All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
To: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	 Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
	Das Sandipan <Sandipan.Das@amd.com>,
	 Shukla Manali <Manali.Shukla@amd.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
	 Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Support PERF_METRICS MSR in mediated vPMU
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 11:27:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261023182743.3248481-1-jmattson@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918193937.569414-6-zide.chen@intel.com>

On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 12:39 PM Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>
> +static inline bool kvm_vcpu_has_perf_metrics(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	return kvm_vcpu_get_perf_caps(vcpu) & PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS;
> +}

The SDM, volume 3, section 22.3.9.3, says:

> IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL. EN_PERF_METRICS[48]: If this bit is set *and*
> fixed-function performance-monitoring counter 3 is enabled, built-in
> performance metrics are enabled. [emphasis mine]

and

> The values in MSR_PERF_METRICS are derived from fixed-function
> performance-monitoring counter 3.

Hence, a dependency on fixed counter 3 belongs in this predicate.
Perhaps something like:

	static inline bool kvm_pmu_has_fixed_counter(struct kvm_pmu *pmu,
						     unsigned int idx)
	{
		return idx < pmu->nr_arch_fixed_counters;
	}

	static inline bool kvm_vcpu_has_perf_metrics(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
	{
		return (kvm_vcpu_get_perf_caps(vcpu) & PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS) &&
		       kvm_pmu_has_fixed_counter(vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu),
						 INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED_SLOTS -
						 INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED);
	}

with intel_pmu_refresh() calling kvm_vcpu_has_perf_metrics() instead of
testing perf_capabilities directly. (nr_arch_fixed_counters has already
been computed at that point; all_valid_pmc_idx has not.)

KVM only supports contiguous fixed counters today (see patch 2), so a
simple comparison against nr_arch_fixed_counters suffices. However, if KVM
ever honors the CPUID.0AH:ECX fixed counter bitmap, a separate helper
keeps that assumption in one place.

As it stands, if userspace sets PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS for a version 1
vPMU, MSR_PERF_METRICS is passed through (kvm_vcpu_has_mediated_pmu()
only requires a non-zero version), but intel_pmu_refresh() bails out
before it gets to the PERF_METRICS code. With patch 11, that leaves
perf_metrics_rsvd at ~0ull, so a value the guest writes directly to
hardware can be saved with KVM_GET_MSRS, but not restored with
KVM_SET_MSRS.

Since nr_arch_fixed_counters is 0 for a v1 vPMU, the above handles that
case too. It also takes care of the METRICS_CLEAR_EN unmasking without
fixed counter 3 that Sashiko flagged on patch 12, and it obviates the
NULL pmc check in intel_emulate_rdpmc().

[...]

> +	case MSR_PERF_METRICS:
> +		pmu->perf_metrics = data;
> +		break;

On a part with only four metrics (e.g. Ice Lake), userspace can stuff
bits 63:32 into pmu->perf_metrics here, and the unchecked wrmsrq() in
intel_mediated_pmu_load() will then #GP on every VM-entry. Patch 11
isn't an optional follow-on; it needs to be folded into this patch.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-23 18:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-18 19:39 [PATCH v9 00/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Add hardware Topdown metrics support Zide Chen
2026-09-18 19:39 ` [PATCH v9 01/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Do not map fixed counters >= 3 to generic perf events Zide Chen
2026-09-18 19:39 ` [PATCH v9 02/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Support Intel fixed counter 3 on mediated vPMU Zide Chen
2026-09-18 19:39 ` [PATCH v9 03/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Rename and move vcpu_get_perf_capabilities() to pmu.h Zide Chen
2026-09-18 19:39 ` [PATCH v9 04/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Snapshot host IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES in kvm_host Zide Chen
2026-09-18 19:39 ` [PATCH v9 05/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Support PERF_METRICS MSR in mediated vPMU Zide Chen
2026-10-23 18:27   ` Jim Mattson [this message]
2026-10-27 21:30     ` Chen, Zide
2026-10-29 21:28       ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-10-30 19:25         ` Chen, Zide
2026-10-29 22:06   ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-10-29 23:17     ` Chen, Zide
2026-10-29 23:19       ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-10-29 23:26         ` Jim Mattson
2026-10-29 23:32           ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-10-30 15:47             ` Chen, Zide
2026-09-18 19:39 ` [PATCH v9 06/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Move RDPMC emulation into per-vendor callbacks Zide Chen
2026-09-18 19:39 ` [PATCH v9 07/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Emulate RDPMC on performance metrics Zide Chen
2026-10-23 18:33   ` Jim Mattson
2026-09-18 19:39 ` [PATCH v9 08/12] KVM: selftests: Add PERF_METRICS and fixed counter 3 tests Zide Chen
2026-09-18 20:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 20:45     ` Chen, Zide
2026-09-18 19:39 ` [PATCH v9 09/12] perf/x86: Add INTEL_TD_METRIC_FIELD_{BITS,MASK} constants Zide Chen
2026-09-18 19:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 20:45     ` Chen, Zide
2026-09-21  7:01   ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-10-27 21:39     ` Chen, Zide
2026-09-18 19:39 ` [PATCH v9 10/12] perf/x86: Expose number of Topdown metric events to KVM Zide Chen
2026-09-21  7:06   ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-09-18 19:39 ` [PATCH v9 11/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Reject writes to reserved MSR_PERF_METRICS bits Zide Chen
2026-09-21  7:11   ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-10-23 18:45   ` Jim Mattson
2026-10-27 22:09     ` Chen, Zide
2026-09-18 19:39 ` [PATCH v9 12/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Support RDPMC Metrics Clear Mode Zide Chen
2026-09-18 20:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 21:08     ` Chen, Zide
2026-09-21  9:39     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-10-27 22:56       ` Chen, Zide
2026-10-23 18:55   ` Jim Mattson
2026-10-27 22:17     ` Chen, Zide

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261023182743.3248481-1-jmattson@google.com \
    --to=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=Manali.Shukla@amd.com \
    --cc=Sandipan.Das@amd.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
    --cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.