* [PATCH v2] perf/arm_cspmu: Add Arm system PMU
@ 2026-10-05 13:42 Robin Murphy
2026-10-05 13:56 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Robin Murphy @ 2026-10-05 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: will; +Cc: mark.rutland, linux-perf-users, linux-arm-kernel
Arm's latest Compute Subsystems and SoCs are using a common PMU block
in various places which can mostly just be driven as a generic 64-bit
CoreSight PMU, but does have an IMP-DEF register for additional
filtering. The details of event and filter encodings depend on the
particular PMU instance, so are left to the higher level Arm Telemetry
Solution tooling.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
---
v2: Rebase onto for-next/perf
drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig | 7 +++
drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 7 +++
drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h | 1 +
drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_syspmu.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 83 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_syspmu.c
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig
index 6f4e28fc84a2..25bd55f036a4 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig
@@ -27,3 +27,10 @@ config AMPERE_CORESIGHT_PMU_ARCH_SYSTEM_PMU
In the first phase, the driver enables support on MCU PMU used in
AmpereOne SoC family.
+
+config ARM_SYSTEM_PMU
+ tristate "Arm System PMU"
+ depends on ARM_CORESIGHT_PMU_ARCH_SYSTEM_PMU
+ help
+ Support additional event filtering attributes for the CoreSight-based
+ PMU blocks found in various parts of Arm Compute Subsystems and SoCs.
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Makefile b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Makefile
index 220a734efd54..90c3cd710157 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Makefile
@@ -8,3 +8,4 @@ arm_cspmu_module-y := arm_cspmu.o
obj-$(CONFIG_NVIDIA_CORESIGHT_PMU_ARCH_SYSTEM_PMU) += nvidia_cspmu.o
obj-$(CONFIG_AMPERE_CORESIGHT_PMU_ARCH_SYSTEM_PMU) += ampere_cspmu.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SYSTEM_PMU) += arm_syspmu.o
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
index 912f03ce3ef5..9f298ea1a974 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
@@ -358,6 +358,13 @@ static struct arm_cspmu_impl_match impl_match[] = {
.module = NULL,
.impl_init_ops = NULL,
},
+ {
+ .module_name = "arm_syspmu",
+ .pmiidr_val = ARM_CSPMU_IMPL_ID_ARM,
+ .pmiidr_mask = PMIIDR_IMPLEMENTER,
+ .module = NULL,
+ .impl_init_ops = NULL,
+ },
{
.module_name = "ampere_cspmu",
.pmiidr_val = ARM_CSPMU_IMPL_ID_AMPERE,
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
index c4058d602477..03e34692a965 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
@@ -149,6 +149,7 @@
/* JEDEC-assigned JEP106 identification code */
#define ARM_CSPMU_IMPL_ID_NVIDIA 0x36B
+#define ARM_CSPMU_IMPL_ID_ARM 0x43B
#define ARM_CSPMU_IMPL_ID_AMPERE 0xA16
/* PMDEVARCH */
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_syspmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_syspmu.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ac234768a2f8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_syspmu.c
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+
+#include "arm_cspmu.h"
+
+#define PMEVFILT3R 0x200
+
+static struct attribute *arm_syspmu_format_attrs[] = {
+ ARM_CSPMU_FORMAT_EVENT_ATTR,
+ ARM_CSPMU_FORMAT_FILTER_ATTR,
+ ARM_CSPMU_FORMAT_FILTER2_ATTR,
+ ARM_CSPMU_FORMAT_ATTR(filter3, "config3:0-63"),
+ NULL,
+};
+
+static struct attribute **arm_syspmu_get_format_attrs(const struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
+{
+ return devm_kmemdup(cspmu->dev, arm_syspmu_format_attrs,
+ sizeof(arm_syspmu_format_attrs), GFP_KERNEL);
+}
+
+static void arm_syspmu_set_ev_filter(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
+ const struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ u32 offset = 8 * event->hw.idx;
+
+ writeq(event->attr.config1, cspmu->base0 + PMEVFILTR + offset);
+ writeq(event->attr.config2, cspmu->base0 + PMEVFILT2R + offset);
+ writeq(event->attr.config3, cspmu->base0 + PMEVFILT3R + offset);
+}
+
+static int arm_syspmu_init_ops(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
+{
+ switch (FIELD_GET(PMIIDR_PRODUCTID, cspmu->impl.pmiidr)) {
+ case 0x9c3:
+ cspmu->impl.ops.set_ev_filter = arm_syspmu_set_ev_filter;
+ cspmu->impl.ops.get_format_attrs = arm_syspmu_get_format_attrs;
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct arm_cspmu_impl_match arm_syspmu_param = {
+ .pmiidr_val = ARM_CSPMU_IMPL_ID_ARM,
+ .module = THIS_MODULE,
+ .impl_init_ops = arm_syspmu_init_ops
+};
+
+static int __init arm_syspmu_init(void)
+{
+ return arm_cspmu_impl_register(&arm_syspmu_param);
+}
+
+static void __exit arm_syspmu_exit(void)
+{
+ arm_cspmu_impl_unregister(&arm_syspmu_param);
+}
+
+module_init(arm_syspmu_init);
+module_exit(arm_syspmu_exit);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Arm System PMU Driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
--
2.54.0.dirty
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] perf/arm_cspmu: Add Arm system PMU
2026-10-05 13:42 [PATCH v2] perf/arm_cspmu: Add Arm system PMU Robin Murphy
@ 2026-10-05 13:56 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-10-05 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robin Murphy; +Cc: linux-perf-users
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] arm_syspmu: build failure on 32-bit archs due to missing writeq fallback
--
commit ee9850d17fe1852cb671454c79f2ae56292d6550
Author: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
perf/arm_cspmu: Add Arm system PMU
Arm's latest Compute Subsystems and SoCs are using a common PMU block
in various places which can mostly just be driven as a generic 64-bit
CoreSight PMU, but does have an IMP-DEF register for additional
filtering. The details of event and filter encodings depend on the
particular PMU instance, so are left to the higher level Arm Telemetry
Solution tooling.
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_syspmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_syspmu.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..ac234768a2f80
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_syspmu.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
[ ... ]
> +static void arm_syspmu_set_ev_filter(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
> + const struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> + u32 offset = 8 * event->hw.idx;
> +
> + writeq(event->attr.config1, cspmu->base0 + PMEVFILTR + offset);
> + writeq(event->attr.config2, cspmu->base0 + PMEVFILT2R + offset);
> + writeq(event->attr.config3, cspmu->base0 + PMEVFILT3R + offset);
[Severity: Low]
Will this driver fail to build on 32-bit architectures?
When compiling with CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST=y on a 32-bit platform like i386 or
ARM32, writeq() is not natively defined.
Could we include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h> to ensure the driver
compiles successfully by providing a writeq() fallback for 32-bit builds?
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/162173d376d223941b0c8b4e4a1c9ad2ae5c11a3.1791207773.git.robin.murphy@arm.com?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-05 13:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-05 13:42 [PATCH v2] perf/arm_cspmu: Add Arm system PMU Robin Murphy
2026-10-05 13:56 ` sashiko-bot
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.