From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/28] KVM: Take memory protections into account for memory read/write/fetch
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 08:34:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918083404.884F01F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918081543.139871-16-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] kvm: vcpu_map bypasses KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_NR/NW protections
--
commit 79f1cf1f5a4245adbef80d2c22573dcd13309746
Author: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@amazon.com>
KVM: Take memory protections into account for memory read/write/fetch
Take into account memory attributes when accessing guest memory through
the kvm_{read,write,fetch}*() family of functions.
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index c910beb7a3aa5..e3ea9ceed01ea 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -3395,6 +3409,10 @@ static int __kvm_write_guest_page(struct kvm *kvm,
> addr = gfn_to_hva_memslot(memslot, gfn);
> if (kvm_is_error_hva(addr))
> return -EFAULT;
> +
> + if (!kvm_mem_attributes_may_write_gfn(kvm, gfn))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> r = __copy_to_user((void __user *)addr + offset, data, len);
> if (r)
> return -EFAULT;
[Severity: High]
While this patch updates the read/write/fetch helpers, does it inadvertently
leave __kvm_vcpu_map() vulnerable to bypassing memory protections?
In virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:__kvm_vcpu_map(), KVM resolves and maps the PFN into
kernel space without checking KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_NR/NW memory attributes:
int __kvm_vcpu_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn, struct kvm_host_map *map,
bool writable)
{
...
map->pfn = kvm_follow_pfn(&kfp);
if (is_error_noslot_pfn(map->pfn))
return -EINVAL;
if (pfn_valid(map->pfn)) {
map->page = pfn_to_page(map->pfn);
map->hva = kmap(map->page);
...
}
If a malicious L1 guest provides a protected GPA (marked Non-Writable or
Non-Readable by host userspace via KVM_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES) to an interface
mapped via kvm_vcpu_map (such as a nested VMCS, VMCB, or APIC access page),
KVM will successfully read/write it outside the guest MMU. Can we check
kvm_get_memory_attributes() here before mapping to prevent KVM from acting
as a confused deputy and violating the host's memory protections?
While pfncache and cached offset accessors were explicitly fixed in follow-up
patches within this series (e.g., 'KVM: pfncache: Fail to refresh if it
contains memory protections' and 'KVM: Take memory protections into account
for accesses with cached gfn->hva'), __kvm_vcpu_map was missed.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260918081543.139871-1-pbonzini@redhat.com?part=15
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 8:15 [PATCH v2 00/28] KVM: x86: Introduce memory protection attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 01/28] KVM: selftests: Take into account mixed memory fault flags Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 02/28] KVM: Define and communicate KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT RWX flags to userspace Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 03/28] KVM: selftests: Test address translation for Hyper-V direct L2 hypercalls Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 04/28] KVM: apply nGPA->GPA translation to KVM_HC_CLOCK_PAIRING Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 05/28] KVM: x86: Introduce memory fault on invalid hypercalls reads/writes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 06/28] KVM: selftests: test hypercall memory fault exits Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 07/28] KVM: x86/mmu: intersect writability from __kvm_faultin_pfn with fault->map_writable Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 08/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend map_writable to a full ACC_* mask Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 09/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Init memslot hugepage information for non-private_mem VMs too Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 10/28] KVM: pass kvm == NULL case to kvm_arch_has_private_mem Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 11/28] KVM: adjust for presence of more than one attribute Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 12/28] KVM: Introduce NR/NW/NX memory attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 13/28] KVM: Include memory protections in result of gfn->hva conversion Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 14/28] KVM: Introduce kvm_fetch_guest_page() and use it for x86 Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 15/28] KVM: Take memory protections into account for memory read/write/fetch Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:34 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 16/28] KVM: Encapsulate memattrs array into anonymous struct Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 17/28] KVM: Introduce kvm_check_gen()/kvm_memslots_check_gen() Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 18/28] KVM: Introduce a generation number for memory attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 19/28] KVM: Take memory protections into account for accesses with cached gfn->hva Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 20/28] KVM: pfncache: Fail to refresh if it contains memory protections Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 21/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Take memory protection attributes into account during faults Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 22/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Issue memory fault exit if walk failed due to memory attribute Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 23/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Do not update accessed/dirty if guest PTE is read-only Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 24/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Do not prefetch sptes on gfns backed by memory attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 25/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Obsolete all roots if memattr contains gPTEs Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 26/28] KVM: x86: selftests: Introduce memory protection attributes test Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 27/28] KVM: x86: selftests: Introduce memory attributes PTE test Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 28/28] KVM: x86: selftests: Introduce memory attributes side-channel tests Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:43 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260918083404.884F01F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.