From: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Andreas Grapentin <gra@linux.ibm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Friedrich Welter <fritz@linux.ibm.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>, Gautam Gala <ggala@linux.ibm.com>,
Hariharan Mari <hari55@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.ibm.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <oss@nina.schoetterlglausch.eu>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 13/29] KVM: arm64: Access elements of vcpu_gp_regs individually
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 15:30:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918133107.1042730-14-seiden@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918133107.1042730-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com>
While for arm64 the members of vcpu_gp_regs are allocated continuous
this is not necessarily true for other architectures implementing ARM.
Let vcpu_gp_regs() no longer return the address of the user_pt_regs in
the vcpu context but the address of the gp-register array field in the
user_pt_reg struct. Note, this change semantically excludes pc from the
GPRs.
No functional change.
Co-developed-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 14 ++++++++------
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 2 +-
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c | 4 ++--
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/adjust_pc.h | 4 ++--
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h | 4 ++--
6 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index a3c1928bdf74..8603766c1b4d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -133,12 +133,12 @@ static inline void vcpu_set_vsesr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 vsesr)
static __always_inline unsigned long *vcpu_pc(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- return (unsigned long *)&vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->pc;
+ return (unsigned long *)&vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.pc;
}
static __always_inline unsigned long *vcpu_cpsr(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- return (unsigned long *)&vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->pstate;
+ return (unsigned long *)&vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.pstate;
}
static __always_inline bool vcpu_mode_is_32bit(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -167,14 +167,14 @@ static inline void vcpu_set_thumb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static __always_inline unsigned long vcpu_get_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
u8 reg_num)
{
- return (reg_num == 31) ? 0 : vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->regs[reg_num];
+ return (reg_num == 31) ? 0 : vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)[reg_num];
}
static __always_inline void vcpu_set_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 reg_num,
unsigned long val)
{
if (reg_num != 31)
- vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->regs[reg_num] = val;
+ vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)[reg_num] = val;
}
static inline bool vcpu_is_el2_ctxt(const struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
@@ -750,13 +750,15 @@ static inline void kvm_reset_vcpu_core(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL1;
/* Reset core registers */
- memset(vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu), 0, sizeof(*vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)));
+ memset(vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu), 0, sizeof(vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)));
+ *vcpu_pc(vcpu) = 0;
+ vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.sp = 0;
memset(&vcpu->arch.ctxt.fp_regs, 0, sizeof(vcpu->arch.ctxt.fp_regs));
vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_abt = 0;
vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_und = 0;
vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_irq = 0;
vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_fiq = 0;
- vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->pstate = pstate;
+ *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) = pstate;
}
/* PSCI reset handling for a vcpu. */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 9c314d0568b1..fc0037efa0b4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -1161,7 +1161,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
#define vcpu_clear_on_unsupported_cpu(vcpu) \
vcpu_clear_flag(vcpu, ON_UNSUPPORTED_CPU)
-#define vcpu_gp_regs(v) (&(v)->arch.ctxt.regs)
+#define vcpu_gp_regs(v) ((v)->arch.ctxt.regs.regs)
/*
* Only use __vcpu_sys_reg/ctxt_sys_reg if you know you want the
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
index b01d6622b872..81d850d5a328 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static void *core_reg_addr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.regs[30]):
off -= KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.regs[0]);
off /= 2;
- return &vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.regs[off];
+ return &vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)[off];
case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.sp):
return &vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.sp;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c
index 754e2dc1df54..0640c9ccaa3c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c
@@ -276,12 +276,12 @@ static void enter_exception32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 mode, u32 vect_offset)
switch(mode) {
case PSR_AA32_MODE_ABT:
__vcpu_write_spsr_abt(vcpu, host_spsr_to_spsr32(spsr));
- vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->compat_lr_abt = return_address;
+ vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)[__compat_lr_abt] = return_address;
break;
case PSR_AA32_MODE_UND:
__vcpu_write_spsr_und(vcpu, host_spsr_to_spsr32(spsr));
- vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->compat_lr_und = return_address;
+ vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)[__compat_lr_und] = return_address;
break;
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/adjust_pc.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/adjust_pc.h
index 4fdfeabefeb4..a049983bd5c3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/adjust_pc.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/adjust_pc.h
@@ -33,11 +33,11 @@ static inline void kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static inline void __kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
*vcpu_pc(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_ELR);
- vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->pstate = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_SPSR);
+ *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_SPSR);
kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
- write_sysreg_el2(vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->pstate, SYS_SPSR);
+ write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu), SYS_SPSR);
write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), SYS_ELR);
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
index 1ce7130e2549..a2a054fec2e2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
@@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ static inline bool kvm_hyp_handle_mops(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
u64 spsr;
*vcpu_pc(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_ELR);
- arm64_mops_reset_regs(vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu), vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2);
+ arm64_mops_reset_regs(&vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs, vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2);
write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), SYS_ELR);
/*
@@ -902,7 +902,7 @@ static inline void synchronize_vcpu_pstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
/*
* Check for the conditions of Cortex-A510's #2077057. When these occur
* SPSR_EL2 can't be trusted, but isn't needed either as it is
- * unchanged from the value in vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->pstate.
+ * unchanged from the value in vcpu_cpsr(vcpu).
* Are we single-stepping the guest, and took a PAC exception from the
* active-not-pending state?
*/
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 13:30 [PATCH v8 00/29] KVM: s390: Introduce arm64 KVM Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 01/29] KVM: Introduce file_to_kvm_<arch>() infrastructure Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 13:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 02/29] KVM: Add file back-pointer to struct kvm Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 13:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 03/29] KVM: x86: Use file_to_kvm_x86() in SEV Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 14:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 04/29] KVM/vfio: Use file-based reference counting for KVM Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 14:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 05/29] KVM: Restrict kvm_get_kvm/kvm_put_kvm export to internal KVM modules Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 14:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 06/29] KVM: Move export symbol check macros to Makefile.kvm Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 14:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 07/29] KVM: Make device name configurable Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 14:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 08/29] KVM: Move architecture capability Kconfigs to header defines Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 15:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 7:09 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 09/29] KVM: Replace CONFIG_KVM_MMIO with KVM_NO_MMIO Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 15:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 10/29] arm64: Use proper include variant Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 15:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 14:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-09-18 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 11/29] arm64: ptrace: Use constants for compat register numbers Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 15:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 14:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-09-18 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 12/29] arm64: sysreg: Convert SPSR_ELx to automatic register generation Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 15:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 15:08 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-09-28 15:36 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 13:30 ` Steffen Eiden [this message]
2026-09-18 15:28 ` [PATCH v8 13/29] KVM: arm64: Access elements of vcpu_gp_regs individually sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 14/29] KVM: arm64: Use accessor functions for core regs Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 15:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 15/29] arm64: Prepare sharing arm64 headers with s390 Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 15:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 15:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-09-18 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 16/29] arm64: Share " Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 15:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 16:07 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-09-28 16:23 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-09-29 4:19 ` Andreas Grapentin
2026-09-29 17:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-09-30 7:28 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-09-30 7:55 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-30 8:18 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-30 8:53 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 17/29] KVM: arm64: Share arm64 code " Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 16:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 18/29] s390/tools: Use arm64 headers Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 16:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 19/29] KVM: s390: Use arm64 code Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 16:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 20/29] s390: Introduce Start Arm Execution instruction Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 16:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 15:53 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2026-09-28 16:15 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-09-28 16:18 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2026-09-18 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 21/29] KVM: s390: arm64: Introduce host definitions Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 16:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 22/29] s390/hwcaps: Report SAE support as hwcap Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 16:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 15:58 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2026-09-18 13:31 ` [PATCH v8 23/29] KVM: s390: Add basic arm64 kvm module Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 17:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 14:15 ` Hendrik Brueckner
2026-09-28 14:22 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 13:31 ` [PATCH v8 24/29] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement required functions Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 17:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:31 ` [PATCH v8 25/29] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement vm/vcpu create destroy Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 17:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:31 ` [PATCH v8 26/29] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement vCPU IOCTLs Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 17:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:31 ` [PATCH v8 27/29] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement basic page fault handler Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 17:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:31 ` [PATCH v8 28/29] KVM: s390: arm64: Integrate arm on s390 Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 18:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:31 ` [PATCH v8 29/29] KVM: s390: Enforce no unexpected external symbol exports in s390 KVM Steffen Eiden
2026-09-18 18:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:38 ` [PATCH v8 00/29] KVM: s390: Introduce arm64 KVM Steffen Eiden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260918133107.1042730-14-seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--to=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=brueckner@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=fritz@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ggala@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gra@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hari55@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=oss@nina.schoetterlglausch.eu \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.