From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/31] KVM: x86/mmu: Issue memory fault exit if walk failed due to memory attribute
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 14:46:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918144700.4ADE51F00898@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918135030.171564-27-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] kvm: x86/mmu: lost memory attribute fault on GVA to GPA translation during emulation
--
commit a5b7ea3b514c528d86717bda8577133bab95a9d8
Author: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@amazon.com>
KVM: x86/mmu: Issue memory fault exit if walk failed due to memory attribute
This commit modifies the guest page table walk to issue a user-space
memory fault exit if it fails due to memory attributes, instead of
injecting a page fault. It introduces the memory_attributes_fault
flag to the guest_walker structure.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
> index b031123fcb369..cd055bfb1eb6b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
[ ... ]
> @@ -820,6 +831,12 @@ static int FNAME(page_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault
> * The page is not mapped by the guest. Let the guest handle it.
> */
> if (!r) {
> + if (walker.memory_attributes_fault) {
> + kvm_prepare_memory_fault_exit(vcpu, walker.gfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
> + PAGE_SIZE, false, false, false);
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> +
> if (!fault->prefetch)
> __kvm_inject_emulated_page_fault(vcpu, &walker.fault, true);
[Severity: High]
Does FNAME(gva_to_gpa)() also need to handle the new memory_attributes_fault
flag?
FNAME(gva_to_gpa)() uses a local walker to translate guest virtual addresses
by calling FNAME(walk_addr_generic)():
static gpa_t FNAME(gva_to_gpa)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_pagewalk *w,
gpa_t addr, u64 access,
struct x86_exception *exception)
{
struct guest_walker walker;
gpa_t gpa = INVALID_GPA;
int r;
[ ... ]
r = FNAME(walk_addr_generic)(&walker, vcpu, w, addr, access);
if (r) {
gpa = gfn_to_gpa(walker.gfn);
gpa |= addr & ~PAGE_MASK;
} else if (exception)
*exception = walker.fault;
return gpa;
}
If FNAME(walk_addr_generic)() detects a memory attribute fault when reading
guest page tables, it returns 0 with walker.memory_attributes_fault set.
However, FNAME(gva_to_gpa)() appears to ignore the new flag and only copies
walker.fault to the output exception.
Can this result in the instruction emulator improperly injecting a spurious
page fault into the guest instead of exiting to userspace with
KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT when guest page tables reside in memory restricted by
KVM memory attributes?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260918135030.171564-2-pbonzini@redhat.com?part=26
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 13:49 [PATCH v3 00/28] KVM: x86: Introduce memory protection attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 01/31] KVM: x86/hyperv: do not overwrite hc->ingpa for slow SIGNAL_EVENT hypercall Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 02/31] KVM: selftests: Take into account mixed memory fault flags Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 03/31] KVM: Define and communicate KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT RWX flags to userspace Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 04/31] KVM: selftests: Test address translation for Hyper-V direct L2 hypercalls Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 05/31] KVM: apply nGPA->GPA translation to KVM_HC_CLOCK_PAIRING Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 06/31] KVM: x86: Introduce memory fault on invalid hypercalls reads/writes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 14:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 16:56 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 07/31] KVM: selftests: test hypercall memory fault exits Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 08/31] KVM: x86/mmu: intersect writability from __kvm_faultin_pfn with fault->map_writable Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 09/31] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend map_writable to a full ACC_* mask Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 10/31] KVM: x86/mmu: Init memslot hugepage information for non-private_mem VMs too Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 11/31] KVM: pass kvm == NULL case to kvm_arch_has_private_mem Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 12/31] KVM: adjust for presence of more than one attribute Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 13/31] KVM: Introduce NR/NW/NX memory attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 14/31] KVM: Include memory protections in result of gfn->hva conversion Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 15/31] KVM: Introduce kvm_fetch_guest_page() and use it for x86 Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 16/31] KVM: Take memory protections into account for memory read/write/fetch Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 17/31] KVM: Take memory protections into account for __kvm_vcpu_map Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 18/31] KVM: Encapsulate memattrs array into anonymous struct Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 19/31] KVM: loongarch: do full validity check on the gfn-to-hva cache Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 20/31] KVM: Introduce kvm_check_gen()/kvm_memslots_check_gen() Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 14:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 21/31] KVM: Introduce a generation number for memory attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 14:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 22/31] KVM: Take memory protections into account for accesses with cached gfn->hva Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 14:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 23/31] KVM: pfncache: Fail to refresh if it contains memory protections Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 24/31] KVM: x86/mmu: Do not prefetch sptes on gfns backed by memory attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 25/31] KVM: x86/mmu: Take memory protection attributes into account during faults Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 14:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 26/31] KVM: x86/mmu: Issue memory fault exit if walk failed due to memory attribute Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 14:46 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 27/31] KVM: let kvm_arch_post_set_memory_attributes drop mmu_lock Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 28/31] KVM: x86/mmu: Obsolete all roots if memattr contains gPTEs Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 14:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 29/31] KVM: x86: selftests: Introduce memory protection attributes test Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 30/31] KVM: x86: selftests: Introduce memory attributes PTE test Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 31/31] KVM: x86: selftests: Introduce memory attributes side-channel tests Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 14:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 00/28] KVM: x86: Introduce memory protection attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-21 16:56 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260918144700.4ADE51F00898@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.