* [PATCH vfs v2] bpf: Allow bpf_d_path() from filp_close_sync()
@ 2026-09-25 21:03 Ihor Solodrai
2026-09-25 21:17 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ihor Solodrai @ 2026-09-25 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Brauner, Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko,
Daniel Borkmann, Eduard Zingerman, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Cc: Alexander Viro, Jan Kara, NeilBrown, Jiri Olsa, Mark Brown,
linux-fsdevel, bpf, linux-kernel, kernel-team
The d_path selftest closes its descriptors with close_range() so that
its fentry program on filp_close() runs. The vfs commit
c1ed65ea167b ("fs: make close_range() synchronous") switched
close_range() to filp_close_sync(), so the program still attaches but
is never called:
test_d_path_basic:FAIL:close trampoline for filp_close was not called
With that series, close(), close_range() and the closes on exec and
exit all go through filp_close_sync(). Few paths still reach
filp_close(), dup2() being one of them, so a program on filp_close()
no longer sees most file closes.
Allow bpf_d_path() from filp_close_sync(), but only from fentry.
filp_close_sync() drops the last file reference inline, so by the time
an fexit program runs, file->f_path may already be freed, with no RCU
delay for NORCU dentries such as pipes and sockets.
Attach the selftest program to filp_close_sync() and keep triggering
it with close_range().
Add a test rejecting bpf_d_path() from fexit/filp_close_sync.
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
---
v1->v2:
* Allow bpf_d_path() from filp_close_sync() only for fentry (bpf-ci-bot)
* Add a verifier test rejecting bpf_d_path() from fexit/filp_close_sync
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260924204226.190315-1-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev/
The issue was found by BPF CI when running on linux-next:
https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/35923662147/job/107398237366
---
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 16 ++++++++++++--
.../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/d_path.c | 7 ++++---
.../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_d_path.c | 2 +-
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_d_path.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 29260951aa87..c3b869646bae 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -974,6 +974,10 @@ BTF_ID(func, vfs_getattr)
BTF_ID(func, filp_close)
BTF_SET_END(btf_allowlist_d_path)
+BTF_SET_START(btf_allowlist_d_path_fentry)
+BTF_ID(func, filp_close_sync)
+BTF_SET_END(btf_allowlist_d_path_fentry)
+
static bool bpf_d_path_allowed(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING &&
@@ -983,8 +987,16 @@ static bool bpf_d_path_allowed(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM)
return bpf_lsm_is_sleepable_hook(prog->aux->attach_btf_id);
- return btf_id_set_contains(&btf_allowlist_d_path,
- prog->aux->attach_btf_id);
+ if (btf_id_set_contains(&btf_allowlist_d_path,
+ prog->aux->attach_btf_id))
+ return true;
+
+ if (btf_id_set_contains(&btf_allowlist_d_path_fentry,
+ prog->aux->attach_btf_id))
+ return prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_FENTRY ||
+ prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_FENTRY_MULTI;
+
+ return false;
}
BTF_ID_LIST_SINGLE(bpf_d_path_btf_ids, struct, path)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/d_path.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/d_path.c
index 1a2a2f1abf03..7665e1d28a64 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/d_path.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/d_path.c
@@ -109,8 +109,9 @@ static int trigger_fstat_events(pid_t pid)
fstat(indicatorfd, &fileStat);
out_close:
- /* sys_close no longer triggers filp_close, but we can
- * call sys_close_range instead which still does
+ /*
+ * filp_close_sync() may be inlined into close(2), so use
+ * close_range(2), which calls it directly.
*/
syscall_close(pipefd[0]);
syscall_close(pipefd[1]);
@@ -165,7 +166,7 @@ static void test_d_path_basic(void)
if (CHECK(!bss->called_close,
"close",
- "trampoline for filp_close was not called\n"))
+ "trampoline for filp_close_sync was not called\n"))
goto cleanup;
for (int i = 0; i < MAX_FILES; i++) {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_d_path.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_d_path.c
index 561b2f861808..edb5494a47f7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_d_path.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_d_path.c
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(prog_stat, struct path *path, struct kstat *stat,
return 0;
}
-SEC("fentry/filp_close")
+SEC("fentry/filp_close_sync")
int BPF_PROG(prog_close, struct file *file, void *id)
{
pid_t pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_d_path.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_d_path.c
index 87e51a215558..7ab9b6b1d589 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_d_path.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_d_path.c
@@ -45,4 +45,25 @@ __naked void d_path_reject(void)
: __clobber_all);
}
+SEC("fexit/filp_close_sync")
+__description("d_path fexit reject")
+__failure __msg("helper call is not allowed in probe")
+__naked void d_path_fexit_reject(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 0); \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -8; \
+ r6 = 0; \
+ *(u64*)(r2 + 0) = r6; \
+ r3 = 8 ll; \
+ call %[bpf_d_path]; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+ "
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_d_path)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
base-commit: 6b97d8b942960f55e821df4f618438e3da125887
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH vfs v2] bpf: Allow bpf_d_path() from filp_close_sync()
2026-09-25 21:03 [PATCH vfs v2] bpf: Allow bpf_d_path() from filp_close_sync() Ihor Solodrai
@ 2026-09-25 21:17 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-09-25 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ihor Solodrai; +Cc: bpf
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] bpf: dead code in bpf_d_path_allowed for BPF_TRACE_FENTRY_MULTI
- [Low] bpf: build failure due to missing filp_close_sync BTF ID
- [Low] selftests/bpf: use of deprecated CHECK() macro when updating existing test
--
commit 83314c61560bbf42baf321997dbfd6e5b66818d7
Author: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
bpf: Allow bpf_d_path() from filp_close_sync()
This commit allows bpf_d_path() to be called from the filp_close_sync()
fentry program. It updates the allowlist and related selftests to reflect
the target function change introduced by recent VFS updates.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260924204226.190315-1-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev/
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> index 29260951aa871..c3b869646baeb 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> @@ -974,6 +974,10 @@ BTF_ID(func, vfs_getattr)
> BTF_ID(func, filp_close)
> BTF_SET_END(btf_allowlist_d_path)
>
> +BTF_SET_START(btf_allowlist_d_path_fentry)
> +BTF_ID(func, filp_close_sync)
[Severity: Low]
Is this function available in the current tree? The commit message mentions
VFS commit c1ed65ea167b, but without it being merged, resolve_btfids will
abort the kernel build because it cannot find the target function
filp_close_sync.
> +BTF_SET_END(btf_allowlist_d_path_fentry)
[ ... ]
> - return btf_id_set_contains(&btf_allowlist_d_path,
> - prog->aux->attach_btf_id);
> + if (btf_id_set_contains(&btf_allowlist_d_path,
> + prog->aux->attach_btf_id))
> + return true;
> +
> + if (btf_id_set_contains(&btf_allowlist_d_path_fentry,
> + prog->aux->attach_btf_id))
> + return prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_FENTRY ||
> + prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_FENTRY_MULTI;
[Severity: Low]
Could this check for BPF_TRACE_FENTRY_MULTI be unreachable? For multi-attach
programs, prog->aux->attach_btf_id is always initialized to a dummy ID
(bpf_multi_func_btf_id[0]) at program load time. Because this dummy ID is not
present in the btf_allowlist_d_path_fentry set, the btf_id_set_contains()
check evaluates to false before reaching the expected_attach_type condition.
> +
> + return false;
> }
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/d_path.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/d_path.c
> index 1a2a2f1abf033..7665e1d28a641 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/d_path.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/d_path.c
> @@ -165,7 +166,7 @@ static void test_d_path_basic(void)
>
> if (CHECK(!bss->called_close,
> "close",
> - "trampoline for filp_close was not called\n"))
> + "trampoline for filp_close_sync was not called\n"))
[Severity: Low]
Since this test is being updated, should this deprecated CHECK() macro be
migrated to a modern ASSERT_*() macro? The BPF subsystem selftest standards
mandate using modern assertion macros when updating existing tests.
> goto cleanup;
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_d_path.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_d_path.c
> index 561b2f861808e..edb5494a47f74 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_d_path.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_d_path.c
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(prog_stat, struct path *path, struct kstat *stat,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -SEC("fentry/filp_close")
> +SEC("fentry/filp_close_sync")
[Severity: Low]
Similar to the BTF ID issue above, will this test fail to load because
filp_close_sync does not exist in the current kernel tree?
> int BPF_PROG(prog_close, struct file *file, void *id)
> {
> pid_t pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260925210347.1364191-1-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-25 21:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-25 21:03 [PATCH vfs v2] bpf: Allow bpf_d_path() from filp_close_sync() Ihor Solodrai
2026-09-25 21:17 ` sashiko-bot
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.