All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chen Pei <cp0613@linux.alibaba.com>
To: acme@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	namhyung@kernel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	jolsa@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	james.clark@linaro.org, leo.yan@linux.dev,
	john.g.garry@oracle.com, will@kernel.org, mike.leach@arm.com,
	pjw@kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com, guoren@kernel.org,
	anup@brainfault.org, david.laight.linux@gmail.com,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] perf riscv: Implement rdtsc()
Date: Fri,  9 Oct 2026 11:27:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261009032715.2841-1-cp0613@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)

tools/perf falls back to the __weak rdtsc() stub in tools/perf/util/tsc.c
on every architecture that does not override it, riscv included.  The
stub returns a constant 0, so anything that reaches for the counter gets
a value that means nothing and cannot tell it apart from a counter that
happens to be at 0.

The time CSR is a natural TSC equivalent on riscv: readable from user
mode, constant frequency, and the same counter that riscv's
arch_perf_update_userpage() feeds the user page conversion fields from,
ever since commit 83c5e13b8cbb ("riscv: Prepare for user-space perf
event mmap support").  This series registers that on the tools side.

The two patches are split so that the first stands on its own:

1. Implement rdtsc() over the time CSR for riscv64.

2. Have the build system say which architectures have a usable counter,
   instead of a list of compiler macros inside the test.

What this is worth beyond the subtest result:

1. The subtest is the only reader of those conversion fields riscv
   can run, so it guards arithmetic that has shipped unexercised;
   registering the counter at the same time leaves a future riscv
   auxtrace driver the reading and the conversion already in place.

2. The flag lets a caller ask whether the architecture has a counter
   before it uses the value, without keeping its own copy of a list
   that has to be edited every time an architecture grows an
   implementation.

Changes since v2:
- Key off IS_BUILTIN(HAVE_RDTSC), with <tools/config.h> included, instead
  of an #ifndef block, as Adrian Hunter suggested.
- Collected the tags received on v2.

Changes since v1:
- Define rdtsc() for RV64 only. RV32 now keeps the weak stub.
- Declare the capability through the build system rather than through a
  weak arch__rdtsc_supported() hook, following the PERF_HAVE_JITDUMP
  pattern, as Leo Yan suggested.

Tests:
======
- Build side, this version: the compile command of
  tests/perf-time-to-tsc.o carries -DHAVE_RDTSC on riscv64, arm64 and the
  x86_64 host, and does not on riscv32, so RV32 stays on the weak stub.
- Same object built on the host with and without the flag: with it the
  "TSC support" subtest returns TEST_OK with the skip branch folded out,
  without it the pr_debug and the TEST_SKIP branch are still there.  That
  is the branch the #ifndef used to pick, so the change is behaviour
  preserving.
- riscv64 QEMU virt guest with sscofpmf, as reported on v2: before the
  series the "TSC support" subtest skips and the conversion subtest fails
  while comparing against the stub's constant 0; after, both report Ok.
  Patch 1 is unchanged here and the subtest decision is behaviour
  preserving, so v3 was verified on the build side only.

Chen Pei (2):
  perf riscv: Implement rdtsc()
  perf tsc: Declare TSC support from the build system

 tools/perf/Makefile.config          |  4 ++++
 tools/perf/arch/arm64/Makefile      |  1 +
 tools/perf/arch/riscv/Makefile      |  1 +
 tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/Build    |  1 +
 tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/tsc.c    | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/perf/arch/x86/Makefile        |  1 +
 tools/perf/tests/perf-time-to-tsc.c | 14 ++------------
 7 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/tsc.c

-- 
2.50.1



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chen Pei <cp0613@linux.alibaba.com>
To: acme@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	namhyung@kernel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	jolsa@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	james.clark@linaro.org, leo.yan@linux.dev,
	john.g.garry@oracle.com, will@kernel.org, mike.leach@arm.com,
	pjw@kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com, guoren@kernel.org,
	anup@brainfault.org, david.laight.linux@gmail.com,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] perf riscv: Implement rdtsc()
Date: Fri,  9 Oct 2026 11:27:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261009032715.2841-1-cp0613@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)

tools/perf falls back to the __weak rdtsc() stub in tools/perf/util/tsc.c
on every architecture that does not override it, riscv included.  The
stub returns a constant 0, so anything that reaches for the counter gets
a value that means nothing and cannot tell it apart from a counter that
happens to be at 0.

The time CSR is a natural TSC equivalent on riscv: readable from user
mode, constant frequency, and the same counter that riscv's
arch_perf_update_userpage() feeds the user page conversion fields from,
ever since commit 83c5e13b8cbb ("riscv: Prepare for user-space perf
event mmap support").  This series registers that on the tools side.

The two patches are split so that the first stands on its own:

1. Implement rdtsc() over the time CSR for riscv64.

2. Have the build system say which architectures have a usable counter,
   instead of a list of compiler macros inside the test.

What this is worth beyond the subtest result:

1. The subtest is the only reader of those conversion fields riscv
   can run, so it guards arithmetic that has shipped unexercised;
   registering the counter at the same time leaves a future riscv
   auxtrace driver the reading and the conversion already in place.

2. The flag lets a caller ask whether the architecture has a counter
   before it uses the value, without keeping its own copy of a list
   that has to be edited every time an architecture grows an
   implementation.

Changes since v2:
- Key off IS_BUILTIN(HAVE_RDTSC), with <tools/config.h> included, instead
  of an #ifndef block, as Adrian Hunter suggested.
- Collected the tags received on v2.

Changes since v1:
- Define rdtsc() for RV64 only. RV32 now keeps the weak stub.
- Declare the capability through the build system rather than through a
  weak arch__rdtsc_supported() hook, following the PERF_HAVE_JITDUMP
  pattern, as Leo Yan suggested.

Tests:
======
- Build side, this version: the compile command of
  tests/perf-time-to-tsc.o carries -DHAVE_RDTSC on riscv64, arm64 and the
  x86_64 host, and does not on riscv32, so RV32 stays on the weak stub.
- Same object built on the host with and without the flag: with it the
  "TSC support" subtest returns TEST_OK with the skip branch folded out,
  without it the pr_debug and the TEST_SKIP branch are still there.  That
  is the branch the #ifndef used to pick, so the change is behaviour
  preserving.
- riscv64 QEMU virt guest with sscofpmf, as reported on v2: before the
  series the "TSC support" subtest skips and the conversion subtest fails
  while comparing against the stub's constant 0; after, both report Ok.
  Patch 1 is unchanged here and the subtest decision is behaviour
  preserving, so v3 was verified on the build side only.

Chen Pei (2):
  perf riscv: Implement rdtsc()
  perf tsc: Declare TSC support from the build system

 tools/perf/Makefile.config          |  4 ++++
 tools/perf/arch/arm64/Makefile      |  1 +
 tools/perf/arch/riscv/Makefile      |  1 +
 tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/Build    |  1 +
 tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/tsc.c    | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/perf/arch/x86/Makefile        |  1 +
 tools/perf/tests/perf-time-to-tsc.c | 14 ++------------
 7 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/tsc.c

-- 
2.50.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

             reply	other threads:[~2026-10-09  3:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-09  3:27 Chen Pei [this message]
2026-10-09  3:27 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] perf riscv: Implement rdtsc() Chen Pei
2026-10-09  3:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Chen Pei
2026-10-09  3:27   ` Chen Pei
2026-10-09  3:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09  3:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] perf tsc: Declare TSC support from the build system Chen Pei
2026-10-09  3:27   ` Chen Pei
2026-10-09  3:42   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261009032715.2841-1-cp0613@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=cp0613@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=leo.yan@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mike.leach@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjw@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.