All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alessio Ferri <alessio.ferri@mythread.it>
To: Luca Casati <luk00casati@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, johannes@sipsolutions.net,
	arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless-next v2 3/5] b43: N-PHY: fix rev3+ RSSI calibration
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2026 13:00:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261107130051.000038d4@mythread.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106211516.273791-4-luk00casati@gmail.com>

Il giorno Fri,  6 Nov 2026 22:15:14 +0100
Luca Casati <luk00casati@gmail.com> ha scritto:

> Three bugs in b43_nphy_rev3_rssi_cal():
> 
> - On rev7+ the selected VCM was written using the loop counter (8
> after the search loop) instead of vcm_final; the 3-bit field turned
> that into VCM 0 on every rev7+ PHY.
> - The distance used I*I + Q*I instead of I*I + Q*Q (brcmsmac
>   wlc_phy_rssi_cal_nphy_rev3()).
> - Negative W1/W2 offsets were rounded as -(abs(x + 4) / 8) instead of
>   -((abs(x) + 4) / 8).
> 
> mmiotraces: https://github.com/Luca00casati/b43patch/blob/755c2d8/traces/excerpts/patch3-rssi-vcm.txt
> 
> Found and fixed with the help of an AI coding assistant (Claude Opus
> 5.5), by comparing mmiotraces of b43 and wl on the same card.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luca Casati <luk00casati@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c index
> 6b0140f05..36c07d891 100644 ---
> a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c +++
> b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c @@ -2167,7 +2167,7 @@
> static void b43_nphy_rev3_rssi_cal(struct b43_wldev *dev) continue;
>  			for (vcm = 0; vcm < 8; vcm++) {
>  				currd = results[vcm][i] *
> results[vcm][i] +
> -					results[vcm][i + 1] *
> results[vcm][i];
> +					results[vcm][i + 1] *
> results[vcm][i + 1]; if (currd < mind) {
>  					mind = currd;
>  					minvcm = vcm;

Ok, in the original there was probably a copy paste error.

> @@ -2184,7 +2184,7 @@ static void b43_nphy_rev3_rssi_cal(struct
> b43_wldev *dev) b43_radio_maskset(dev,
>  					  core ?
> R2057_NB_MASTER_CORE1 : R2057_NB_MASTER_CORE0,
> -					  ~R2057_VCM_MASK, vcm);
> +					  ~R2057_VCM_MASK,
> vcm_final); else
>  			b43_radio_maskset(dev, r |
> B2056_RX_RSSI_MISC, 0xE3, vcm_final << 2);

ok, vcm is clearly wrong, the loop is meant select vcm_final, vcm
simply hold the last loop index.

> @@ -2219,7 +2219,7 @@ static void b43_nphy_rev3_rssi_cal(struct
> b43_wldev *dev) if (j / 2 == core) {
>  					offset[j] = 232 -
> poll_results[j]; if (offset[j] < 0)
> -						offset[j] =
> -(abs(offset[j] + 4) / 8);
> +						offset[j] =
> -((abs(offset[j]) + 4) / 8); else
>  						offset[j] =
> (offset[j] + 4) / 8; b43_nphy_scale_offset_rssi(dev, 0,

Fine

This change the code also for other revs, correct?

_______________________________________________
b43-dev mailing list
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alessio Ferri <alessio.ferri@mythread.it>
To: Luca Casati <luk00casati@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, johannes@sipsolutions.net,
	arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless-next v2 3/5] b43: N-PHY: fix rev3+ RSSI calibration
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2026 13:00:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261107130051.000038d4@mythread.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106211516.273791-4-luk00casati@gmail.com>

Il giorno Fri,  6 Nov 2026 22:15:14 +0100
Luca Casati <luk00casati@gmail.com> ha scritto:

> Three bugs in b43_nphy_rev3_rssi_cal():
> 
> - On rev7+ the selected VCM was written using the loop counter (8
> after the search loop) instead of vcm_final; the 3-bit field turned
> that into VCM 0 on every rev7+ PHY.
> - The distance used I*I + Q*I instead of I*I + Q*Q (brcmsmac
>   wlc_phy_rssi_cal_nphy_rev3()).
> - Negative W1/W2 offsets were rounded as -(abs(x + 4) / 8) instead of
>   -((abs(x) + 4) / 8).
> 
> mmiotraces: https://github.com/Luca00casati/b43patch/blob/755c2d8/traces/excerpts/patch3-rssi-vcm.txt
> 
> Found and fixed with the help of an AI coding assistant (Claude Opus
> 5.5), by comparing mmiotraces of b43 and wl on the same card.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luca Casati <luk00casati@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c index
> 6b0140f05..36c07d891 100644 ---
> a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c +++
> b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c @@ -2167,7 +2167,7 @@
> static void b43_nphy_rev3_rssi_cal(struct b43_wldev *dev) continue;
>  			for (vcm = 0; vcm < 8; vcm++) {
>  				currd = results[vcm][i] *
> results[vcm][i] +
> -					results[vcm][i + 1] *
> results[vcm][i];
> +					results[vcm][i + 1] *
> results[vcm][i + 1]; if (currd < mind) {
>  					mind = currd;
>  					minvcm = vcm;

Ok, in the original there was probably a copy paste error.

> @@ -2184,7 +2184,7 @@ static void b43_nphy_rev3_rssi_cal(struct
> b43_wldev *dev) b43_radio_maskset(dev,
>  					  core ?
> R2057_NB_MASTER_CORE1 : R2057_NB_MASTER_CORE0,
> -					  ~R2057_VCM_MASK, vcm);
> +					  ~R2057_VCM_MASK,
> vcm_final); else
>  			b43_radio_maskset(dev, r |
> B2056_RX_RSSI_MISC, 0xE3, vcm_final << 2);

ok, vcm is clearly wrong, the loop is meant select vcm_final, vcm
simply hold the last loop index.

> @@ -2219,7 +2219,7 @@ static void b43_nphy_rev3_rssi_cal(struct
> b43_wldev *dev) if (j / 2 == core) {
>  					offset[j] = 232 -
> poll_results[j]; if (offset[j] < 0)
> -						offset[j] =
> -(abs(offset[j] + 4) / 8);
> +						offset[j] =
> -((abs(offset[j]) + 4) / 8); else
>  						offset[j] =
> (offset[j] + 4) / 8; b43_nphy_scale_offset_rssi(dev, 0,

Fine

This change the code also for other revs, correct?

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-07 12:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-06 21:15 [PATCH wireless-next v2 0/5] b43: N-PHY: fix calibrations on rev7+ (BCM43228) Luca Casati
2026-11-06 21:15 ` Luca Casati
2026-11-06 21:15 ` [PATCH wireless-next v2 1/5] b43: N-PHY: fix the TX tone sample table Luca Casati
2026-11-06 21:15   ` Luca Casati
2026-11-06 22:12   ` Alessio Ferri
2026-11-06 22:12     ` Alessio Ferri
2026-11-06 21:15 ` [PATCH wireless-next v2 2/5] b43: N-PHY: fix TX IQ/LO calibration Luca Casati
2026-11-06 21:15   ` Luca Casati
2026-11-06 21:15 ` [PATCH wireless-next v2 3/5] b43: N-PHY: fix rev3+ RSSI calibration Luca Casati
2026-11-06 21:15   ` Luca Casati
2026-11-07 12:00   ` Alessio Ferri [this message]
2026-11-07 12:00     ` Alessio Ferri
2026-11-06 21:15 ` [PATCH wireless-next v2 4/5] b43: N-PHY: use wl's delays in the 2057 RC calibration Luca Casati
2026-11-06 21:15   ` Luca Casati
2026-11-06 21:15 ` [PATCH wireless-next v2 5/5] b43: N-PHY: add the missing override to the rev7 TX_PU command Luca Casati
2026-11-06 21:15   ` Luca Casati
2026-11-07 11:48 ` [PATCH wireless-next v2 0/5] b43: N-PHY: fix calibrations on rev7+ (BCM43228) Alessio Ferri
2026-11-07 11:48   ` Alessio Ferri

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261107130051.000038d4@mythread.it \
    --to=alessio.ferri@mythread.it \
    --cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
    --cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luk00casati@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.