* [PATCH v3 0/5] KVM: arm64: TCR_EL2 fixes, FEAT_LPA2=NI for NV
@ 2026-10-29 22:37 Oliver Upton
2026-10-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] KVM: arm64: nv: Don't advertise FEAT_LPA2 for guest stage-1 Oliver Upton
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Upton @ 2026-10-29 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvmarm
Cc: Marc Zyngier, Joey Gouly, Suzuki K Poulose, Zenghui Yu,
Wei-Lin Chang, Steffen Eiden, Fuad Tabba, Oliver Upton
I went ahead and grabbed Wei-Lin's series [1] that added TCR_EL2
sanitisation since it makes life quite a bit easier for computing an
effective TCR_EL1.
Tested on Neoverse-V2 running a guest with FEAT_E2H0.
v2 -> v3:
- Collect R-b's from Joey
- Add patch "KVM: arm64: nv: Correctly compute the effective TCR_EL1
for nVHE TCR_EL2", itself picking up fixes for forwarding missing
fields into the effective TCR_EL1 value (Fuad)
[*]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260917214215.74135-1-weilin.chang@arm.com/
Marc Zyngier (1):
KVM: arm64: Reset TCR_EL2 according to guest's E2H mode
Oliver Upton (1):
KVM: arm64: nv: Correctly compute the effective TCR_EL1 for nVHE
TCR_EL2
Wei-Lin Chang (3):
KVM: arm64: nv: Don't advertise FEAT_LPA2 for guest stage-1
arm64: sysreg: Add TCR_EL2 to sysreg infrastructure
KVM: arm64: Convert TCR_EL2 to config-driven sanitisation
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h | 13 ---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h | 38 +++++++--
arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 1 -
arch/arm64/kvm/config.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c | 15 ++++
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 10 ++-
arch/arm64/tools/sysreg | 125 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
8 files changed, 291 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
base-commit: 9e9283e4c941e806d2735f09b66763487bc48b50
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/5] KVM: arm64: nv: Don't advertise FEAT_LPA2 for guest stage-1
2026-10-29 22:37 [PATCH v3 0/5] KVM: arm64: TCR_EL2 fixes, FEAT_LPA2=NI for NV Oliver Upton
@ 2026-10-29 22:37 ` Oliver Upton
2026-10-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] arm64: sysreg: Add TCR_EL2 to sysreg infrastructure Oliver Upton
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Upton @ 2026-10-29 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvmarm
Cc: Marc Zyngier, Joey Gouly, Suzuki K Poulose, Zenghui Yu,
Wei-Lin Chang, Steffen Eiden, Fuad Tabba, stable, Oliver Upton
From: Wei-Lin Chang <weilin.chang@arm.com>
There is no FEAT_LPA2 support for NV guests as of now, but we missed
limiting it for the non-stage-2 granule size fields (TGRAN4, TGRAN16) in
ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1. Add the sanitisation.
Fixes: 9f75b6d447d7 ("KVM: arm64: nv: Filter out unsupported features from ID regs")
Signed-off-by: Wei-Lin Chang <weilin.chang@arm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
index 4d83281a7a28..cd0dabcf3f81 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
@@ -1875,6 +1875,17 @@ u64 limit_nv_id_reg(struct kvm *kvm, u32 reg, u64 val)
/* Hide CNTPOFF if present */
val = ID_REG_LIMIT_FIELD_ENUM(val, ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1, ECV, IMP);
+ /* NV does not support FEAT_LPA2. */
+ if (SYS_FIELD_GET(ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1, TGRAN4, val) == ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1_TGRAN4_52_BIT) {
+ val &= ~ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1_TGRAN4;
+ val |= SYS_FIELD_PREP_ENUM(ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1, TGRAN4, IMP);
+ }
+
+ if (SYS_FIELD_GET(ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1, TGRAN16, val) == ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1_TGRAN16_52_BIT) {
+ val &= ~ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1_TGRAN16;
+ val |= SYS_FIELD_PREP_ENUM(ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1, TGRAN16, IMP);
+ }
+
/* Disallow unsupported S2 page sizes */
switch (PAGE_SIZE) {
case SZ_64K:
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 2/5] arm64: sysreg: Add TCR_EL2 to sysreg infrastructure
2026-10-29 22:37 [PATCH v3 0/5] KVM: arm64: TCR_EL2 fixes, FEAT_LPA2=NI for NV Oliver Upton
2026-10-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] KVM: arm64: nv: Don't advertise FEAT_LPA2 for guest stage-1 Oliver Upton
@ 2026-10-29 22:37 ` Oliver Upton
2026-10-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] KVM: arm64: Reset TCR_EL2 according to guest's E2H mode Oliver Upton
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Upton @ 2026-10-29 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvmarm
Cc: Marc Zyngier, Joey Gouly, Suzuki K Poulose, Zenghui Yu,
Wei-Lin Chang, Steffen Eiden, Fuad Tabba, Mark Brown,
Oliver Upton
From: Wei-Lin Chang <weilin.chang@arm.com>
Convert TCR_EL2 to the sysreg infrastructure with data extracted from
Registers.json of the BSD licenced AARCHMRS
(AARCHMRS_OPENSOURCE_A_profile_FAT-2026-06).
There are two formats of TCR_EL2 based on whether the effective value of
HCR_EL2.E2H is 0 or 1. For the E2H == 1 case, prefix the macros with
"VHE_". For the E2H == 0 case, the macros are left unprefixed.
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Wei-Lin Chang <weilin.chang@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h | 13 ----
arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 1 -
arch/arm64/tools/sysreg | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
index ba0062849be9..3e1c9e31028e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
@@ -45,19 +45,6 @@
#define MPAMHCR_HOST_FLAGS 0
/* TCR_EL2 Registers bits */
-#define TCR_EL2_DS (1UL << 32)
-#define TCR_EL2_RES1 ((1U << 31) | (1 << 23))
-#define TCR_EL2_HPD (1 << 24)
-#define TCR_EL2_HA (1 << 21)
-#define TCR_EL2_TBI (1 << 20)
-#define TCR_EL2_PS_SHIFT 16
-#define TCR_EL2_PS_MASK (7 << TCR_EL2_PS_SHIFT)
-#define TCR_EL2_PS_40B (2 << TCR_EL2_PS_SHIFT)
-#define TCR_EL2_TG0_MASK TCR_TG0_MASK
-#define TCR_EL2_SH0_MASK TCR_SH0_MASK
-#define TCR_EL2_ORGN0_MASK TCR_ORGN0_MASK
-#define TCR_EL2_IRGN0_MASK TCR_IRGN0_MASK
-#define TCR_EL2_T0SZ_MASK 0x3f
#define TCR_EL2_MASK (TCR_EL2_TG0_MASK | TCR_EL2_SH0_MASK | \
TCR_EL2_ORGN0_MASK | TCR_EL2_IRGN0_MASK)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
index aa65603455a2..fee89cd667d9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
@@ -519,7 +519,6 @@
#define SYS_TTBR0_EL2 sys_reg(3, 4, 2, 0, 0)
#define SYS_TTBR1_EL2 sys_reg(3, 4, 2, 0, 1)
-#define SYS_TCR_EL2 sys_reg(3, 4, 2, 0, 2)
#define SYS_VTTBR_EL2 sys_reg(3, 4, 2, 1, 0)
#define SYS_HAFGRTR_EL2 sys_reg(3, 4, 3, 1, 6)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
index 893b5f9df575..bbe32dee55f9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
+++ b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
@@ -5612,6 +5612,131 @@ Res0 6
Field 5:0 T0SZ
EndSysreg
+Sysreg TCR_EL2 3 4 2 0 2
+Prefix VHE
+Res0 63:62
+Field 61 MTX1
+Field 60 MTX0
+Field 59 DS
+Field 58 TCMA1
+Field 57 TCMA0
+Field 56 E0PD1
+Field 55 E0PD0
+Field 54 NFD1
+Field 53 NFD0
+Field 52 TBID1
+Field 51 TBID0
+Field 50 HWU162
+Field 49 HWU161
+Field 48 HWU160
+Field 47 HWU159
+Field 46 HWU062
+Field 45 HWU061
+Field 44 HWU060
+Field 43 HWU059
+Field 42 HPD1
+Field 41 HPD0
+Field 40 HD
+Field 39 HA
+Field 38 TBI1
+Field 37 TBI0
+Field 36 AS
+Res0 35
+Field 34:32 IPS
+Enum 31:30 TG1
+ 0b01 16K
+ 0b10 4K
+ 0b11 64K
+EndEnum
+Enum 29:28 SH1
+ 0b00 NONE
+ 0b10 OUTER
+ 0b11 INNER
+EndEnum
+Enum 27:26 ORGN1
+ 0b00 NC
+ 0b01 WBWA
+ 0b10 WT
+ 0b11 WBnWA
+EndEnum
+Enum 25:24 IRGN1
+ 0b00 NC
+ 0b01 WBWA
+ 0b10 WT
+ 0b11 WBnWA
+EndEnum
+Field 23 EPD1
+Field 22 A1
+Field 21:16 T1SZ
+Enum 15:14 TG0
+ 0b00 4K
+ 0b01 64K
+ 0b10 16K
+EndEnum
+Enum 13:12 SH0
+ 0b00 NONE
+ 0b10 OUTER
+ 0b11 INNER
+EndEnum
+Enum 11:10 ORGN0
+ 0b00 NC
+ 0b01 WBWA
+ 0b10 WT
+ 0b11 WBnWA
+EndEnum
+Enum 9:8 IRGN0
+ 0b00 NC
+ 0b01 WBWA
+ 0b10 WT
+ 0b11 WBnWA
+EndEnum
+Field 7 EPD0
+Res0 6
+Field 5:0 T0SZ
+EndPrefix
+Res0 63:34
+Field 33 MTX
+Field 32 DS
+Res1 31
+Field 30 TCMA
+Field 29 TBID
+Field 28 HWU62
+Field 27 HWU61
+Field 26 HWU60
+Field 25 HWU59
+Field 24 HPD
+Res1 23
+Field 22 HD
+Field 21 HA
+Field 20 TBI
+Res0 19
+Field 18:16 PS
+Enum 15:14 TG0
+ 0b00 4K
+ 0b01 64K
+ 0b10 16K
+EndEnum
+Enum 13:12 SH0
+ 0b00 NONE
+ 0b10 OUTER
+ 0b11 INNER
+EndEnum
+Enum 11:10 ORGN0
+ 0b00 NC
+ 0b01 WBWA
+ 0b10 WT
+ 0b11 WBnWA
+EndEnum
+Enum 9:8 IRGN0
+ 0b00 NC
+ 0b01 WBWA
+ 0b10 WT
+ 0b11 WBnWA
+EndEnum
+Res0 7:6
+Field 5:0 T0SZ
+EndSysreg
+
Sysreg TCR_EL12 3 5 2 0 2
Mapping TCR_EL1
EndSysreg
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 3/5] KVM: arm64: Reset TCR_EL2 according to guest's E2H mode
2026-10-29 22:37 [PATCH v3 0/5] KVM: arm64: TCR_EL2 fixes, FEAT_LPA2=NI for NV Oliver Upton
2026-10-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] KVM: arm64: nv: Don't advertise FEAT_LPA2 for guest stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-10-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] arm64: sysreg: Add TCR_EL2 to sysreg infrastructure Oliver Upton
@ 2026-10-29 22:37 ` Oliver Upton
2026-10-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] KVM: arm64: Convert TCR_EL2 to config-driven sanitisation Oliver Upton
2026-10-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] KVM: arm64: nv: Correctly compute the effective TCR_EL1 for nVHE TCR_EL2 Oliver Upton
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Upton @ 2026-10-29 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvmarm
Cc: Marc Zyngier, Joey Gouly, Suzuki K Poulose, Zenghui Yu,
Wei-Lin Chang, Steffen Eiden, Fuad Tabba, Oliver Upton
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Previously vCPU TCR_EL2's reset value didn't consider TCR_EL2's
different formats based on the value of HCR_EL2.E2H. It always resets to
the E2H == 0 version.
This didn't cause any problem because the bits set in the E2H == 0
version (TCR_EL2_RES1) all reset to UNKNOWN for E2H == 1 per the
architecture.
Still, it's better to fix it. Choose the correct reset value by checking
KVM_ARM_VCPU_HAS_EL2_E2H0.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Wei-Lin Chang <weilin.chang@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 0687b78cd7c2..bc880d777442 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -3273,6 +3273,14 @@ static u64 reset_mdcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
return vcpu->kvm->arch.nr_pmu_counters;
}
+static u64 reset_tcr_el2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
+{
+ __vcpu_assign_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg,
+ vcpu_has_feature(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_HAS_EL2_E2H0) ?
+ TCR_EL2_RES1 : VHE_TCR_EL2_RES1);
+ return __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
+}
+
/*
* Architected system registers.
* Important: Must be sorted ascending by Op0, Op1, CRn, CRm, Op2
@@ -3851,7 +3859,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
EL2_REG(TTBR0_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
EL2_REG(TTBR1_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
- EL2_REG(TCR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, TCR_EL2_RES1),
+ EL2_REG(TCR_EL2, access_rw, reset_tcr_el2, 0),
EL2_REG_FILTERED(TCR2_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, TCR2_EL2_RES1,
tcr2_el2_visibility),
EL2_REG_VNCR(VTTBR_EL2, reset_val, 0),
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 4/5] KVM: arm64: Convert TCR_EL2 to config-driven sanitisation
2026-10-29 22:37 [PATCH v3 0/5] KVM: arm64: TCR_EL2 fixes, FEAT_LPA2=NI for NV Oliver Upton
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-10-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] KVM: arm64: Reset TCR_EL2 according to guest's E2H mode Oliver Upton
@ 2026-10-29 22:37 ` Oliver Upton
2026-10-30 1:26 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-10-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] KVM: arm64: nv: Correctly compute the effective TCR_EL1 for nVHE TCR_EL2 Oliver Upton
4 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Upton @ 2026-10-29 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvmarm
Cc: Marc Zyngier, Joey Gouly, Suzuki K Poulose, Zenghui Yu,
Wei-Lin Chang, Steffen Eiden, Fuad Tabba, Oliver Upton
From: Wei-Lin Chang <weilin.chang@arm.com>
Feature dependencies of the fields in TCR_EL2 are extracted from
Registers.json of the BSD licenced AARCHMRS
(AARCHMRS_OPENSOURCE_A_profile_FAT-2026-06).
Places where we slightly deviate from the above:
- Stick to the ARM ARM M.c requirement for TCR_EL2.TCMA*, which only
depends on FEAT_MTE2. This avoids updating ID_AA64PFR2_EL1 with new
VMTE* definitions that we don't know the meaning of, as they aren't
present in the ARM ARM yet.
- Ignore TCR_EL2.DS's requirement of needing the effective value of
TCR2_EL2.D128 be 0. This requires runtime detection of TCR2_EL2.D128
and we don't have D128 support yet.
- TCR_EL2.AS is dependent on FEAT_ASID16, this information is missing
from the json.
Signed-off-by: Wei-Lin Chang <weilin.chang@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
arch/arm64/kvm/config.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c | 4 ++
3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 95de3dd23fa1..eda8bfcc5eaa 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -598,7 +598,6 @@ enum vcpu_sysreg {
HACR_EL2, /* Hypervisor Auxiliary Control Register */
TTBR0_EL2, /* Translation Table Base Register 0 (EL2) */
TTBR1_EL2, /* Translation Table Base Register 1 (EL2) */
- TCR_EL2, /* Translation Control Register (EL2) */
PIRE0_EL2, /* Permission Indirection Register 0 (EL2) */
PIR_EL2, /* Permission Indirection Register 1 (EL2) */
POR_EL2, /* Permission Overlay Register 2 (EL2) */
@@ -623,6 +622,7 @@ enum vcpu_sysreg {
/* Anything from this can be RES0/RES1 sanitised */
MARKER(__SANITISED_REG_START__),
SCTLR_EL2, /* System Control Register (EL2) */
+ TCR_EL2, /* Translation Control Register (EL2) */
TCR2_EL2, /* Extended Translation Control Register (EL2) */
SCTLR2_EL2, /* System Control Register 2 (EL2) */
MDCR_EL2, /* Monitor Debug Configuration Register (EL2) */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/config.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/config.c
index cfdb6c713320..31ceac9f271a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/config.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/config.c
@@ -219,7 +219,9 @@ struct reg_feat_map_desc {
#define FEAT_CPA2 ID_AA64ISAR3_EL1, CPA, CPA2
#define FEAT_ASID2 ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1, ASID2, IMP
#define FEAT_MEC ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1, MEC, IMP
+#define FEAT_HAF ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1, HAFDBS, AF
#define FEAT_HAFT ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1, HAFDBS, HAFT
+#define FEAT_HAFDBS ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1, HAFDBS, DBM
#define FEAT_HDBSS ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1, HAFDBS, HDBSS
#define FEAT_HPDS ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1, HPDS, IMP
#define FEAT_HPDS2 ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1, HPDS, HPDS2
@@ -232,6 +234,10 @@ struct reg_feat_map_desc {
#define FEAT_MixedEndEL0 ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1, BIGENDEL0, IMP
#define FEAT_MTE_ASYNC ID_AA64PFR1_EL1, MTE_frac, ASYNC
#define FEAT_MTE_STORE_ONLY ID_AA64PFR2_EL1, MTESTOREONLY, IMP
+#define FEAT_MTE_CANONICAL_TAGS ID_AA64PFR1_EL1, MTEX, MTE4
+#define FEAT_MTE_NO_ADDRESS_TAGS ID_AA64PFR1_EL1, MTEX, MTE4
+#define FEAT_E0PD ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1, E0PD, IMP
+#define FEAT_SVE ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, SVE, IMP
#define FEAT_PAN ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1, PAN, IMP
#define FEAT_PAN3 ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1, PAN, PAN3
#define FEAT_SSBS ID_AA64PFR1_EL1, SSBS, IMP
@@ -244,6 +250,19 @@ struct reg_feat_map_desc {
#define FEAT_GCIE ID_AA64PFR2_EL1, GCIE, IMP
#define FEAT_NV3 ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1, NV_frac, NV3
+static bool feat_asid16(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ return kvm_has_feat_enum(kvm, ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1, ASIDBITS, 16);
+}
+
+static bool feat_mte_no_addr_tags_or_canonical_tags(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ bool no_addr_tags = kvm_has_feat(kvm, FEAT_MTE_NO_ADDRESS_TAGS);
+ bool canonical_tags = kvm_has_feat(kvm, FEAT_MTE_CANONICAL_TAGS);
+
+ return no_addr_tags || canonical_tags;
+}
+
static bool not_feat_aa64el3(struct kvm *kvm)
{
return !kvm_has_feat(kvm, FEAT_AA64EL3);
@@ -1080,6 +1099,91 @@ static const struct reg_bits_to_feat_map sctlr2_feat_map[] = {
static const DECLARE_FEAT_MAP(sctlr2_desc, SCTLR2_EL1,
sctlr2_feat_map, FEAT_SCTLR2);
+static const struct reg_bits_to_feat_map vhe_tcr_el2_feat_map[] = {
+ NEEDS_FEAT(VHE_TCR_EL2_MTX1 |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_MTX0,
+ feat_mte_no_addr_tags_or_canonical_tags),
+ NEEDS_FEAT(VHE_TCR_EL2_DS, feat_lpa2),
+ NEEDS_FEAT(VHE_TCR_EL2_TCMA1 |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_TCMA0,
+ FEAT_MTE2),
+ NEEDS_FEAT(VHE_TCR_EL2_E0PD1 |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_E0PD0,
+ FEAT_E0PD),
+ NEEDS_FEAT(VHE_TCR_EL2_NFD1 |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_NFD0,
+ FEAT_SVE),
+ NEEDS_FEAT(VHE_TCR_EL2_TBID1 |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_TBID0,
+ feat_pauth),
+ NEEDS_FEAT(VHE_TCR_EL2_HWU162 |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_HWU161 |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_HWU160 |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_HWU159 |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_HWU062 |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_HWU061 |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_HWU060 |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_HWU059,
+ FEAT_HPDS2),
+ NEEDS_FEAT(VHE_TCR_EL2_HPD1 |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_HPD0,
+ FEAT_HPDS),
+ NEEDS_FEAT(VHE_TCR_EL2_HD, FEAT_HAFDBS),
+ NEEDS_FEAT(VHE_TCR_EL2_HA, FEAT_HAF),
+ NEEDS_FEAT(VHE_TCR_EL2_AS, feat_asid16),
+ NEEDS_FEAT(VHE_TCR_EL2_TBI1 |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_TBI0 |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_IPS |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_TG1 |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_SH1 |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_ORGN1 |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_IRGN1 |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_EPD1 |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_A1 |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_T1SZ |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_TG0 |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_SH0 |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_ORGN0 |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_IRGN0 |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_EPD0 |
+ VHE_TCR_EL2_T0SZ,
+ FEAT_AA64EL2),
+ FORCE_RES0(VHE_TCR_EL2_RES0),
+ FORCE_RES1(VHE_TCR_EL2_RES1),
+};
+
+static const DECLARE_FEAT_MAP(vhe_tcr_el2_desc, VHE_TCR_EL2,
+ vhe_tcr_el2_feat_map, FEAT_AA64EL2);
+
+static const struct reg_bits_to_feat_map tcr_el2_feat_map[] = {
+ NEEDS_FEAT(TCR_EL2_MTX,
+ feat_mte_no_addr_tags_or_canonical_tags),
+ NEEDS_FEAT(TCR_EL2_DS, feat_lpa2),
+ NEEDS_FEAT(TCR_EL2_TCMA, FEAT_MTE2),
+ NEEDS_FEAT(TCR_EL2_TBID, feat_pauth),
+ NEEDS_FEAT(TCR_EL2_HWU62 |
+ TCR_EL2_HWU61 |
+ TCR_EL2_HWU60 |
+ TCR_EL2_HWU59,
+ FEAT_HPDS2),
+ NEEDS_FEAT(TCR_EL2_HPD, FEAT_HPDS),
+ NEEDS_FEAT(TCR_EL2_HD, FEAT_HAFDBS),
+ NEEDS_FEAT(TCR_EL2_HA, FEAT_HAF),
+ NEEDS_FEAT(TCR_EL2_TBI |
+ TCR_EL2_PS |
+ TCR_EL2_TG0 |
+ TCR_EL2_SH0 |
+ TCR_EL2_ORGN0 |
+ TCR_EL2_IRGN0 |
+ TCR_EL2_T0SZ,
+ FEAT_AA64EL2),
+ FORCE_RES0(TCR_EL2_RES0),
+ FORCE_RES1(TCR_EL2_RES1),
+};
+
+static const DECLARE_FEAT_MAP(tcr_el2_desc, TCR_EL2,
+ tcr_el2_feat_map, FEAT_AA64EL2);
+
static const struct reg_bits_to_feat_map tcr2_el2_feat_map[] = {
NEEDS_FEAT_FLAG(TCR2_EL2_FNG1 |
TCR2_EL2_FNG0 |
@@ -1442,6 +1546,8 @@ void __init check_feature_map(void)
check_reg_desc(&hcr_desc);
check_reg_desc(&nvhcr_desc);
check_reg_desc(&sctlr2_desc);
+ check_reg_desc(&vhe_tcr_el2_desc);
+ check_reg_desc(&tcr_el2_desc);
check_reg_desc(&tcr2_el2_desc);
check_reg_desc(&sctlr_el1_desc);
check_reg_desc(&sctlr_el2_desc);
@@ -1689,6 +1795,12 @@ struct resx get_reg_fixed_bits(struct kvm *kvm, enum vcpu_sysreg reg)
case SCTLR2_EL2:
resx = compute_reg_resx_bits(kvm, &sctlr2_desc, 0, 0);
break;
+ case TCR_EL2:
+ if (kvm_has_feat(kvm, FEAT_E2H0))
+ resx = compute_reg_resx_bits(kvm, &tcr_el2_desc, 0, 0);
+ else
+ resx = compute_reg_resx_bits(kvm, &vhe_tcr_el2_desc, 0, 0);
+ break;
case TCR2_EL2:
resx = compute_reg_resx_bits(kvm, &tcr2_el2_desc, 0, 0);
break;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
index cd0dabcf3f81..78fa433774c6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
@@ -2101,6 +2101,10 @@ int kvm_init_nv_sysregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
resx = get_reg_fixed_bits(kvm, HFGITR2_EL2);
set_sysreg_masks(kvm, HFGITR2_EL2, resx);
+ /* TCR_EL2 */
+ resx = get_reg_fixed_bits(kvm, TCR_EL2);
+ set_sysreg_masks(kvm, TCR_EL2, resx);
+
/* TCR2_EL2 */
resx = get_reg_fixed_bits(kvm, TCR2_EL2);
set_sysreg_masks(kvm, TCR2_EL2, resx);
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 5/5] KVM: arm64: nv: Correctly compute the effective TCR_EL1 for nVHE TCR_EL2
2026-10-29 22:37 [PATCH v3 0/5] KVM: arm64: TCR_EL2 fixes, FEAT_LPA2=NI for NV Oliver Upton
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2026-10-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] KVM: arm64: Convert TCR_EL2 to config-driven sanitisation Oliver Upton
@ 2026-10-29 22:37 ` Oliver Upton
2026-10-30 1:13 ` Wei-Lin Chang
4 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Upton @ 2026-10-29 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvmarm
Cc: Marc Zyngier, Joey Gouly, Suzuki K Poulose, Zenghui Yu,
Wei-Lin Chang, Steffen Eiden, Fuad Tabba, Oliver Upton, stable
It would appear that nVHE hypervisor support has a few warts which
shouldn't come as a surprise. Several fields in TCR_EL2 for features
supported in the VM (TCR_EL2.HA for example) are not correctly
propagated to the effective value of TCR_EL1.
Forward fields in bulk from nVHE TCR_EL2 to the effective TCR_EL1,
relying on config-based sanitisation to enforce the RESx behavior of
unsupported features. Deal with the slightly annoying case where the
E2H==0 bitfield names are not annotated by TTBR like they are in E2H==1.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.18+
Fixes: d5bbb76f4474 ("KVM: arm64: nv: Expose hardware access flag management to NV guests")
Fixes: 3606e0b2e462 ("KVM: arm64: nv: Add non-VHE-EL2->EL1 translation helpers")
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
index 0f899addafa8..27ec73da02c6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
@@ -20,16 +20,36 @@ static inline u64 tcr_el2_ps_to_tcr_el1_ips(u64 tcr_el2)
return (u64)FIELD_GET(TCR_EL2_PS_MASK, tcr_el2) << TCR_IPS_SHIFT;
}
-static inline u64 translate_tcr_el2_to_tcr_el1(u64 tcr)
+#define __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe(nfld, vfld, nvhe, vhe) \
+ FIELD_MODIFY(VHE_TCR_EL2_##vfld, vhe, FIELD_GET(TCR_EL2_##nfld, *(nvhe)))
+
+#define __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe_field(fld, nvhe, vhe) \
+ __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe(fld, fld, nvhe, vhe)
+
+static inline u64 translate_tcr_el2_to_tcr_el1(u64 nvhe)
{
- return TCR_EPD1_MASK | /* disable TTBR1_EL1 */
- ((tcr & TCR_EL2_DS) ? TCR_DS : 0) |
- ((tcr & TCR_EL2_TBI) ? TCR_TBI0 : 0) |
- tcr_el2_ps_to_tcr_el1_ips(tcr) |
- (tcr & TCR_EL2_TG0_MASK) |
- (tcr & TCR_EL2_ORGN0_MASK) |
- (tcr & TCR_EL2_IRGN0_MASK) |
- (tcr & TCR_EL2_T0SZ_MASK);
+ u64 vhe = VHE_TCR_EL2_EPD1 | /* disable TTBR1_EL1 */
+ tcr_el2_ps_to_tcr_el1_ips(nvhe);
+
+ __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe(MTX, MTX0, &nvhe, &vhe);
+ __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe(TCMA, TCMA0, &nvhe, &vhe);
+ __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe(TBID, TBID0, &nvhe, &vhe);
+ __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe(HWU62, HWU062, &nvhe, &vhe);
+ __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe(HWU61, HWU061, &nvhe, &vhe);
+ __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe(HWU60, HWU060, &nvhe, &vhe);
+ __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe(HWU59, HWU059, &nvhe, &vhe);
+ __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe(HPD, HPD0, &nvhe, &vhe);
+ __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe(TBI, TBI0, &nvhe, &vhe);
+ __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe_field( DS, &nvhe, &vhe);
+ __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe_field( HA, &nvhe, &vhe);
+ __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe_field( HD, &nvhe, &vhe);
+ __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe_field( TG0, &nvhe, &vhe);
+ __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe_field( SH0, &nvhe, &vhe);
+ __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe_field( ORGN0, &nvhe, &vhe);
+ __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe_field( IRGN0, &nvhe, &vhe);
+ __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe_field( T0SZ, &nvhe, &vhe);
+
+ return vhe;
}
static inline u64 translate_cptr_el2_to_cpacr_el1(u64 cptr_el2)
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] KVM: arm64: nv: Correctly compute the effective TCR_EL1 for nVHE TCR_EL2
2026-10-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] KVM: arm64: nv: Correctly compute the effective TCR_EL1 for nVHE TCR_EL2 Oliver Upton
@ 2026-10-30 1:13 ` Wei-Lin Chang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Wei-Lin Chang @ 2026-10-30 1:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oliver Upton, kvmarm
Cc: Marc Zyngier, Joey Gouly, Suzuki K Poulose, Zenghui Yu,
Steffen Eiden, Fuad Tabba, stable
On Thu, Oct 29, 2026 at 03:37:32PM -0700, Oliver Upton wrote:
> It would appear that nVHE hypervisor support has a few warts which
> shouldn't come as a surprise. Several fields in TCR_EL2 for features
> supported in the VM (TCR_EL2.HA for example) are not correctly
> propagated to the effective value of TCR_EL1.
>
> Forward fields in bulk from nVHE TCR_EL2 to the effective TCR_EL1,
> relying on config-based sanitisation to enforce the RESx behavior of
> unsupported features. Deal with the slightly annoying case where the
> E2H==0 bitfield names are not annotated by TTBR like they are in E2H==1.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.18+
> Fixes: d5bbb76f4474 ("KVM: arm64: nv: Expose hardware access flag management to NV guests")
> Fixes: 3606e0b2e462 ("KVM: arm64: nv: Add non-VHE-EL2->EL1 translation helpers")
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Wei-Lin Chang <weilin.chang@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
> index 0f899addafa8..27ec73da02c6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
> @@ -20,16 +20,36 @@ static inline u64 tcr_el2_ps_to_tcr_el1_ips(u64 tcr_el2)
> return (u64)FIELD_GET(TCR_EL2_PS_MASK, tcr_el2) << TCR_IPS_SHIFT;
> }
>
> -static inline u64 translate_tcr_el2_to_tcr_el1(u64 tcr)
> +#define __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe(nfld, vfld, nvhe, vhe) \
> + FIELD_MODIFY(VHE_TCR_EL2_##vfld, vhe, FIELD_GET(TCR_EL2_##nfld, *(nvhe)))
> +
> +#define __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe_field(fld, nvhe, vhe) \
> + __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe(fld, fld, nvhe, vhe)
> +
> +static inline u64 translate_tcr_el2_to_tcr_el1(u64 nvhe)
> {
> - return TCR_EPD1_MASK | /* disable TTBR1_EL1 */
> - ((tcr & TCR_EL2_DS) ? TCR_DS : 0) |
> - ((tcr & TCR_EL2_TBI) ? TCR_TBI0 : 0) |
> - tcr_el2_ps_to_tcr_el1_ips(tcr) |
> - (tcr & TCR_EL2_TG0_MASK) |
> - (tcr & TCR_EL2_ORGN0_MASK) |
> - (tcr & TCR_EL2_IRGN0_MASK) |
> - (tcr & TCR_EL2_T0SZ_MASK);
> + u64 vhe = VHE_TCR_EL2_EPD1 | /* disable TTBR1_EL1 */
> + tcr_el2_ps_to_tcr_el1_ips(nvhe);
> +
> + __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe(MTX, MTX0, &nvhe, &vhe);
> + __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe(TCMA, TCMA0, &nvhe, &vhe);
> + __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe(TBID, TBID0, &nvhe, &vhe);
> + __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe(HWU62, HWU062, &nvhe, &vhe);
> + __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe(HWU61, HWU061, &nvhe, &vhe);
> + __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe(HWU60, HWU060, &nvhe, &vhe);
> + __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe(HWU59, HWU059, &nvhe, &vhe);
> + __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe(HPD, HPD0, &nvhe, &vhe);
> + __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe(TBI, TBI0, &nvhe, &vhe);
> + __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe_field( DS, &nvhe, &vhe);
> + __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe_field( HA, &nvhe, &vhe);
> + __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe_field( HD, &nvhe, &vhe);
> + __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe_field( TG0, &nvhe, &vhe);
> + __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe_field( SH0, &nvhe, &vhe);
> + __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe_field( ORGN0, &nvhe, &vhe);
> + __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe_field( IRGN0, &nvhe, &vhe);
> + __xlate_tcr_nvhe_to_vhe_field( T0SZ, &nvhe, &vhe);
> +
> + return vhe;
> }
>
> static inline u64 translate_cptr_el2_to_cpacr_el1(u64 cptr_el2)
> --
> 2.47.3
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] KVM: arm64: Convert TCR_EL2 to config-driven sanitisation
2026-10-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] KVM: arm64: Convert TCR_EL2 to config-driven sanitisation Oliver Upton
@ 2026-10-30 1:26 ` Wei-Lin Chang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Wei-Lin Chang @ 2026-10-30 1:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oliver Upton, kvmarm
Cc: Marc Zyngier, Joey Gouly, Suzuki K Poulose, Zenghui Yu,
Steffen Eiden, Fuad Tabba
Hi Oliver,
I have checked TCR_EL2 information in the latest 2026-09 release,
the only difference is it correctly states TCR_EL2.AS is dependent on
FEAT_ASID16 now, like what Joey said.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2026 at 03:37:31PM -0700, Oliver Upton wrote:
> From: Wei-Lin Chang <weilin.chang@arm.com>
>
> Feature dependencies of the fields in TCR_EL2 are extracted from
> Registers.json of the BSD licenced AARCHMRS
> (AARCHMRS_OPENSOURCE_A_profile_FAT-2026-06).
So if you like you can change this to 2026-09,
>
> Places where we slightly deviate from the above:
>
> - Stick to the ARM ARM M.c requirement for TCR_EL2.TCMA*, which only
and change this to M.d,
> depends on FEAT_MTE2. This avoids updating ID_AA64PFR2_EL1 with new
> VMTE* definitions that we don't know the meaning of, as they aren't
> present in the ARM ARM yet.
>
> - Ignore TCR_EL2.DS's requirement of needing the effective value of
> TCR2_EL2.D128 be 0. This requires runtime detection of TCR2_EL2.D128
> and we don't have D128 support yet.
>
> - TCR_EL2.AS is dependent on FEAT_ASID16, this information is missing
> from the json.
and remove this item.
Not that these stay up to date for long though, but just thought I'd
point them out.
Thanks,
Wei-Lin Chang
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei-Lin Chang <weilin.chang@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
> ---
[...]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-30 1:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-29 22:37 [PATCH v3 0/5] KVM: arm64: TCR_EL2 fixes, FEAT_LPA2=NI for NV Oliver Upton
2026-10-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] KVM: arm64: nv: Don't advertise FEAT_LPA2 for guest stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-10-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] arm64: sysreg: Add TCR_EL2 to sysreg infrastructure Oliver Upton
2026-10-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] KVM: arm64: Reset TCR_EL2 according to guest's E2H mode Oliver Upton
2026-10-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] KVM: arm64: Convert TCR_EL2 to config-driven sanitisation Oliver Upton
2026-10-30 1:26 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-10-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] KVM: arm64: nv: Correctly compute the effective TCR_EL1 for nVHE TCR_EL2 Oliver Upton
2026-10-30 1:13 ` Wei-Lin Chang
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.