All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/9] perf mutex: Add DEFINE_MUTEX() static initializer
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2026 10:26:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261004102636.4FC701F0089A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261004102133.26392-4-acme@kernel.org>

> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> 
> For file scope mutexes, so that they don't need a constructor function
> to initialize them at startup, mirroring PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER
> while keeping the clang -Wthread-safety annotations of struct mutex.
> 
> DEBUG=1 builds have mutex_init() set PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK, making
> the CHECK_ERR() paths in mutex_lock()/mutex_unlock() report relocking a
> held mutex and unlocking one that isn't held.  PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER
> gives a default type mutex, so statically initialized ones would silently
> lose that: use PTHREAD_ERRORCHECK_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_NP, a glibc
> extension, falling back to the default type in libcs that lack it.
> 
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261004102133.26392-1-acme@kernel.org?part=3


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-04 10:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-04 10:21 [PATCH v10 0/9] perf tools: Add progress diagnostics and a false-sharing workload Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-04 10:21 ` [PATCH v10 1/9] perf config: Move perf_config__set_variable() to util/config.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-04 10:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 10:21 ` [PATCH v10 2/9] perf config: Make perf_etc_perfconfig() never return NULL Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-04 10:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 10:21 ` [PATCH v10 3/9] perf mutex: Add DEFINE_MUTEX() static initializer Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-04 10:26   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-04 10:21 ` [PATCH v10 4/9] perf mutex: Add DO_ONCE() for one-time initialization Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-04 10:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 10:21 ` [PATCH v10 5/9] perf config: Serialize config file access with a mutex Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-04 10:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 10:21 ` [PATCH v10 6/9] perf report: Add --progress option Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-04 10:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 10:21 ` [PATCH v10 7/9] perf report: Add --no-progress option Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-04 10:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 10:21 ` [PATCH v10 8/9] perf scripts: Add perf-stuck, to tell where a running perf is stuck Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-04 10:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 10:21 ` [PATCH v10 9/9] perf test: Add false_sharing workload exhibiting cross-CPU false sharing Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-04 10:27   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261004102636.4FC701F0089A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.