All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [sudeep-holla:for-next/arm_fw/updates 2/2] drivers/firmware/arm/smccc/smccc.c:21:21: sparse: sparse: symbol 'smccc_soc_id_version' was not declared. Should it be static?
@ 2026-11-09 19:37 kernel test robot
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2026-11-09 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sudeep Holla; +Cc: oe-kbuild-all, Yeoreum Yun, Suzuki K Poulose

Hi Sudeep,

First bad commit (maybe != root cause):

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sudeep.holla/linux.git for-next/arm_fw/updates
head:   49c49ca0c4d02848a9576f72c4741c38c5ba09de
commit: 49c49ca0c4d02848a9576f72c4741c38c5ba09de [2/2] firmware: arm: Group interface drivers under arm/
config: arm64-randconfig-r2311-20261109 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20261109/202611092008.peLqOBq7-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.3.0
sparse: v0.6.5-rc1-21-g84ec0658
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20261109/202611092008.peLqOBq7-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202611092008.peLqOBq7-lkp@intel.com/

sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/firmware/arm/smccc/smccc.c:21:21: sparse: sparse: symbol 'smccc_soc_id_version' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> drivers/firmware/arm/smccc/smccc.c:22:21: sparse: sparse: symbol 'smccc_soc_id_revision' was not declared. Should it be static?

vim +/smccc_soc_id_version +21 drivers/firmware/arm/smccc/smccc.c

f2ae97062a48b1 drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c Sudeep Holla       2020-05-18  19  
a37e31fc97efe7 drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c Andre Przywara     2021-01-06  20  bool __ro_after_init smccc_trng_available = false;
35727af2b15d98 drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c Shanker Donthineni 2023-03-18 @21  s32 __ro_after_init smccc_soc_id_version = SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
35727af2b15d98 drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c Shanker Donthineni 2023-03-18 @22  s32 __ro_after_init smccc_soc_id_revision = SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
a37e31fc97efe7 drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c Andre Przywara     2021-01-06  23  

:::::: The code at line 21 was first introduced by commit
:::::: 35727af2b15d98a2dd2811d631d3a3886111312e irqchip/gicv3: Workaround for NVIDIA erratum T241-FABRIC-4

:::::: TO: Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>
:::::: CC: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2026-11-09 19:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-11-09 19:37 [sudeep-holla:for-next/arm_fw/updates 2/2] drivers/firmware/arm/smccc/smccc.c:21:21: sparse: sparse: symbol 'smccc_soc_id_version' was not declared. Should it be static? kernel test robot

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.