From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v2 3/5] selftests: drv-net: add an iperf performance test
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 10:03:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261016100337.271adfa3@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261005201115.2690830-4-sdf@fomichev.me>
On Mon, 5 Oct 2026 13:11:12 -0700 Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> Add the drivers/net/hw/performance target. Report throughput and
> retransmits from Iperf3Runner when requested.
>
> Single-stream iperf3 throughput is flaky and can change considerably
> between back-to-back runs on the same hosts.
>
> Tested on two mlx5 hosts. Captured metric output:
>
> # # ktap-metric-policy-json: {"display_label":"Gbps","name":"throughput","regression":{"better":"higher","compare":"p50","relative_tolerance":0.05},"summarize":"p50"}
> # # ktap-metric-policy-json: {"name":"tcp.retransmits","summarize":"max"}
> # # ktap-metric-json: {"host":"local","name":"throughput","time":10.685632,"type":"scalar","value":48.561920255183196}
> # # ktap-metric-json: {"host":"remote","name":"tcp.retransmits","time":10.68565,"type":"scalar","value":0}
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 2 +-
> .../drivers/net/hw/performance/Makefile | 10 +++++++
> .../drivers/net/hw/performance/config | 1 +
> .../drivers/net/hw/performance/iperf.py | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../drivers/net/hw/performance/settings | 1 +
> .../selftests/drivers/net/lib/py/load.py | 24 +++++++++++++++--
> 6 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/performance/Makefile
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/performance/config
> create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/performance/iperf.py
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/performance/settings
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
> index 273853937c25..7523f378e026 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ TARGETS_HOTPLUG = cpu-hotplug
> TARGETS_HOTPLUG += memory-hotplug
>
> # Networking tests want the net/lib target, include it automatically
> -ifneq ($(filter net drivers/net drivers/net/hw,$(TARGETS)),)
> +ifneq ($(filter net drivers/net drivers/net/hw drivers/net/hw/performance,$(TARGETS)),)
long strings, maybe let's s@/hw/perfromance@/perf@ ?
> ifeq ($(filter net/lib,$(TARGETS)),)
> INSTALL_DEP_TARGETS := net/lib
> endif
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/performance/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/performance/Makefile
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..5d53ef548306
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/performance/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +TEST_PROGS := iperf.py
here..
> +TEST_INCLUDES := \
> + $(wildcard ../lib/py/*.py ../../lib/py/*.py) \
> + $(wildcard ../../../../net/lib/py/*.py) \
> + #
.. and here -
not the exact correct format for the Makefile, pls look closer
> +include ../../../../lib.mk
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/performance/config b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/performance/config
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..6450f34933e6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/performance/config
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +CONFIG_IPV6=y
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/performance/iperf.py b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/performance/iperf.py
> new file mode 100755
> index 000000000000..415fb67f4100
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/performance/iperf.py
> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> +#!/usr/bin/env python3
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +"""Measure TCP throughput with iperf3."""
> +
> +from os import path
> +import sys
> +
> +sys.path.insert(0, path.join(path.dirname(path.abspath(__file__)), ".."))
Nasty hacks. Something is not laid out right, mister.
> +from lib.py import Iperf3Runner, NetDrvEpEnv, ksft_exit, ksft_run
> +
> +
> +def tcp(cfg):
> + """Measure TCP throughput."""
> + Iperf3Runner(cfg).measure_bandwidth(report=True)
> +
> +
> +def main():
> + """Run the iperf performance test."""
> + with NetDrvEpEnv(__file__, nsim_test=False) as cfg:
> + ksft_run([tcp], args=(cfg,))
> + ksft_exit()
> +
> +
> +if __name__ == "__main__":
> + main()
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/performance/settings b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/performance/settings
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e7b9417537fb
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/performance/settings
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +timeout=0
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/lib/py/load.py b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/lib/py/load.py
> index e24660e5c27f..a7da025b4e21 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/lib/py/load.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/lib/py/load.py
> @@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ import re
> import time
> import json
>
> -from lib.py import ksft_pr, cmd, ip, rand_port, wait_port_listen
> +from lib.py import cmd, ip, ksft_metric, ksft_metric_policy, ksft_pr, \
> + rand_port, wait_port_listen
>
>
> class Iperf3Runner:
> @@ -53,12 +54,20 @@ from lib.py import ksft_pr, cmd, ip, rand_port, wait_port_listen
> kwargs["timeout"] = duration + 5
> return cmd(cmdline, **kwargs)
>
> - def measure_bandwidth(self, reverse=False):
> + def measure_bandwidth(self, reverse=False, report=False):
> """
> Runs an iperf3 measurement and returns the average bandwidth (Gbps).
> Discards the first and last few reporting intervals and uses only the
> middle part of the run where throughput is typically stable.
> """
> + if report:
> + ksft_metric_policy(
> + "throughput", summarize="p50",
> + regression={"compare": "p50", "better": "higher",
> + "relative_tolerance": 0.05},
> + display_label="Gbps")
> + ksft_metric_policy("tcp.retransmits", summarize="max")
> +
> self.start_server()
> result = self.start_client(duration=10, reverse=reverse)
>
> @@ -77,6 +86,17 @@ from lib.py import ksft_pr, cmd, ip, rand_port, wait_port_listen
> stable = samples[3:-3]
>
> avg = sum(stable) / len(stable)
> + retransmits = out.get("end", {}).get("sum_sent", {}).get(
> + "retransmits")
> + if report:
> + if not isinstance(retransmits, int) or \
> + isinstance(retransmits, bool):
> + raise ValueError("iperf3 did not report TCP retransmits")
> + receiver = "remote" if reverse else "local"
> + sender = "local" if reverse else "remote"
> + ksft_metric("throughput", avg, kind="scalar", host=receiver)
> + ksft_metric("tcp.retransmits", retransmits, kind="scalar",
> + host=sender)
I'd be tempted to find a way to pass a callback to the class
for result reporting rather than teach the class how to report.
But just a thought, not sure which ends up being cleaner.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-05 20:11 [RFC net-next v2 0/5] selftests: net: add performance metric reporting Stanislav Fomichev
2026-10-05 20:11 ` [RFC net-next v2 1/5] selftests: net: py: add timestamped metric output Stanislav Fomichev
2026-10-16 16:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-05 20:11 ` [RFC net-next v2 2/5] selftests: net: py: add metric policy output Stanislav Fomichev
2026-10-16 16:59 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-05 20:11 ` [RFC net-next v2 3/5] selftests: drv-net: add an iperf performance test Stanislav Fomichev
2026-10-16 17:03 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-10-05 20:11 ` [RFC net-next v2 4/5] selftests: drv-net: add a kperf runner Stanislav Fomichev
2026-10-16 17:05 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-05 20:11 ` [RFC net-next v2 5/5] selftests: drv-net: measure devmem performance with kperf Stanislav Fomichev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261016100337.271adfa3@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.