From: Kayra Cizmeci <kayracizmeci@gmail.com>
To: tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com
Cc: KPrateek.Nayak@amd.com, Vishal.Badole@amd.com,
juri.lelli@redhat.com, kayracizmeci@gmail.com,
klaus.kusche@computerix.info, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mario.limonciello@amd.com, mingo@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
ricardo.neri@intel.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, x86@kernel.org, yu.c.chen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/cache: Honor asym packing over cache aware scheduling on hybrid systems
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 16:59:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261006135959.5709-1-kayracizmeci@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <77ceef1e51b895760dc5f6c9cde985a1679545b5.1791224900.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Hi Tim,
> + /*
> + * On asym packing domains, if the destination CPU
> + * has higher priority than all CPUs in the source group,
> + * prioritize asym packing.
> + */
> + if ((env->sd->flags & SD_ASYM_PACKING) &&
> + sgs->group_asym_packing)
> + return false;
> +
I think that check is redundant. group_asym_packing is set by sched_group_asym() and bunch of other stuff,
but sched_group_asym() calls sched_asym() and sched_asym() calls sched_use_asym_prio() that has SD_ASYM_PACKING check
inside of it.
Ah.. Hope I'm not missing something...
Reviewed-by: Kayra Cizmeci <kayracizmeci@gmail.com>
Now, I'm going to grab a cup of tea. And sleep.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-06 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-05 18:29 [PATCH v2] sched/cache: Honor asym packing over cache aware scheduling on hybrid systems Tim Chen
2026-10-06 13:59 ` Kayra Cizmeci [this message]
2026-10-06 17:04 ` Tim Chen
2026-10-06 15:30 ` Chen Yu
2026-10-06 17:27 ` Tim Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261006135959.5709-1-kayracizmeci@gmail.com \
--to=kayracizmeci@gmail.com \
--cc=KPrateek.Nayak@amd.com \
--cc=Vishal.Badole@amd.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=klaus.kusche@computerix.info \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ricardo.neri@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.