From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: scardracs@disroot.org, denis.benato@linux.dev, w_armin@gmx.de,
ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] platform/x86: asus-wmi: Serialize WMI method evaluations with a mutex" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2026 06:05:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261107060506-failed-5.15-b9428edaf410@kernel.org> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x b9428edaf4109e86a97254228d831767d0acc1f8
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '20261107060506-failed-5.15-b9428edaf410@kernel.org' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' 'HEAD^..'
Thanks,
Sasha
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From b9428edaf4109e86a97254228d831767d0acc1f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marco Scardovi <scardracs@disroot.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 11:14:59 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] platform/x86: asus-wmi: Serialize WMI method evaluations with
a mutex
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Concurrent evaluations of ASUS WMI management methods (from ACPI notify,
HID, userspace daemons, and debugfs) enter the BIOS ACPI/SMM interface
simultaneously, triggering re-entrant SMIs or EC mailbox buffer corruption.
Fix this at the root by introducing a centralized evaluation helper
(asus_wmi_evaluate_method_locked()) protected by a global mutex
(asus_wmi_eval_lock) using guard(mutex). Route all evaluations of
ASUS_WMI_MGMT_GUID (method3, method5, method_buf, and show_call) through
this helper.
A static mutex is required because asus_wmi_evaluate_method() is an
exported symbol used by external modules (such as hid-asus and
asus-armoury) that lack access to struct asus_wmi drvdata, and the
underlying ASUS ACPI/EC management method is a single physical platform
resource.
The mutex is non-recursive: nested ACPI/WMI notify handlers must not call
back into evaluate on the same task (defer via workqueue, as
asus_rfkill_notify already does).
The sysfs-versus-notify race predates the later export of
asus_wmi_evaluate_method(), so Fixes points at the original shared
evaluate helper rather than that export.
Link: https://github.com/OpenGamingCollective/asusctl/issues/328
Fixes: d33da3b68669 ("asus-wmi: factorise wmi_evaluate_method call")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Marco Scardovi <scardracs@disroot.org>
Reviewed-by: Denis Benato <denis.benato@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/b6a1981777e63f0c28bd719d8203ebbda57d6957.1789722252.git.scardracs@disroot.org
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
index a2e552b207fba..60fbe13e100fe 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/backlight.h>
#include <linux/bits.h>
+#include <linux/cleanup.h>
#include <linux/debugfs.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/dmi.h>
@@ -28,6 +29,7 @@
#include <linux/leds.h>
#include <linux/minmax.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/pci.h>
#include <linux/pci_hotplug.h>
#include <linux/platform_data/x86/asus-wmi.h>
@@ -353,6 +355,20 @@ static void asus_wmi_show_deprecated(void)
/* WMI ************************************************************************/
+/*
+ * Concurrent evaluations of ASUS WMI methods can re-enter firmware
+ * SMI/EC mailbox handling and corrupt the mailbox.
+ */
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(asus_wmi_eval_lock);
+
+static acpi_status asus_wmi_evaluate_method_locked(u32 method_id,
+ struct acpi_buffer *input,
+ struct acpi_buffer *output)
+{
+ guard(mutex)(&asus_wmi_eval_lock);
+ return wmi_evaluate_method(ASUS_WMI_MGMT_GUID, 0, method_id, input, output);
+}
+
static int asus_wmi_evaluate_method3(u32 method_id,
u32 arg0, u32 arg1, u32 arg2, u32 *retval)
{
@@ -367,8 +383,7 @@ static int asus_wmi_evaluate_method3(u32 method_id,
union acpi_object *obj;
u32 tmp = 0;
- status = wmi_evaluate_method(ASUS_WMI_MGMT_GUID, 0, method_id,
- &input, &output);
+ status = asus_wmi_evaluate_method_locked(method_id, &input, &output);
pr_debug("%s called (0x%08x) with args: 0x%08x, 0x%08x, 0x%08x\n",
__func__, method_id, arg0, arg1, arg2);
@@ -419,8 +434,7 @@ static int asus_wmi_evaluate_method5(u32 method_id,
union acpi_object *obj;
u32 tmp = 0;
- status = wmi_evaluate_method(ASUS_WMI_MGMT_GUID, 0, method_id,
- &input, &output);
+ status = asus_wmi_evaluate_method_locked(method_id, &input, &output);
pr_debug("%s called (0x%08x) with args: 0x%08x, 0x%08x, 0x%08x, 0x%08x, 0x%08x\n",
__func__, method_id, arg0, arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4);
@@ -467,8 +481,7 @@ static int asus_wmi_evaluate_method_buf(u32 method_id,
union acpi_object *obj;
int err = 0;
- status = wmi_evaluate_method(ASUS_WMI_MGMT_GUID, 0, method_id,
- &input, &output);
+ status = asus_wmi_evaluate_method_locked(method_id, &input, &output);
pr_debug("%s called (0x%08x) with args: 0x%08x, 0x%08x\n",
__func__, method_id, arg0, arg1);
@@ -5092,9 +5105,8 @@ static int show_call(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
union acpi_object *obj;
acpi_status status;
- status = wmi_evaluate_method(ASUS_WMI_MGMT_GUID,
- 0, asus->debug.method_id,
- &input, &output);
+ status = asus_wmi_evaluate_method_locked(asus->debug.method_id,
+ &input, &output);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
return -EIO;
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-11-07 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-07 11:05 Sasha Levin [this message]
2026-11-10 16:47 ` [PATCH 5.15.y] platform/x86: asus-wmi: Serialize WMI method evaluations with a mutex Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261107060506-failed-5.15-b9428edaf410@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=denis.benato@linux.dev \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=scardracs@disroot.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=w_armin@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.