All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Fuad Tabba" <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
	"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/18] KVM: arm64: Skip fixed-feature state flush for protected vCPUs
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2026 14:19:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261001141928.87F621F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001135711.1640520-7-fuad.tabba@linux.dev>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] kvm: arm64: host hardware breakpoints leak into protected guests
--

commit 678dfb9fd1576272693dba360820510bcb1ec938
Author: Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>

    KVM: arm64: Skip fixed-feature state flush for protected vCPUs

This commit moves the mdcr_el2 and TWI/TWE copies into the non-protected
branch. It returns early from flush_debug_state() and sync_debug_state() for
protected vCPUs, as their debug registers are hypervisor-owned, and
configures HPMN at vCPU load.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> index e3f4bbb623492..b7b9f5afb673b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> @@ -200,6 +200,9 @@ static void flush_debug_state(struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *hyp_vcpu)
>  {
>  	struct kvm_vcpu *host_vcpu = hyp_vcpu->host_vcpu;
>  
> +	if (pkvm_hyp_vcpu_is_protected(hyp_vcpu))
> +		return;
> +

[Severity: High]
Could this early return cause a regression by allowing the host's hardware
breakpoints to leak into the protected guest?

By returning early here, the hyp vCPU's debug_owner remains VCPU_DEBUG_FREE (0)
for protected VMs.

During the world switch, this causes the hypervisor to skip context-switching
the hardware debug registers because kvm_debug_regs_in_use() evaluates to false:

arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/debug-sr.h:__debug_switch_to_guest_common() {
    ...
	if (!kvm_debug_regs_in_use(vcpu))
		return;
    ...
}

As a result, the host's physical breakpoints remain active in hardware.

If the guest implements DebugVer, MDCR_EL2.TDA is not set:

arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c:pvm_init_traps_mdcr() {
    ...
	if (!kvm_has_feat(kvm, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, DebugVer, IMP))
		val |= MDCR_EL2_TDRA | MDCR_EL2_TDA;
    ...
}

This gives the guest untrapped access to MDSCR_EL1. If the guest sets
MDSCR_EL1.MDE=1, the host's hardware breakpoints could fire inside the guest
at EL1, circumventing guest isolation.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261001135711.1640520-1-fuad.tabba@linux.dev?part=6

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-01 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-01 13:56 [PATCH v4 00/18] KVM: arm64: Confine protected VM vCPU state to EL2 Fuad Tabba
2026-10-01 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 01/18] KVM: arm64: Sync HCR_EL2.VSE back to the host vCPU under pKVM Fuad Tabba
2026-10-01 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 02/18] KVM: arm64: Validate the host vCPU's VM before reading it " Fuad Tabba
2026-10-01 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 03/18] KVM: arm64: Pin the host vCPU before adjusting its PC " Fuad Tabba
2026-10-01 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 04/18] KVM: arm64: Disable steal time for protected VMs Fuad Tabba
2026-10-01 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 05/18] KVM: arm64: Introduce per-EC entry handlers for pKVM Fuad Tabba
2026-10-01 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 06/18] KVM: arm64: Skip fixed-feature state flush for protected vCPUs Fuad Tabba
2026-10-01 14:19   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-01 15:06     ` Fuad Tabba
2026-10-01 13:57 ` [PATCH v4 07/18] KVM: arm64: Add {flush,sync}_hyp_timer_state() primitives Fuad Tabba
2026-10-01 13:57 ` [PATCH v4 08/18] KVM: arm64: Add system register reset framework for protected VMs Fuad Tabba
2026-10-01 13:57 ` [PATCH v4 09/18] KVM: arm64: Implement HVC handling for protected guests at EL2 Fuad Tabba
2026-10-01 13:57 ` [PATCH v4 10/18] KVM: arm64: Handle PSCI calls for protected VMs " Fuad Tabba
2026-10-01 13:57 ` [PATCH v4 11/18] KVM: arm64: Restrict KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT and PSCI version for protected VMs Fuad Tabba
2026-10-01 13:57 ` [PATCH v4 12/18] KVM: arm64: Prevent host PC adjustments for protected vCPUs Fuad Tabba
2026-10-01 14:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 15:08     ` Fuad Tabba
2026-10-01 13:57 ` [PATCH v4 13/18] KVM: arm64: Inject an UNDEF at EL2 for unhandled protected guest exits Fuad Tabba
2026-10-01 13:57 ` [PATCH v4 14/18] KVM: arm64: Add per-EC entry/exit state marshalling for protected guests Fuad Tabba
2026-10-01 13:57 ` [PATCH v4 15/18] KVM: arm64: Reject host access to protected VM private state Fuad Tabba
2026-10-01 13:57 ` [PATCH v4 16/18] KVM: arm64: Reject host power-on of a vCPU that EL2 holds powered off Fuad Tabba
2026-10-01 14:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 15:10     ` Fuad Tabba
2026-10-01 13:57 ` [PATCH v4 17/18] KVM: arm64: Advertise the capabilities that protected VMs support Fuad Tabba
2026-10-01 13:57 ` [PATCH v4 18/18] KVM: arm64: Document the protected VM userspace API Fuad Tabba
2026-10-01 14:31 ` [PATCH v4 00/18] KVM: arm64: Confine protected VM vCPU state to EL2 Fuad Tabba
2026-10-02 15:55 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-10-03  6:57   ` Fuad Tabba
2026-10-03  8:38     ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261001141928.87F621F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.