All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net] amt: do not store tunnel pointer in skb control block
@ 2026-08-18 16:48 Cen Zhang (Microsoft)
  2026-08-20 13:18 ` Taehee Yoo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Cen Zhang (Microsoft) @ 2026-08-18 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ap420073, andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni
  Cc: horms, netdev, linux-kernel, AutonomousCodeSecurity, xmei5,
	tgopinath, kys, blbllhy

An skb queued in a qdisc can outlive the tunnel it references
through a raw pointer in skb->cb. For example, a netem delay of
180s exceeds the default tunnel lifetime of 135s (igmp_qrv=1);
when the tunnel expires and is freed, the subsequent dequeue
triggers a use-after-free in amt_dev_xmit().

  BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in amt_dev_xmit+0x2763/0x2e20
  Call Trace:
   amt_dev_xmit+0x2763/0x2e20 [drivers/net/amt.c:1262]
   dev_hard_start_xmit+0x22f/0x620
   sch_direct_xmit+0x12e/0xac0
   netem_dequeue+0x333/0xc50
   net_tx_action+0x35c/0xa60

Store the tunnel identity (ip4 + source_port) in skb->cb instead
of a pointer, and re-lookup the tunnel under RCU in amt_dev_xmit().
If the tunnel is gone, the query is simply dropped.

Fixes: cbc21dc1cfe9 ("amt: add data plane of amt interface")
Reported-by: AutonomousCodeSecurity@microsoft.com
Reported-by: Xiang Mei (Microsoft) <xmei5@asu.edu>
Reported-by: Cen Zhang (Microsoft) <blbllhy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cen Zhang (Microsoft) <blbllhy@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/amt.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 include/net/amt.h |  4 +++-
 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/amt.c b/drivers/net/amt.c
index 182a41d59a75..a85ba0dfe18a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/amt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/amt.c
@@ -789,6 +789,18 @@ static void amt_send_request(struct amt_dev *amt, bool v6)
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
+static struct amt_tunnel_list *amt_lookup_tunnel(struct amt_dev *amt,
+						 __be32 ip4, __be16 source_port)
+{
+	struct amt_tunnel_list *tunnel;
+
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(tunnel, &amt->tunnel_list, list)
+		if (tunnel->ip4 == ip4 && tunnel->source_port == source_port)
+			return tunnel;
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
 static void amt_send_igmp_gq(struct amt_dev *amt,
 			     struct amt_tunnel_list *tunnel)
 {
@@ -798,7 +810,8 @@ static void amt_send_igmp_gq(struct amt_dev *amt,
 	if (!skb)
 		return;
 
-	amt_skb_cb(skb)->tunnel = tunnel;
+	amt_skb_cb(skb)->tunnel_ip4 = tunnel->ip4;
+	amt_skb_cb(skb)->tunnel_port = tunnel->source_port;
 	dev_queue_xmit(skb);
 }
 
@@ -883,7 +896,8 @@ static void amt_send_mld_gq(struct amt_dev *amt, struct amt_tunnel_list *tunnel)
 	if (!skb)
 		return;
 
-	amt_skb_cb(skb)->tunnel = tunnel;
+	amt_skb_cb(skb)->tunnel_ip4 = tunnel->ip4;
+	amt_skb_cb(skb)->tunnel_port = tunnel->source_port;
 	dev_queue_xmit(skb);
 }
 #else
@@ -1259,15 +1273,21 @@ static netdev_tx_t amt_dev_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 		goto unlock;
 	} else if (amt->mode == AMT_MODE_RELAY) {
 		if (query) {
-			tunnel = amt_skb_cb(skb)->tunnel;
+			rcu_read_lock();
+			tunnel = amt_lookup_tunnel(amt,
+						   amt_skb_cb(skb)->tunnel_ip4,
+						   amt_skb_cb(skb)->tunnel_port);
 			if (!tunnel) {
-				WARN_ON(1);
+				rcu_read_unlock();
 				goto free;
 			}
 
 			/* Do not forward unexpected query */
-			if (amt_send_membership_query(amt, skb, tunnel, v6))
+			if (amt_send_membership_query(amt, skb, tunnel, v6)) {
+				rcu_read_unlock();
 				goto free;
+			}
+			rcu_read_unlock();
 			goto unlock;
 		}
 
diff --git a/include/net/amt.h b/include/net/amt.h
index a0255491f5b0..59c4bb88fb1e 100644
--- a/include/net/amt.h
+++ b/include/net/amt.h
@@ -231,8 +231,10 @@ struct amt_relay_headers {
 	};
 } __packed;
 
+/* Tunnel identity for re-lookup; do not store a pointer here. */
 struct amt_skb_cb {
-	struct amt_tunnel_list *tunnel;
+	__be32			tunnel_ip4;
+	__be16			tunnel_port;
 };
 
 struct amt_tunnel_list {
-- 
2.52.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net] amt: do not store tunnel pointer in skb control block
  2026-08-18 16:48 [PATCH net] amt: do not store tunnel pointer in skb control block Cen Zhang (Microsoft)
@ 2026-08-20 13:18 ` Taehee Yoo
  2026-08-26  4:15   ` Cen Zhang (Microsoft)
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Taehee Yoo @ 2026-08-20 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Cen Zhang (Microsoft)
  Cc: andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, horms, netdev,
	linux-kernel, AutonomousCodeSecurity, xmei5, tgopinath, kys

On Wed, Aug 19, 2026 at 1:48 AM Cen Zhang (Microsoft) <blbllhy@gmail.com> wrote:
>

Hi Cen Zhang,
Thanks a lot for this work!

> An skb queued in a qdisc can outlive the tunnel it references
> through a raw pointer in skb->cb. For example, a netem delay of
> 180s exceeds the default tunnel lifetime of 135s (igmp_qrv=1);
> when the tunnel expires and is freed, the subsequent dequeue
> triggers a use-after-free in amt_dev_xmit().
>
>   BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in amt_dev_xmit+0x2763/0x2e20
>   Call Trace:
>    amt_dev_xmit+0x2763/0x2e20 [drivers/net/amt.c:1262]
>    dev_hard_start_xmit+0x22f/0x620
>    sch_direct_xmit+0x12e/0xac0
>    netem_dequeue+0x333/0xc50
>    net_tx_action+0x35c/0xa60
>
> Store the tunnel identity (ip4 + source_port) in skb->cb instead
> of a pointer, and re-lookup the tunnel under RCU in amt_dev_xmit().
> If the tunnel is gone, the query is simply dropped.
>
> Fixes: cbc21dc1cfe9 ("amt: add data plane of amt interface")
> Reported-by: AutonomousCodeSecurity@microsoft.com
> Reported-by: Xiang Mei (Microsoft) <xmei5@asu.edu>
> Reported-by: Cen Zhang (Microsoft) <blbllhy@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cen Zhang (Microsoft) <blbllhy@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/amt.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  include/net/amt.h |  4 +++-
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/amt.c b/drivers/net/amt.c
> index 182a41d59a75..a85ba0dfe18a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/amt.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/amt.c
> @@ -789,6 +789,18 @@ static void amt_send_request(struct amt_dev *amt, bool v6)
>         rcu_read_unlock();
>  }
>
> +static struct amt_tunnel_list *amt_lookup_tunnel(struct amt_dev *amt,
> +                                                __be32 ip4, __be16 source_port)
> +{
> +       struct amt_tunnel_list *tunnel;
> +
> +       list_for_each_entry_rcu(tunnel, &amt->tunnel_list, list)
> +               if (tunnel->ip4 == ip4 && tunnel->source_port == source_port)
> +                       return tunnel;
> +
> +       return NULL;
> +}

This looks like it adds a per-packet linear scan over all tunnels,
so I'm concerned about performance when there are many tunnels.
Do you have any idea how to avoid this regression?

> +
>  static void amt_send_igmp_gq(struct amt_dev *amt,
>                              struct amt_tunnel_list *tunnel)
>  {
> @@ -798,7 +810,8 @@ static void amt_send_igmp_gq(struct amt_dev *amt,
>         if (!skb)
>                 return;
>
> -       amt_skb_cb(skb)->tunnel = tunnel;
> +       amt_skb_cb(skb)->tunnel_ip4 = tunnel->ip4;
> +       amt_skb_cb(skb)->tunnel_port = tunnel->source_port;
>         dev_queue_xmit(skb);
>  }
>
> @@ -883,7 +896,8 @@ static void amt_send_mld_gq(struct amt_dev *amt, struct amt_tunnel_list *tunnel)
>         if (!skb)
>                 return;
>
> -       amt_skb_cb(skb)->tunnel = tunnel;
> +       amt_skb_cb(skb)->tunnel_ip4 = tunnel->ip4;
> +       amt_skb_cb(skb)->tunnel_port = tunnel->source_port;
>         dev_queue_xmit(skb);
>  }
>  #else
> @@ -1259,15 +1273,21 @@ static netdev_tx_t amt_dev_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>                 goto unlock;
>         } else if (amt->mode == AMT_MODE_RELAY) {
>                 if (query) {
> -                       tunnel = amt_skb_cb(skb)->tunnel;
> +                       rcu_read_lock();
> +                       tunnel = amt_lookup_tunnel(amt,
> +                                                  amt_skb_cb(skb)->tunnel_ip4,
> +                                                  amt_skb_cb(skb)->tunnel_port);
>                         if (!tunnel) {
> -                               WARN_ON(1);
> +                               rcu_read_unlock();
>                                 goto free;
>                         }
>
>                         /* Do not forward unexpected query */
> -                       if (amt_send_membership_query(amt, skb, tunnel, v6))
> +                       if (amt_send_membership_query(amt, skb, tunnel, v6)) {
> +                               rcu_read_unlock();
>                                 goto free;
> +                       }
> +                       rcu_read_unlock();
>                         goto unlock;
>                 }
>
> diff --git a/include/net/amt.h b/include/net/amt.h
> index a0255491f5b0..59c4bb88fb1e 100644
> --- a/include/net/amt.h
> +++ b/include/net/amt.h
> @@ -231,8 +231,10 @@ struct amt_relay_headers {
>         };
>  } __packed;
>
> +/* Tunnel identity for re-lookup; do not store a pointer here. */

I think this comment is not necessary. Please remove it.

>  struct amt_skb_cb {
> -       struct amt_tunnel_list *tunnel;
> +       __be32                  tunnel_ip4;
> +       __be16                  tunnel_port;
>  };
>
>  struct amt_tunnel_list {
> --
> 2.52.0
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net] amt: do not store tunnel pointer in skb control block
  2026-08-20 13:18 ` Taehee Yoo
@ 2026-08-26  4:15   ` Cen Zhang (Microsoft)
  2026-08-26 12:56     ` Taehee Yoo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Cen Zhang (Microsoft) @ 2026-08-26  4:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ap420073
  Cc: AutonomousCodeSecurity, andrew+netdev, blbllhy, davem, edumazet,
	horms, kuba, kys, linux-kernel, netdev, pabeni, tgopinath, xmei5

Thanks for the feedback. Just getting back to this thread.

On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 10:18:43PM +0900, Taehee Yoo wrote:
> This looks like it adds a per-packet linear scan over all tunnels,
> so I'm concerned about performance when there are many tunnels.
> Do you have any idea how to avoid this regression?

I see two possible approaches:

1. Keep the v1 implementation. It is the simplest fix, but changes the
   Query dequeue path from an O(1) pointer access to an O(n) lookup. I am
   not sure whether that cost is significant in practice for two reasons:
   this handles IGMP/MLD Query control packets rather than multicast data
   packets [1], while the hotter multicast data path already walks
   tunnel_list for each skb [2]; and max_tunnels defaults to 128. However,
   max_tunnels is configurable, so users can set it much higher.

2. Add a small per-device bucket hash keyed by (ip4, source_port) to [1],
   while keeping tunnel_list for multicast fan-out in [2]. This avoids
   a new linear lookup cost, but adds a second index that must be
   maintained during tunnel creation, expiry, and device teardown.
   I am not sure whether that is overkill for this fix.

I would appreciate your further feedback here and will prepare v2 after
settling on the approach.

> I think this comment is not necessary. Please remove it.

Agreed. I will remove it in v2.

[1] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/0f23d56f17fdfc7db69d51f64c8b91bbab947aa9/drivers/net/amt.c#L1261
[2] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/0f23d56f17fdfc7db69d51f64c8b91bbab947aa9/drivers/net/amt.c#L1276

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net] amt: do not store tunnel pointer in skb control block
  2026-08-26  4:15   ` Cen Zhang (Microsoft)
@ 2026-08-26 12:56     ` Taehee Yoo
  2026-09-22 21:19       ` Cen Zhang (Microsoft Security FORGE Labs)
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Taehee Yoo @ 2026-08-26 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Cen Zhang (Microsoft)
  Cc: AutonomousCodeSecurity, andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet, horms,
	kuba, kys, linux-kernel, netdev, pabeni, tgopinath, xmei5

On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 1:15 PM Cen Zhang (Microsoft) <blbllhy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the feedback. Just getting back to this thread.
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 10:18:43PM +0900, Taehee Yoo wrote:
> > This looks like it adds a per-packet linear scan over all tunnels,
> > so I'm concerned about performance when there are many tunnels.
> > Do you have any idea how to avoid this regression?
>
> I see two possible approaches:
>
> 1. Keep the v1 implementation. It is the simplest fix, but changes the
>    Query dequeue path from an O(1) pointer access to an O(n) lookup. I am
>    not sure whether that cost is significant in practice for two reasons:
>    this handles IGMP/MLD Query control packets rather than multicast data
>    packets [1], while the hotter multicast data path already walks
>    tunnel_list for each skb [2]; and max_tunnels defaults to 128. However,
>    max_tunnels is configurable, so users can set it much higher.
>
> 2. Add a small per-device bucket hash keyed by (ip4, source_port) to [1],
>    while keeping tunnel_list for multicast fan-out in [2]. This avoids
>    a new linear lookup cost, but adds a second index that must be
>    maintained during tunnel creation, expiry, and device teardown.
>    I am not sure whether that is overkill for this fix.
>
> I would appreciate your further feedback here and will prepare v2 after
> settling on the approach.

Thanks for the investigation.

How about protecting amt_tunnel_list with a refcount?
Currently amt_tunnel_expire() frees the tunnel immediately, but with a
refcount we could just drop the reference there and let the memory be
freed once it reaches 0.

What do you think?

>
> > I think this comment is not necessary. Please remove it.
>
> Agreed. I will remove it in v2.
>
> [1] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/0f23d56f17fdfc7db69d51f64c8b91bbab947aa9/drivers/net/amt.c#L1261
> [2] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/0f23d56f17fdfc7db69d51f64c8b91bbab947aa9/drivers/net/amt.c#L1276

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net] amt: do not store tunnel pointer in skb control block
  2026-08-26 12:56     ` Taehee Yoo
@ 2026-09-22 21:19       ` Cen Zhang (Microsoft Security FORGE Labs)
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Cen Zhang (Microsoft Security FORGE Labs) @ 2026-09-22 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ap420073
  Cc: AutonomousCodeSecurity, andrew+netdev, blbllhy, davem, edumazet,
	horms, kuba, kys, linux-kernel, netdev, pabeni, tgopinath, xmei5

On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 09:56:35PM +0900, Taehee Yoo wrote:
> How about protecting amt_tunnel_list with a refcount?
> Currently amt_tunnel_expire() frees the tunnel immediately, but with a
> refcount we could just drop the reference there and let the memory be
> freed once it reaches 0.
>
> What do you think?

Sorry for the late reply, I was busy with something else and am back
on this now.

I checked this for a while and I believe we cannot keep a refcount
balanced from skb->cb: once the skb enters the qdisc/tc layer it can
be dropped, cloned or orphaned before it reaches amt_dev_xmit(),
depending on the user's qdisc/tc commands. So a put inside
amt_dev_xmit() cannot be balanced against the get taken before
queueing, and the tunnel would either leak or be freed early.

I will send a v2 with the comment removed, from my corporate address
cenzhang@linux.microsoft.com.

Thanks,
Cen

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-22 21:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-18 16:48 [PATCH net] amt: do not store tunnel pointer in skb control block Cen Zhang (Microsoft)
2026-08-20 13:18 ` Taehee Yoo
2026-08-26  4:15   ` Cen Zhang (Microsoft)
2026-08-26 12:56     ` Taehee Yoo
2026-09-22 21:19       ` Cen Zhang (Microsoft Security FORGE Labs)

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.