From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Marco Scardovi" <scardracs@disroot.org>,
"Denis Benato" <denis.benato@linux.dev>,
"Armin Wolf" <W_Armin@gmx.de>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Sasha Levin" <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15.y] platform/x86: asus-wmi: Serialize WMI method evaluations with a mutex
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 11:47:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261110164642.2537372-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261107060506-failed-5.15-b9428edaf410@kernel.org>
From: Marco Scardovi <scardracs@disroot.org>
[ Upstream commit b9428edaf4109e86a97254228d831767d0acc1f8 ]
Concurrent evaluations of ASUS WMI management methods (from ACPI notify,
HID, userspace daemons, and debugfs) enter the BIOS ACPI/SMM interface
simultaneously, triggering re-entrant SMIs or EC mailbox buffer corruption.
Fix this at the root by introducing a centralized evaluation helper
(asus_wmi_evaluate_method_locked()) protected by a global mutex
(asus_wmi_eval_lock) using guard(mutex). Route all evaluations of
ASUS_WMI_MGMT_GUID (method3, method5, method_buf, and show_call) through
this helper.
A static mutex is required because asus_wmi_evaluate_method() is an
exported symbol used by external modules (such as hid-asus and
asus-armoury) that lack access to struct asus_wmi drvdata, and the
underlying ASUS ACPI/EC management method is a single physical platform
resource.
The mutex is non-recursive: nested ACPI/WMI notify handlers must not call
back into evaluate on the same task (defer via workqueue, as
asus_rfkill_notify already does).
The sysfs-versus-notify race predates the later export of
asus_wmi_evaluate_method(), so Fixes points at the original shared
evaluate helper rather than that export.
Link: https://github.com/OpenGamingCollective/asusctl/issues/328
Fixes: d33da3b68669 ("asus-wmi: factorise wmi_evaluate_method call")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Marco Scardovi <scardracs@disroot.org>
Reviewed-by: Denis Benato <denis.benato@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/b6a1981777e63f0c28bd719d8203ebbda57d6957.1789722252.git.scardracs@disroot.org
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
[ sashal: Replaced the guard(mutex)-based helper with explicit mutex_lock()/mutex_unlock() calls at the two existing evaluation sites. ]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
index 7714a8327021f..09b9d4679b617 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
@@ -249,6 +250,12 @@ struct asus_wmi {
/* WMI ************************************************************************/
+/*
+ * Concurrent evaluations of ASUS WMI methods can re-enter firmware
+ * SMI/EC mailbox handling and corrupt the mailbox.
+ */
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(asus_wmi_eval_lock);
+
static int asus_wmi_evaluate_method3(u32 method_id,
u32 arg0, u32 arg1, u32 arg2, u32 *retval)
{
@@ -263,8 +270,10 @@ static int asus_wmi_evaluate_method3(u32 method_id,
union acpi_object *obj;
u32 tmp = 0;
+ mutex_lock(&asus_wmi_eval_lock);
status = wmi_evaluate_method(ASUS_WMI_MGMT_GUID, 0, method_id,
&input, &output);
+ mutex_unlock(&asus_wmi_eval_lock);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
return -EIO;
@@ -2906,9 +2915,11 @@ static int show_call(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
union acpi_object *obj;
acpi_status status;
+ mutex_lock(&asus_wmi_eval_lock);
status = wmi_evaluate_method(ASUS_WMI_MGMT_GUID,
0, asus->debug.method_id,
&input, &output);
+ mutex_unlock(&asus_wmi_eval_lock);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
return -EIO;
--
2.53.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-07 11:05 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] platform/x86: asus-wmi: Serialize WMI method evaluations with a mutex" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree Sasha Levin
2026-11-10 16:47 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261110164642.2537372-1-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=W_Armin@gmx.de \
--cc=denis.benato@linux.dev \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=scardracs@disroot.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.