivity issue. As these fixes are not as obvious and have a higher risk of a subtle regression they should only be submitted by a distribution kernel maintainer and include an addendum linking to a bugzilla entry if it exists and additional information on the user-visible impact. No “This could be a problem...” type of things like a “theoretical race condition”, unless an explanation of how the bug can be exploited is also provided. No “trivial” fixes without benefit for users (spelling changes, whitespace cleanups, etc). > > Reviewed-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Ethan Nelson-Moore <enelsonmoore@gmail.com> >> --- >> arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h | 7 ------- >> 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) >> delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h >> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ >> audit_32.h >> deleted file mode 100644 >> index c6c79c3041ab..000000000000 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h >> +++ /dev/null >> @@ -1,7 +0,0 @@ >> -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> -#ifndef __AUDIT_32_H__ >> -#define __AUDIT_32_H__ >> - >> -extern int ppc32_classify_syscall(unsigned); >> - >> -#endif > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: remove unused audit_32.h header 2026-09-18 8:11 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) @ 2026-09-18 8:51 ` Shrikanth Hegde 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Shrikanth Hegde @ 2026-09-18 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP), Ethan Nelson-Moore, Michael Ellerman, Nicholas Piggin, Ritesh Harjani (IBM), linuxppc-dev Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan On 9/18/26 1:41 PM, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) wrote: > Hi Shrikanth, > > Le 18/09/2026 à 09:11, Shrikanth Hegde a écrit : >> >> >> On 9/18/26 8:38 AM, Ethan Nelson-Moore wrote: >>> The last use of arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h was removed in >>> commit f26ad12356a2 ("powerpc/audit: Convert powerpc to >>> AUDIT_ARCH_COMPAT_GENERIC"), but it was left behind. Remove it. >>> >> >> Does it need fixes tag, So that it can propagate correctly? > > My understanding is that this patch is not a real bug fix so it doesn't qualify for -stable trees at the first place. Therefore it shouldn't contain a Fixes: tag. > > See https://docs.kernel.org/process/stable-kernel-rules.html : > > Rules on what kind of patches are accepted, and which ones are not, into the “-stable” tree: > > It or an equivalent fix must already exist in Linux mainline (upstream). > > It must be obviously correct and tested. > > It cannot be bigger than 100 lines, with context. > > It must follow the Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst rules. > > It must either fix a real bug that bothers people or just add a device ID. To elaborate on the former: > > It fixes a problem like an oops, a hang, data corruption, a real security issue, a hardware quirk, a build error (but not for things marked CONFIG_BROKEN), or some “oh, that’s not good” issue. > > Serious issues as reported by a user of a distribution kernel may also be considered if they fix a notable performance or interactivity issue. As these fixes are not as obvious and have a higher risk of a subtle regression they should only be submitted by a distribution kernel maintainer and include an addendum linking to a bugzilla entry if it exists and additional information on the user-visible impact. > > No “This could be a problem...” type of things like a “theoretical race condition”, unless an explanation of how the bug can be exploited is also provided. > > No “trivial” fixes without benefit for users (spelling changes, whitespace cleanups, etc). > > Alright. Makes sense. >> >> Reviewed-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com> >> >>> Signed-off-by: Ethan Nelson-Moore <enelsonmoore@gmail.com> >>> --- >>> arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h | 7 ------- >>> 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) >>> delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ audit_32.h >>> deleted file mode 100644 >>> index c6c79c3041ab..000000000000 >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/audit_32.h >>> +++ /dev/null >>> @@ -1,7 +0,0 @@ >>> -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >>> -#ifndef __AUDIT_32_H__ >>> -#define __AUDIT_32_H__ >>> - >>> -extern int ppc32_classify_syscall(unsigned); >>> - >>> -#endif >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-18 8:51 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-09-18 3:08 [PATCH] powerpc: remove unused audit_32.h header Ethan Nelson-Moore 2026-09-18 6:20 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 2026-09-18 7:11 ` Shrikanth Hegde 2026-09-18 8:11 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 2026-09-18 8:51 ` Shrikanth Hegde
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.