From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Alexei Starovoitov" <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 12/17] libbpf: Resolve pointers to functions in read-only data
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 03:27:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924032759.3CE1A1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924031042.1690890-13-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] bpf: exception callbacks bypass callx and func ptr evaluation
--
commit 977905067f5778d4a89e59b4be93e1e229b29d4a
Author: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
libbpf: Resolve pointers to functions in read-only data
This patch enables libbpf to resolve pointers to static functions located in
read-only data, such as struct ops or vtables. It creates per-program map copies
containing the proper offsets, which the kernel later replaces with addresses.
Programs utilizing callx automatically have statically referenced subprograms
appended during relocation.
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index cd1ea1bb53cbf..fc9b7540aca63 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -7046,7 +7301,7 @@ bpf_object__relocate_calls(struct bpf_object *obj, struct bpf_program *prog)
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> - return 0;
> + return bpf_object__append_func_ptrs(obj, prog);
> }
>
[Severity: Medium]
Will this miss callx instructions and function pointers used inside exception
callbacks?
Looking at bpf_object__relocate() in tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c,
bpf_object__relocate_calls() is executed before exception callbacks are
appended:
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c:bpf_object__relocate() {
...
err = bpf_object__relocate_calls(obj, prog);
if (err) {
...
}
err = bpf_prog_assign_exc_cb(obj, prog);
if (err)
return err;
if (prog->exception_cb_idx >= 0) {
...
if (subprog->sub_insn_off == 0) {
err = bpf_object__append_subprog_code(obj, prog, subprog);
...
}
}
...
}
If the exception callback contains a callx instruction or references a function
pointer map, it seems they would bypass the bpf_object__append_func_ptrs()
evaluation. This could cause their read-only maps to be mis-relocated since
the has_callx state and subprogram appending are finalized prior to processing
the exception callback.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260924031042.1690890-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com?part=12
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 3:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 3:10 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/17] bpf: Indirect calls of bpf subprogs (callx) Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-24 3:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/17] bpf: Fix infinite loop in check_max_stack_depth() Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-24 3:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/17] selftests/bpf: Test recursion through a global function and a callback Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-24 3:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/17] bpf: Keep functions with address taken when removing dead code Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-24 3:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/17] bpf: Prepare static analysis passes for callx instruction Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-24 3:56 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-24 4:18 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-24 3:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/17] bpf: Add callx instruction to call bpf subprogs indirectly Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-24 3:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 3:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/17] bpf: Add callx calls to the call graph Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-24 3:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 3:56 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-24 5:00 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-24 3:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/17] bpf, x86: Add JIT support for callx Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-24 5:33 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-24 3:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/17] bpf, arm64: " Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-24 3:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/17] bpf: Discover subprogs described by func_info Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-24 5:42 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-24 3:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/17] bpf: Recognize pointers to functions in read-only maps Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-24 3:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/17] libbpf: Support pointers to static functions in data when linking Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-24 3:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 12/17] libbpf: Resolve pointers to functions in read-only data Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-24 3:27 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-24 3:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 13/17] libbpf: Treat .data.rel.ro as " Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-24 3:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 14/17] libbpf: Support pointers to functions in read-only data in light skeleton Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-24 3:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 15/17] selftests/bpf: Add tests for callx Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-24 3:56 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-24 3:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 16/17] selftests/bpf: Add tests for callx through pointers in read-only data Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-24 3:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 17/17] bpf, docs: Document callx instruction Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-24 5:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/17] bpf: Indirect calls of bpf subprogs (callx) patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-09-24 5:55 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-24 6:00 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-24 17:50 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-09-24 18:09 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-28 23:13 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-09-29 6:04 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-29 16:40 ` Ihor Solodrai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260924032759.3CE1A1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.