* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] sched/cache: Keep nr_pref_llc_running in the runnable domain," failed to apply to 7.2-stable tree
@ 2026-09-29 11:43 gregkh
2026-09-29 22:12 ` Tim Chen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2026-09-29 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tim.c.chen, kayracizmeci, mingo, peterz, stable, yu.c.chen,
zhanxusheng
Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 7.2-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-7.2.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 0d6526f82c3cdefcca47f73f5fc08dc6f335eac6
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026092932-unmanaged-nectar-23d8@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 7.2.y' 'HEAD^..'
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 0d6526f82c3cdefcca47f73f5fc08dc6f335eac6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 17:37:22 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] sched/cache: Keep nr_pref_llc_running in the runnable domain,
to fix LLC mis-scheduling bug
alb_break_llc() decides whether to break LLC preference during active
load balance. It does so by testing that every runnable fair task on the
source rq prefers its LLC:
env->src_rq->nr_pref_llc_running == env->src_rq->cfs.h_nr_runnable
But the two counters cover different sets. nr_pref_llc_running is updated
in account_llc_enqueue()/account_llc_dequeue(), next to cfs_rq->nr_queued,
so it follows queued tasks. h_nr_runnable is updated in set_delayed()/
clear_delayed() and drops delay-dequeued tasks.
So under DELAY_DEQUEUE, a preferring task that goes to sleep stays counted
in nr_pref_llc_running while h_nr_runnable falls. The equality then breaks,
alb_break_llc() returns false, and active balance is free to pull a task
off its preferred LLC. Active balance only moves runnable tasks, and this
is the only LLC check it consults: once the stopper runs, LBF_ACTIVE_LB
skips the per-task test in can_migrate_task(). The runnable set is the one
we want.
Fix it on the counter side. A task should be counted in
nr_pref_llc_running exactly while it is both queued on its preferred LLC
(pref_llc_queued) and runnable (!sched_delayed). Define that membership
once in task_pref_llc_runnable(), and adjust the counter only through
pref_llc_running_inc()/pref_llc_running_dec() from the four sites that
change either input: account_llc_enqueue(), account_llc_dequeue(),
set_delayed() and clear_delayed(). Gating every update on the same
predicate keeps the delay, wake and dequeue paths from double-counting
or underflowing; see the comments at those sites for the ordering.
nr_llc_running and sd->llc_counts are not touched and stay on queued
semantics.
Fixes: 714059f79ff0 ("sched/cache: Handle moving single tasks to/from their preferred LLC")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260827135000.735138-1-zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com/
Reported-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
Suggested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kayra Cizmeci <kayracizmeci@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org> # v7.2.x
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/06af61afedac32e6477f57feb4d658f6c411c3af.1790035273.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 7455a83a6a99..de3d589fa8eb 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1546,6 +1546,28 @@ static bool invalid_llc_nr(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *p,
(scale * per_cpu(sd_llc_size, cpu)));
}
+/*
+ * A task counts in nr_pref_llc_running while it is queued on its preferred
+ * LLC (pref_llc_queued) and runnable (!sched_delayed), keeping the counter in
+ * the runnable domain so alb_break_llc() can compare it with h_nr_runnable.
+ */
+static bool task_pref_llc_runnable(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ return p->pref_llc_queued && !p->se.sched_delayed;
+}
+
+static void pref_llc_running_inc(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ if (task_pref_llc_runnable(p))
+ rq->nr_pref_llc_running++;
+}
+
+static void pref_llc_running_dec(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ if (task_pref_llc_runnable(p))
+ rq->nr_pref_llc_running--;
+}
+
static void account_llc_enqueue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
int pref_llc, pref_llc_queued;
@@ -1557,7 +1579,6 @@ static void account_llc_enqueue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
pref_llc_queued = (pref_llc == task_llc(p));
rq->nr_llc_running++;
- rq->nr_pref_llc_running += pref_llc_queued;
/*
* Record whether p is enqueued on its preferred
@@ -1575,6 +1596,9 @@ static void account_llc_enqueue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
*/
p->pref_llc_queued = pref_llc_queued;
+ /* Skipped while delayed; clear_delayed() adds it back on wake. */
+ pref_llc_running_inc(rq, p);
+
sd = rcu_dereference_all(rq->sd);
if (sd && (unsigned int)pref_llc < sd->llc_max)
sd->llc_counts[pref_llc]++;
@@ -1591,7 +1615,12 @@ static void account_llc_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
rq->nr_llc_running--;
if (p->pref_llc_queued) {
- rq->nr_pref_llc_running--;
+ /*
+ * Skipped if still delayed (set_delayed() already removed it);
+ * clearing pref_llc_queued below also stops clear_delayed()
+ * from re-adding it.
+ */
+ pref_llc_running_dec(rq, p);
/*
* Update the status in case
* other logic might query
@@ -1995,6 +2024,7 @@ void init_sched_mm(struct task_struct *p)
* polluting account_llc_enqueue().
*/
p->preferred_llc = -1;
+ p->pref_llc_queued = 0;
}
#else /* CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE */
@@ -2016,6 +2046,10 @@ static void account_llc_enqueue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) {}
static void account_llc_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) {}
+static void pref_llc_running_inc(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) {}
+
+static void pref_llc_running_dec(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) {}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE */
/*
@@ -6390,15 +6424,27 @@ static __always_inline void return_cfs_rq_runtime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
static void set_delayed(struct sched_entity *se)
{
- se->sched_delayed = 1;
-
/*
* Delayed se of cfs_rq have no tasks queued on them.
* Do not adjust h_nr_runnable since __dequeue_task()
* will account it for blocked tasks.
+ *
+ * This check can be removed because when flat pick
+ * patches get merged as only task can get delayed,
+ * same for clear_delayed().
*/
- if (!entity_is_task(se))
+ if (!entity_is_task(se)) {
+ se->sched_delayed = 1;
return;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Drop a task leaving the runnable set.
+ * Needs to be called before sched_delayed is set.
+ * clear_delayed() mirrors this after clearing the flag.
+ */
+ pref_llc_running_dec(rq_of(cfs_rq_of(se)), task_of(se));
+ se->sched_delayed = 1;
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
@@ -6420,6 +6466,13 @@ static void clear_delayed(struct sched_entity *se)
if (!entity_is_task(se))
return;
+ /*
+ * Re-add on wake, after sched_delayed is cleared. On a final delayed
+ * dequeue account_llc_dequeue() already cleared pref_llc_queued, so
+ * this does nothing.
+ */
+ pref_llc_running_inc(rq_of(cfs_rq_of(se)), task_of(se));
+
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] sched/cache: Keep nr_pref_llc_running in the runnable domain," failed to apply to 7.2-stable tree
2026-09-29 11:43 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] sched/cache: Keep nr_pref_llc_running in the runnable domain," failed to apply to 7.2-stable tree gregkh
@ 2026-09-29 22:12 ` Tim Chen
2026-09-30 12:09 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tim Chen @ 2026-09-29 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh, kayracizmeci, mingo, peterz, stable, yu.c.chen,
zhanxusheng; +Cc: stable
On Tue, 2026-09-29 at 13:43 +0200, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> The patch below does not apply to the 7.2-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
>
> To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
>
> git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-7.2.y
> git checkout FETCH_HEAD
> git cherry-pick -x 0d6526f82c3cdefcca47f73f5fc08dc6f335eac6
This patch seems to apply cleanly on latest 7.2.8:
commit 9a66fdc0d7fd55f54235524a73435af99051e46f (tag: v7.2.8, stable/linux-7.2.y)
[tim@b04f130c83f2 linux]$ git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-7.2.y
From https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux
* branch linux-7.2.y -> FETCH_HEAD
[tim@b04f130c83f2 linux]$ git checkout FETCH_HEAD
HEAD is now at 9a66fdc0d7fd5 Linux 7.2.8
[tim@b04f130c83f2 linux]$ git cherry-pick -x 0d6526f82c3cdefcca47f73f5fc08dc6f335eac6
Auto-merging kernel/sched/fair.c
[detached HEAD 9d0e82dcbce41] sched/cache: Keep nr_pref_llc_running in the runnable domain, to fix LLC mis-scheduling bug
Date: Mon Sep 21 17:37:22 2026 -0700
1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Thanks.
Tim
> # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
> git commit -s
> git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026092932-unmanaged-nectar-23d8@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 7.2.y' 'HEAD^..'
>
> Possible dependencies:
>
>
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>
> From 0d6526f82c3cdefcca47f73f5fc08dc6f335eac6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 17:37:22 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] sched/cache: Keep nr_pref_llc_running in the runnable domain,
> to fix LLC mis-scheduling bug
>
> alb_break_llc() decides whether to break LLC preference during active
> load balance. It does so by testing that every runnable fair task on the
> source rq prefers its LLC:
>
> env->src_rq->nr_pref_llc_running == env->src_rq->cfs.h_nr_runnable
>
> But the two counters cover different sets. nr_pref_llc_running is updated
> in account_llc_enqueue()/account_llc_dequeue(), next to cfs_rq->nr_queued,
> so it follows queued tasks. h_nr_runnable is updated in set_delayed()/
> clear_delayed() and drops delay-dequeued tasks.
>
> So under DELAY_DEQUEUE, a preferring task that goes to sleep stays counted
> in nr_pref_llc_running while h_nr_runnable falls. The equality then breaks,
> alb_break_llc() returns false, and active balance is free to pull a task
> off its preferred LLC. Active balance only moves runnable tasks, and this
> is the only LLC check it consults: once the stopper runs, LBF_ACTIVE_LB
> skips the per-task test in can_migrate_task(). The runnable set is the one
> we want.
>
> Fix it on the counter side. A task should be counted in
> nr_pref_llc_running exactly while it is both queued on its preferred LLC
> (pref_llc_queued) and runnable (!sched_delayed). Define that membership
> once in task_pref_llc_runnable(), and adjust the counter only through
> pref_llc_running_inc()/pref_llc_running_dec() from the four sites that
> change either input: account_llc_enqueue(), account_llc_dequeue(),
> set_delayed() and clear_delayed(). Gating every update on the same
> predicate keeps the delay, wake and dequeue paths from double-counting
> or underflowing; see the comments at those sites for the ordering.
>
> nr_llc_running and sd->llc_counts are not touched and stay on queued
> semantics.
>
> Fixes: 714059f79ff0 ("sched/cache: Handle moving single tasks to/from their preferred LLC")
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260827135000.735138-1-zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com/
> Reported-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
> Suggested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Kayra Cizmeci <kayracizmeci@gmail.com>
> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> # v7.2.x
> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/06af61afedac32e6477f57feb4d658f6c411c3af.1790035273.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 7455a83a6a99..de3d589fa8eb 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -1546,6 +1546,28 @@ static bool invalid_llc_nr(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *p,
> (scale * per_cpu(sd_llc_size, cpu)));
> }
>
> +/*
> + * A task counts in nr_pref_llc_running while it is queued on its preferred
> + * LLC (pref_llc_queued) and runnable (!sched_delayed), keeping the counter in
> + * the runnable domain so alb_break_llc() can compare it with h_nr_runnable.
> + */
> +static bool task_pref_llc_runnable(struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> + return p->pref_llc_queued && !p->se.sched_delayed;
> +}
> +
> +static void pref_llc_running_inc(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> + if (task_pref_llc_runnable(p))
> + rq->nr_pref_llc_running++;
> +}
> +
> +static void pref_llc_running_dec(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> + if (task_pref_llc_runnable(p))
> + rq->nr_pref_llc_running--;
> +}
> +
> static void account_llc_enqueue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> {
> int pref_llc, pref_llc_queued;
> @@ -1557,7 +1579,6 @@ static void account_llc_enqueue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>
> pref_llc_queued = (pref_llc == task_llc(p));
> rq->nr_llc_running++;
> - rq->nr_pref_llc_running += pref_llc_queued;
>
> /*
> * Record whether p is enqueued on its preferred
> @@ -1575,6 +1596,9 @@ static void account_llc_enqueue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> */
> p->pref_llc_queued = pref_llc_queued;
>
> + /* Skipped while delayed; clear_delayed() adds it back on wake. */
> + pref_llc_running_inc(rq, p);
> +
> sd = rcu_dereference_all(rq->sd);
> if (sd && (unsigned int)pref_llc < sd->llc_max)
> sd->llc_counts[pref_llc]++;
> @@ -1591,7 +1615,12 @@ static void account_llc_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>
> rq->nr_llc_running--;
> if (p->pref_llc_queued) {
> - rq->nr_pref_llc_running--;
> + /*
> + * Skipped if still delayed (set_delayed() already removed it);
> + * clearing pref_llc_queued below also stops clear_delayed()
> + * from re-adding it.
> + */
> + pref_llc_running_dec(rq, p);
> /*
> * Update the status in case
> * other logic might query
> @@ -1995,6 +2024,7 @@ void init_sched_mm(struct task_struct *p)
> * polluting account_llc_enqueue().
> */
> p->preferred_llc = -1;
> + p->pref_llc_queued = 0;
> }
>
> #else /* CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE */
> @@ -2016,6 +2046,10 @@ static void account_llc_enqueue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) {}
>
> static void account_llc_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) {}
>
> +static void pref_llc_running_inc(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) {}
> +
> +static void pref_llc_running_dec(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) {}
> +
> #endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE */
>
> /*
> @@ -6390,15 +6424,27 @@ static __always_inline void return_cfs_rq_runtime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
>
> static void set_delayed(struct sched_entity *se)
> {
> - se->sched_delayed = 1;
> -
> /*
> * Delayed se of cfs_rq have no tasks queued on them.
> * Do not adjust h_nr_runnable since __dequeue_task()
> * will account it for blocked tasks.
> + *
> + * This check can be removed because when flat pick
> + * patches get merged as only task can get delayed,
> + * same for clear_delayed().
> */
> - if (!entity_is_task(se))
> + if (!entity_is_task(se)) {
> + se->sched_delayed = 1;
> return;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Drop a task leaving the runnable set.
> + * Needs to be called before sched_delayed is set.
> + * clear_delayed() mirrors this after clearing the flag.
> + */
> + pref_llc_running_dec(rq_of(cfs_rq_of(se)), task_of(se));
> + se->sched_delayed = 1;
>
> for_each_sched_entity(se) {
> struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> @@ -6420,6 +6466,13 @@ static void clear_delayed(struct sched_entity *se)
> if (!entity_is_task(se))
> return;
>
> + /*
> + * Re-add on wake, after sched_delayed is cleared. On a final delayed
> + * dequeue account_llc_dequeue() already cleared pref_llc_queued, so
> + * this does nothing.
> + */
> + pref_llc_running_inc(rq_of(cfs_rq_of(se)), task_of(se));
> +
> for_each_sched_entity(se) {
> struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] sched/cache: Keep nr_pref_llc_running in the runnable domain," failed to apply to 7.2-stable tree
2026-09-29 22:12 ` Tim Chen
@ 2026-09-30 12:09 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2026-09-30 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tim Chen
Cc: kayracizmeci, mingo, peterz, stable, yu.c.chen, zhanxusheng,
stable
On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 03:12:01PM -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
> On Tue, 2026-09-29 at 13:43 +0200, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> > The patch below does not apply to the 7.2-stable tree.
> > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> > id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
> >
> > To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
> >
> > git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-7.2.y
> > git checkout FETCH_HEAD
> > git cherry-pick -x 0d6526f82c3cdefcca47f73f5fc08dc6f335eac6
>
> This patch seems to apply cleanly on latest 7.2.8:
> commit 9a66fdc0d7fd55f54235524a73435af99051e46f (tag: v7.2.8, stable/linux-7.2.y)
>
> [tim@b04f130c83f2 linux]$ git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-7.2.y
> >From https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux
> * branch linux-7.2.y -> FETCH_HEAD
> [tim@b04f130c83f2 linux]$ git checkout FETCH_HEAD
> HEAD is now at 9a66fdc0d7fd5 Linux 7.2.8
> [tim@b04f130c83f2 linux]$ git cherry-pick -x 0d6526f82c3cdefcca47f73f5fc08dc6f335eac6
> Auto-merging kernel/sched/fair.c
> [detached HEAD 9d0e82dcbce41] sched/cache: Keep nr_pref_llc_running in the runnable domain, to fix LLC mis-scheduling bug
> Date: Mon Sep 21 17:37:22 2026 -0700
> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
Does not apply now, perhaps due to other patches in the queue?
Again, can you send a series?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-30 12:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-29 11:43 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] sched/cache: Keep nr_pref_llc_running in the runnable domain," failed to apply to 7.2-stable tree gregkh
2026-09-29 22:12 ` Tim Chen
2026-09-30 12:09 ` Greg KH
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.