From: Chen Pei <cp0613@linux.alibaba.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
memxor@gmail.com, bjorn@kernel.org, puranjay@kernel.org
Cc: eddyz87@gmail.com, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, jolsa@kernel.org, emil@etsalapatis.com,
ihor.solodrai@linux.dev, pulehui@huawei.com, pjw@kernel.org,
palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr,
luke.r.nels@gmail.com, xi.wang@gmail.com, shuah@kernel.org,
rgbi3307@gmail.com, guoren@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] selftests/bpf: Enable private stack tests for riscv64
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:12:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261015021238.5657-3-cp0613@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015021238.5657-1-cp0613@linux.alibaba.com>
The RV64 JIT now supports the private stack. Allow the existing
verifier and struct_ops private-stack tests to run on riscv64 and add
the expected RV64 JITed instruction patterns.
Signed-off-by: Chen Pei <cp0613@linux.alibaba.com>
---
.../bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_private_stack.c | 3 +-
.../bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_private_stack.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_private_stack.c
index 2b3ec2b79091..103179ff8733 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_private_stack.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_private_stack.c
@@ -6,7 +6,8 @@
#include "struct_ops_private_stack_recur.skel.h"
#include "struct_ops_private_stack_large.skel.h"
-#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__aarch64__) || defined(__powerpc64__)
+#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__aarch64__) || defined(__powerpc64__) || \
+ (defined(__riscv) && __riscv_xlen == 64)
static void test_private_stack(void)
{
struct struct_ops_private_stack *skel;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c
index 3d9994a52464..d9cebbc7355d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c
@@ -8,7 +8,8 @@
/* From include/linux/filter.h */
#define MAX_BPF_STACK 512
-#if defined(__TARGET_ARCH_x86) || defined(__TARGET_ARCH_arm64)
+#if defined(__TARGET_ARCH_x86) || defined(__TARGET_ARCH_arm64) || \
+ (defined(__TARGET_ARCH_riscv) && __riscv_xlen == 64)
struct elem {
struct bpf_timer t;
@@ -42,6 +43,14 @@ __jited(" mov x0, #0x2a")
__jited(" str x0, [x27]")
__jited("...")
__jited(" ldp x25, x27, [sp], {{.*}}")
+__arch_riscv64
+__jited(" addi sp, sp, -0x20")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" sd s5, 0x10(sp)")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" sd a0, -0x100(s5)")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" ld s5, 0x10(sp)")
__naked void private_stack_single_prog(void)
{
asm volatile (" \
@@ -60,6 +69,10 @@ __jited(" subq $0x8, %rsp")
__arch_arm64
__jited(" mov x25, sp")
__jited(" sub sp, sp, #0x10")
+__arch_riscv64
+__jited(" addi sp, sp, -0x30")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" addi s5, sp, 0x10")
__naked void no_private_stack_nested(void)
{
asm volatile (" \
@@ -113,6 +126,14 @@ __jited(" str x0, [x27]")
__jited(" bl {{.*}}")
__jited("...")
__jited(" ldp x25, x27, [sp], {{.*}}")
+__arch_riscv64
+__jited(" addi sp, sp, -0x20")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" sd s5, 0x8(sp)")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" sd a0, -0x200(s5)")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" ld s5, 0x8(sp)")
__naked void private_stack_nested_1(void)
{
asm volatile (" \
@@ -183,6 +204,16 @@ __jited(" bl 0x{{.*}}")
__jited(" mov x8, x0")
__jited(" mov x8, #0x0")
__jited(" ldp x25, x27, [sp], {{.*}}")
+__arch_riscv64
+__jited("func #1")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" addi sp, sp, -0x20")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" sd s5, 0x8(sp)")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" sd a0, -0x200(s5)")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" ld s5, 0x8(sp)")
__naked void private_stack_callback(void)
{
asm volatile (" \
@@ -313,6 +344,10 @@ __arch_arm64
__jited(" mrs x10, TPIDR_EL{{[0-1]}}")
__jited(" add x27, x27, x10")
__jited(" add x25, x27, {{.*}}")
+__arch_riscv64
+__jited(" addi sp, sp, -0x20")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" sd s5, 0x8(sp)")
int private_stack_async_callback_1(void)
{
struct bpf_timer *arr_timer;
@@ -342,6 +377,10 @@ __arch_x86_64
__jited(" subq $0x100, %rsp")
__arch_arm64
__jited(" sub sp, sp, #0x100")
+__arch_riscv64
+__jited(" addi sp, sp, -0x120")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" addi s5, sp, 0x100")
int private_stack_async_callback_2(void)
{
struct bpf_timer *arr_timer;
--
2.50.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chen Pei <cp0613@linux.alibaba.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
memxor@gmail.com, bjorn@kernel.org, puranjay@kernel.org
Cc: eddyz87@gmail.com, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, jolsa@kernel.org, emil@etsalapatis.com,
ihor.solodrai@linux.dev, pulehui@huawei.com, pjw@kernel.org,
palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr,
luke.r.nels@gmail.com, xi.wang@gmail.com, shuah@kernel.org,
rgbi3307@gmail.com, guoren@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] selftests/bpf: Enable private stack tests for riscv64
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:12:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261015021238.5657-3-cp0613@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015021238.5657-1-cp0613@linux.alibaba.com>
The RV64 JIT now supports the private stack. Allow the existing
verifier and struct_ops private-stack tests to run on riscv64 and add
the expected RV64 JITed instruction patterns.
Signed-off-by: Chen Pei <cp0613@linux.alibaba.com>
---
.../bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_private_stack.c | 3 +-
.../bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_private_stack.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_private_stack.c
index 2b3ec2b79091..103179ff8733 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_private_stack.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_private_stack.c
@@ -6,7 +6,8 @@
#include "struct_ops_private_stack_recur.skel.h"
#include "struct_ops_private_stack_large.skel.h"
-#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__aarch64__) || defined(__powerpc64__)
+#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__aarch64__) || defined(__powerpc64__) || \
+ (defined(__riscv) && __riscv_xlen == 64)
static void test_private_stack(void)
{
struct struct_ops_private_stack *skel;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c
index 3d9994a52464..d9cebbc7355d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_private_stack.c
@@ -8,7 +8,8 @@
/* From include/linux/filter.h */
#define MAX_BPF_STACK 512
-#if defined(__TARGET_ARCH_x86) || defined(__TARGET_ARCH_arm64)
+#if defined(__TARGET_ARCH_x86) || defined(__TARGET_ARCH_arm64) || \
+ (defined(__TARGET_ARCH_riscv) && __riscv_xlen == 64)
struct elem {
struct bpf_timer t;
@@ -42,6 +43,14 @@ __jited(" mov x0, #0x2a")
__jited(" str x0, [x27]")
__jited("...")
__jited(" ldp x25, x27, [sp], {{.*}}")
+__arch_riscv64
+__jited(" addi sp, sp, -0x20")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" sd s5, 0x10(sp)")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" sd a0, -0x100(s5)")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" ld s5, 0x10(sp)")
__naked void private_stack_single_prog(void)
{
asm volatile (" \
@@ -60,6 +69,10 @@ __jited(" subq $0x8, %rsp")
__arch_arm64
__jited(" mov x25, sp")
__jited(" sub sp, sp, #0x10")
+__arch_riscv64
+__jited(" addi sp, sp, -0x30")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" addi s5, sp, 0x10")
__naked void no_private_stack_nested(void)
{
asm volatile (" \
@@ -113,6 +126,14 @@ __jited(" str x0, [x27]")
__jited(" bl {{.*}}")
__jited("...")
__jited(" ldp x25, x27, [sp], {{.*}}")
+__arch_riscv64
+__jited(" addi sp, sp, -0x20")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" sd s5, 0x8(sp)")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" sd a0, -0x200(s5)")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" ld s5, 0x8(sp)")
__naked void private_stack_nested_1(void)
{
asm volatile (" \
@@ -183,6 +204,16 @@ __jited(" bl 0x{{.*}}")
__jited(" mov x8, x0")
__jited(" mov x8, #0x0")
__jited(" ldp x25, x27, [sp], {{.*}}")
+__arch_riscv64
+__jited("func #1")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" addi sp, sp, -0x20")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" sd s5, 0x8(sp)")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" sd a0, -0x200(s5)")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" ld s5, 0x8(sp)")
__naked void private_stack_callback(void)
{
asm volatile (" \
@@ -313,6 +344,10 @@ __arch_arm64
__jited(" mrs x10, TPIDR_EL{{[0-1]}}")
__jited(" add x27, x27, x10")
__jited(" add x25, x27, {{.*}}")
+__arch_riscv64
+__jited(" addi sp, sp, -0x20")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" sd s5, 0x8(sp)")
int private_stack_async_callback_1(void)
{
struct bpf_timer *arr_timer;
@@ -342,6 +377,10 @@ __arch_x86_64
__jited(" subq $0x100, %rsp")
__arch_arm64
__jited(" sub sp, sp, #0x100")
+__arch_riscv64
+__jited(" addi sp, sp, -0x120")
+__jited("...")
+__jited(" addi s5, sp, 0x100")
int private_stack_async_callback_2(void)
{
struct bpf_timer *arr_timer;
--
2.50.1
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-15 2:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-15 2:12 [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] riscv: bpf: Add BPF private stack support Chen Pei
2026-10-15 2:12 ` Chen Pei
2026-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] " Chen Pei
2026-10-15 2:12 ` Chen Pei
2026-10-15 2:58 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-15 2:58 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-15 2:12 ` Chen Pei [this message]
2026-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] selftests/bpf: Enable private stack tests for riscv64 Chen Pei
2026-10-15 2:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 8:00 ` Chen Pei
2026-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add a runtime test for private stack and stack arguments Chen Pei
2026-10-15 2:12 ` Chen Pei
2026-10-15 2:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 2:59 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-15 2:59 ` bot+bpf-ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261015021238.5657-3-cp0613@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=cp0613@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=luke.r.nels@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=pulehui@huawei.com \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=rgbi3307@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=xi.wang@gmail.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.