From: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>,
Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@oracle.com>,
David Faust <david.faust@oracle.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
"Jose E . Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>,
Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta@linux.dev>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 6/8] selftests/bpf: Cover record attributes in bpftool BTF dumps
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 17:00:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261016000012.2232059-7-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261016000012.2232059-1-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
Types whose field accesses need static offsets carry __bpf_core_pso,
while their nested anonymous records must stay unannotated. Other
records retain __bpf_core_pai, including context types such as
bpf_nf_ctx whose accesses do not need static offsets.
Extend the existing C dump test fixture with selected context and
socket types and recursively nested anonymous unions.
Signed-off-by: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
---
.../bpf/bpftool_btf_dump_sorted.expected | 24 ++++++++++
.../bpf/bpftool_btf_dump_unsorted.expected | 24 ++++++++++
.../bpf/prog_tests/bpftool_btf_dump.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 95 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_btf_dump_sorted.expected b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_btf_dump_sorted.expected
index 7da4df1da207..ee093f08d123 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_btf_dump_sorted.expected
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_btf_dump_sorted.expected
@@ -37,6 +37,30 @@ enum {
E0 = 1,
};
+struct __sk_buff {
+ int len;
+ union {
+ int sk;
+ };
+} __attribute__((__bpf_core_pso));
+
+struct bpf_nf_ctx {
+ int f;
+} __attribute__((__bpf_core_pai));
+
+struct bpf_sk_lookup {
+ union {
+ union {
+ int cookie;
+ };
+ int family;
+ };
+} __attribute__((__bpf_core_pso));
+
+struct bpf_tcp_sock {
+ int snd_cwnd;
+} __attribute__((__bpf_core_pso));
+
struct holey {
int c;
long: 32;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_btf_dump_unsorted.expected b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_btf_dump_unsorted.expected
index f082da51d630..42233e435a04 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_btf_dump_unsorted.expected
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_btf_dump_unsorted.expected
@@ -48,6 +48,30 @@ struct s {
int f;
} __attribute__((__bpf_core_pai));
+struct __sk_buff {
+ int len;
+ union {
+ int sk;
+ };
+} __attribute__((__bpf_core_pso));
+
+struct bpf_sk_lookup {
+ union {
+ union {
+ int cookie;
+ };
+ int family;
+ };
+} __attribute__((__bpf_core_pso));
+
+struct bpf_tcp_sock {
+ int snd_cwnd;
+} __attribute__((__bpf_core_pso));
+
+struct bpf_nf_ctx {
+ int f;
+} __attribute__((__bpf_core_pai));
+
/* BPF kfuncs */
#ifndef BPF_NO_KFUNC_PROTOTYPES
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpftool_btf_dump.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpftool_btf_dump.c
index 9104c059a315..0277f054410c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpftool_btf_dump.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpftool_btf_dump.c
@@ -20,6 +20,18 @@
* };
* enum { E0 = 1 };
* struct s { int f; };
+ * struct __sk_buff {
+ * int len;
+ * union { int sk; };
+ * };
+ * struct bpf_sk_lookup {
+ * union {
+ * union { int cookie; };
+ * int family;
+ * };
+ * };
+ * struct bpf_tcp_sock { int snd_cwnd; };
+ * struct bpf_nf_ctx { int f; };
*/
static struct btf *mk_btf(void)
{
@@ -42,6 +54,25 @@ static struct btf *mk_btf(void)
btf__add_struct(btf, "s", 4);
btf__add_field(btf, "f", 1, 0, 0);
+ btf__add_union(btf, NULL, 4);
+ btf__add_field(btf, "sk", 1, 0, 0);
+ btf__add_struct(btf, "__sk_buff", 8);
+ btf__add_field(btf, "len", 1, 0, 0);
+ btf__add_field(btf, NULL, 6, 32, 0);
+
+ btf__add_union(btf, NULL, 4);
+ btf__add_field(btf, "cookie", 1, 0, 0);
+ btf__add_union(btf, NULL, 4);
+ btf__add_field(btf, NULL, 8, 0, 0);
+ btf__add_field(btf, "family", 1, 0, 0);
+ btf__add_struct(btf, "bpf_sk_lookup", 4);
+ btf__add_field(btf, NULL, 9, 0, 0);
+
+ btf__add_struct(btf, "bpf_tcp_sock", 4);
+ btf__add_field(btf, "snd_cwnd", 1, 0, 0);
+ btf__add_struct(btf, "bpf_nf_ctx", 4);
+ btf__add_field(btf, "f", 1, 0, 0);
+
VALIDATE_RAW_BTF(
btf,
"[1] INT 'int' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED",
@@ -52,6 +83,22 @@ static struct btf *mk_btf(void)
"[4] ENUM '(anon)' encoding=UNSIGNED size=4 vlen=1\n"
"\t'E0' val=1",
"[5] STRUCT 's' size=4 vlen=1\n"
+ "\t'f' type_id=1 bits_offset=0",
+ "[6] UNION '(anon)' size=4 vlen=1\n"
+ "\t'sk' type_id=1 bits_offset=0",
+ "[7] STRUCT '__sk_buff' size=8 vlen=2\n"
+ "\t'len' type_id=1 bits_offset=0\n"
+ "\t'(anon)' type_id=6 bits_offset=32",
+ "[8] UNION '(anon)' size=4 vlen=1\n"
+ "\t'cookie' type_id=1 bits_offset=0",
+ "[9] UNION '(anon)' size=4 vlen=2\n"
+ "\t'(anon)' type_id=8 bits_offset=0\n"
+ "\t'family' type_id=1 bits_offset=0",
+ "[10] STRUCT 'bpf_sk_lookup' size=4 vlen=1\n"
+ "\t'(anon)' type_id=9 bits_offset=0",
+ "[11] STRUCT 'bpf_tcp_sock' size=4 vlen=1\n"
+ "\t'snd_cwnd' type_id=1 bits_offset=0",
+ "[12] STRUCT 'bpf_nf_ctx' size=4 vlen=1\n"
"\t'f' type_id=1 bits_offset=0");
return btf;
--
2.56.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 0:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-16 0:00 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/8] bpftool: Per-record CO-RE attributes in the C dump Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-16 0:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/8] bpftool: Dump C from a detached BTF copy Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-16 1:18 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-10-16 9:44 ` Alan Maguire
2026-10-16 9:25 ` Alan Maguire
2026-10-16 0:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/8] selftests/bpf: Cover unknown BTF header-extension bytes in btf dump Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-16 0:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/8] bpftool: Apply __bpf_core_pai per record on BTF dump Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-16 0:39 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-16 1:17 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-10-16 0:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/8] bpftool: Skip __bpf_core_pai on verifier-rewritten context types Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-16 0:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/8] bpftool: Emit __bpf_core_pso " Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-16 1:27 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-10-16 5:49 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-16 15:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-10-16 0:00 ` Ihor Solodrai [this message]
2026-10-16 0:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 7/8] selftests/bpf: Cover context and socket accesses through vmlinux.h Ihor Solodrai
2026-10-16 0:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 8/8] bpftool: Document __bpf_core_pai and __bpf_core_pso Ihor Solodrai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261016000012.2232059-7-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--to=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cupertino.miranda@oracle.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=david.faust@oracle.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=qmo@kernel.org \
--cc=vineet.gupta@linux.dev \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.