Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/17] bpf: Indirect calls of bpf subprogs (callx)

[Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>]

On 9/23/26 10:50 PM, patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org wrote:
> Hello:
> 
> This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
> by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

Hi Alexei.

Looks like this broke GCC BPF selftests build:

  progs/verifier_callx.c: In function 'apply_op':
    progs/verifier_callx.c:977:1: error: indirect call in function, which are not supported by eBPF
      977 | }
          | ^
      GCC-BPF  [test_progs-bpf_gcc] verifier_const.bpf.o
      GCC-BPF  [test_progs-bpf_gcc] verifier_const_or.bpf.o
      GCC-BPF  [test_progs-bpf_gcc] verifier_ctx.bpf.o
    At top level:
    cc1: note: unrecognized command-line option '-Wno-initializer-overrides' may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics
    cc1: note: unrecognized command-line option '-Wno-microsoft-anon-tag' may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics
    make[1]: *** [Makefile.skel:92: /codebuild/output/src4258392908/src/actions-runner/_work/bpf/bpf/src/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_gcc/verifier_callx.bpf.o] Error 1
    make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
    progs/verifier_callx_rodata.c: In function 'use_shape':
    progs/verifier_callx_rodata.c:746:1: error: indirect call in function, which are not supported by eBPF
      746 | }
          | ^
    progs/verifier_callx_rodata.c:746:1: error: indirect call in function, which are not supported by eBPF
    At top level:
    cc1: note: unrecognized command-line option '-Wno-initializer-overrides' may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics
    cc1: note: unrecognized command-line option '-Wno-microsoft-anon-tag' may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics
    make[1]: *** [Makefile.skel:91: /codebuild/output/src4258392908/src/actions-runner/_work/bpf/bpf/src/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_gcc/verifier_callx_rodata.bpf.o] Error 1

Could you please take a look?

https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/36028658230/job/107735139837

> 
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2026 03:10:25 +0000 you wrote:
>> [...]