From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/28] KVM: apply nGPA->GPA translation to KVM_HC_CLOCK_PAIRING
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 08:34:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918083430.460C81F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918081543.139871-5-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] kvm: L2 VM escape via unaligned KVM_HC_CLOCK_PAIRING write
--
commit 852f8a2ef0b30977a5795285699a50deabf3525c
Author: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
KVM: apply nGPA->GPA translation to KVM_HC_CLOCK_PAIRING
This commit updates KVM_HC_CLOCK_PAIRING to translate the guest physical
address from an L2 address to an L1 address when running nested.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 79468ddfe4736..2b81e7a478c45 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -7217,6 +7217,11 @@ static int kvm_pv_clock_pairing(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t paddr,
> clock_pairing.flags = 0;
> memset(&clock_pairing.pad, 0, sizeof(clock_pairing.pad));
>
> + paddr = kvm_translate_gpa(vcpu, &vcpu->arch.gva_walk, paddr,
> + PFERR_WRITE_MASK | PFERR_GUEST_FINAL_MASK, NULL, 0);
[Severity: Critical]
Does this translation adequately handle the case where the struct crosses a
page boundary?
When kvm_translate_gpa() is called in kvm_pv_clock_pairing(), it only
translates the base L2 GPA. If an untrusted L2 guest provides an unaligned
guest physical address (for example, at offset 4033 in the page), the 64-byte
kvm_clock_pairing struct will span across two L2 pages.
> + if (paddr == INVALID_GPA)
> + return -KVM_EFAULT;
> +
> ret = 0;
> if (kvm_write_guest(vcpu->kvm, paddr, &clock_pairing,
> sizeof(struct kvm_clock_pairing)))
[Severity: Critical]
Could this regression lead to L1 memory corruption when crossing an L2 page
boundary?
Looking at kvm_write_guest() in virt/kvm/kvm_main.c, it writes linearly into
L1 physical address space. When a write hits a page boundary, it increments
the L1 GFN (++gfn) and continues writing to the next contiguous L1 page:
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:kvm_write_guest() {
...
while ((seg = next_segment(len, offset)) != 0) {
ret = kvm_write_guest_page(kvm, gfn, data, offset, seg);
...
++gfn;
}
...
}
Since contiguous L2 pages are not guaranteed to map to contiguous L1 pages,
incrementing the L1 GFN directly could write the remainder of the 64-byte
struct into an unrelated L1 page. This appears to allow an L2 guest to
overwrite up to 63 bytes of L1 memory.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260918081543.139871-1-pbonzini@redhat.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 8:15 [PATCH v2 00/28] KVM: x86: Introduce memory protection attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 01/28] KVM: selftests: Take into account mixed memory fault flags Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 02/28] KVM: Define and communicate KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT RWX flags to userspace Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 03/28] KVM: selftests: Test address translation for Hyper-V direct L2 hypercalls Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 04/28] KVM: apply nGPA->GPA translation to KVM_HC_CLOCK_PAIRING Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:34 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 05/28] KVM: x86: Introduce memory fault on invalid hypercalls reads/writes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 06/28] KVM: selftests: test hypercall memory fault exits Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 07/28] KVM: x86/mmu: intersect writability from __kvm_faultin_pfn with fault->map_writable Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 08/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend map_writable to a full ACC_* mask Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 09/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Init memslot hugepage information for non-private_mem VMs too Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 10/28] KVM: pass kvm == NULL case to kvm_arch_has_private_mem Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 11/28] KVM: adjust for presence of more than one attribute Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 12/28] KVM: Introduce NR/NW/NX memory attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 13/28] KVM: Include memory protections in result of gfn->hva conversion Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 14/28] KVM: Introduce kvm_fetch_guest_page() and use it for x86 Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 15/28] KVM: Take memory protections into account for memory read/write/fetch Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 16/28] KVM: Encapsulate memattrs array into anonymous struct Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 17/28] KVM: Introduce kvm_check_gen()/kvm_memslots_check_gen() Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 18/28] KVM: Introduce a generation number for memory attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 19/28] KVM: Take memory protections into account for accesses with cached gfn->hva Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 20/28] KVM: pfncache: Fail to refresh if it contains memory protections Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 21/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Take memory protection attributes into account during faults Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 22/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Issue memory fault exit if walk failed due to memory attribute Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 23/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Do not update accessed/dirty if guest PTE is read-only Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 24/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Do not prefetch sptes on gfns backed by memory attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 25/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Obsolete all roots if memattr contains gPTEs Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 26/28] KVM: x86: selftests: Introduce memory protection attributes test Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 27/28] KVM: x86: selftests: Introduce memory attributes PTE test Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 28/28] KVM: x86: selftests: Introduce memory attributes side-channel tests Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 8:43 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260918083430.460C81F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.