From: zjamg <ndaugoing@gmail.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yuchao Zhang <ndaugoing@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/1] KVM: arm64: vgic: fix UAF/crash on remote LPI disable
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 12:02:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918040214.85580-1-ndaugoing@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Yuchao Zhang <ndaugoing@gmail.com>
Hi Marc, Oliver, and KVM/arm64 maintainers,
By code inspection of commit 6da5e537f5af ("KVM: arm64: vgic: Pick EOIcount
deactivations from AP-list tail"), a race condition exists when a remote
vCPU disables LPIs while the target vCPU has an in-flight LPI in a List
Register (LR).
Specifically:
- vgic_flush_pending_lpis() unconditionally unlinks all LPIs from ap_list
without checking whether the interrupt is in an LR (irq->on_lr).
- If the LPI in the LR happened to be the last one populated, the per-CPU
pointer *host_data_ptr(last_lr_irq) on the target vCPU is left dangling.
- When the target vCPU exits guest mode, vgic_v3_fold_lr_state() starts
traversing ap_list via list_for_each_entry_continue() from this unlinked,
poisoned (or freed) last_lr_irq, leading to UAF or an immediate panic
when locking irq->irq_lock.
Solution & Scope:
This patch prevents unlinking LPIs that are currently on an LR in
vgic_flush_pending_lpis(), ensures *host_data_ptr(last_lr_irq) is cleared
after folding, skips the ap_list walk when eoicount is zero, and prevents
the fold from resurrecting the pending state of an edge LPI once the
redistributor has LPIs disabled.
Note: this closes the primary race (the last_lr_irq node itself is no
longer unlinkable while in-flight), but the fold traversal can still
race with a remote flush unlinking a subsequent non-LR node in the
ap_list tail. Fully closing that window needs the fold side to take
references before dropping locks (in the spirit of the prune-side fix
in commit 7258770e5814 ("KVM: arm64: vgic: Handle race between
interrupt affinity change and LPI disabling")) and is left as a
follow-up.
Changes in v2:
- Added the fold-side guard: vgic_v3_fold_lr() no longer preserves the
pending bit of an edge LPI folded while the redistributor has LPIs
disabled. Without this, a flushed in-flight LPI is resurrected from
the LR pending bit and re-injected while GICR_CTLR.EnableLPIs is 0
(spurious LPI delivery to the guest), since the injection path has no
lpis_enabled gate. Thanks to the Sashiko AI review for pointing this
out.
Yuchao Zhang (1):
KVM: arm64: vgic: Do not remove in-flight LPIs from AP list on disable
arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v2.c | 3 +++
arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c | 10 +++++++---
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 4:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 4:02 zjamg [this message]
2026-09-18 4:02 ` [PATCH v2] KVM: arm64: vgic: Do not remove in-flight LPIs from AP list on disable zjamg
2026-09-18 7:22 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-09-18 11:50 ` Yuchao Zhang
2026-09-18 11:58 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-09-18 19:15 ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-20 23:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-20 1:49 ` [PATCH v3 0/1] KVM: arm64: vgic: Drop last_lr_irq and serialize overflow EOI replay Yuchao Zhang
2026-09-20 1:49 ` [PATCH v3] " Yuchao Zhang
2026-09-20 23:47 ` [PATCH v3 0/1] " Marc Zyngier
2026-09-22 10:16 ` Yuchao Zhang
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH] KVM: selftests: arm64: Add test for cross-vCPU LPI disable race Yuchao Zhang
2026-09-22 10:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 10:53 ` Yuchao Zhang
2026-09-22 10:53 ` [PATCH v2] " Yuchao Zhang
2026-09-22 11:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 11:24 ` Yuchao Zhang
2026-09-22 17:08 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-09-22 17:05 ` [PATCH v3 0/1] KVM: arm64: vgic: Drop last_lr_irq and serialize overflow EOI replay Fuad Tabba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260918040214.85580-1-ndaugoing@gmail.com \
--to=ndaugoing@gmail.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.