* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] lib/cmdline: fix get_options() count and overflow with large ranges" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree
@ 2026-11-07 10:53 Sasha Levin
2026-11-11 3:26 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 1/2] lib/tests: extend cmdline KUnit with next_arg() tests Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-11-07 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: armaan.sandhu0504, akpm, lzsx618, andriy.shevchenko; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 5d72266218b1c4dd2917f1df2b86f3b0e0a605c9
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '20261107055303-failed-6.1-5d72266218b1@kernel.org' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' 'HEAD^..'
Thanks,
Sasha
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 5d72266218b1c4dd2917f1df2b86f3b0e0a605c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Armaan Sandhu <armaan.sandhu0504@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 17:39:45 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] lib/cmdline: fix get_options() count and overflow with large
ranges
get_range() stops writing once the array is full, but get_options() still
advances its index by the whole range. So "1-100" parsed into four ints
reports 99 numbers, and a range like "0-2147483647" wraps the index
negative and writes outside the array.
Stop once a range fills the array, bail out in validation mode before the
count overflows, and saturate the range length in get_range(). Add KUnit
cases; without the fix "0-2147483647" panics the test kernel.
Only root can supply this input, so this is a robustness fix.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: add additional test case from Leizhen]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20261005213945.359905-1-armaan.sandhu0504@gmail.com
Fixes: 22f2e2801799 ("[PATCH] get_options to allow a hypenated range for isolcpus")
Signed-off-by: Armaan Sandhu <armaan.sandhu0504@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reported-by: Leizhen Zhang <lzsx618@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Leizhen Zhang <lzsx618@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
---
lib/cmdline.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
lib/tests/cmdline_kunit.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/cmdline.c b/lib/cmdline.c
index 16cce6621cec1..40b98d943a9ae 100644
--- a/lib/cmdline.c
+++ b/lib/cmdline.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/overflow.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/ctype.h>
@@ -26,7 +27,9 @@ static int get_range(char **str, int *pint, int n)
(*str)++;
upper_range = simple_strtol((*str), NULL, 0);
- inc_counter = upper_range - *pint;
+ /* Keep the sign of the result when the difference doesn't fit */
+ if (check_sub_overflow(upper_range, *pint, &inc_counter))
+ inc_counter = upper_range < *pint ? -1 : INT_MAX;
for (x = *pint; n && x < upper_range; x++, n--)
*pint++ = x;
return inc_counter;
@@ -122,6 +125,14 @@ char *get_options(const char *str, int nints, int *ints)
range_nums = get_range((char **)&str, pint, n);
if (range_nums < 0)
break;
+ /* The range didn't fit, so the array is full */
+ if (!validate && range_nums > n) {
+ i = nints;
+ break;
+ }
+ /* Leave room for the upper number of the range */
+ if (range_nums >= INT_MAX - i)
+ break;
/*
* Decrement the result by one to leave out the
* last number in the range. The next iteration
diff --git a/lib/tests/cmdline_kunit.c b/lib/tests/cmdline_kunit.c
index 3f61ff8d31782..12b85f255b651 100644
--- a/lib/tests/cmdline_kunit.c
+++ b/lib/tests/cmdline_kunit.c
@@ -140,6 +140,44 @@ static void cmdline_test_range(struct kunit *test)
} while (++i < ARRAY_SIZE(cmdline_test_range_strings));
}
+static const struct {
+ const char *in;
+ int parsed[4];
+ int validated;
+} cmdline_test_range_overflow_cases[] = {
+ { "1-100", { 3, 1, 2, 3, }, 100, },
+ { "1,5-100,7", { 3, 1, 5, 6, }, 98, },
+ { "1-2147483646", { 3, 1, 2, 3, }, 2147483646, },
+ { "0-2147483647", { 3, 0, 1, 2, }, 0, },
+ { "-5-2147483647", { 3, -5, -4, -3, }, 0, },
+ { "2147483647--5", { 0, 2147483647, }, 0, },
+ { "1,0-2147483647", { 3, 1, 0, 1, }, 1, },
+};
+
+static void cmdline_test_range_overflow(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ unsigned int i, j;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cmdline_test_range_overflow_cases); i++) {
+ const char *in = cmdline_test_range_overflow_cases[i].in;
+ const int *e = cmdline_test_range_overflow_cases[i].parsed;
+ /* Two guard elements past the array handed to get_options() */
+ int r[ARRAY_SIZE(cmdline_test_range_overflow_cases[0].parsed) + 2];
+ int n;
+
+ memset(r, 0, sizeof(r));
+ get_options(in, ARRAY_SIZE(r) - 2, r);
+ for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(r) - 2; j++)
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, r[j], e[j], "Pattern: %s at %u", in, j);
+ for (; j < ARRAY_SIZE(r); j++)
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, r[j], 0, "Pattern: %s out of bound at %u", in, j);
+
+ get_options(in, 0, &n);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, n, cmdline_test_range_overflow_cases[i].validated,
+ "Pattern: %s (validated)", in);
+ }
+}
+
static void cmdline_test_next_arg_quoted_value(struct kunit *test)
{
char in[] = "foo=\"bar baz\" qux=1";
@@ -258,6 +296,7 @@ static struct kunit_case cmdline_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(cmdline_test_lead_int),
KUNIT_CASE(cmdline_test_tail_int),
KUNIT_CASE(cmdline_test_range),
+ KUNIT_CASE(cmdline_test_range_overflow),
KUNIT_CASE(cmdline_test_next_arg_quoted_value),
KUNIT_CASE(cmdline_test_next_arg_bare_quote_regression),
KUNIT_CASE(cmdline_test_next_arg_mixed_tokens),
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [PATCH 6.1.y 1/2] lib/tests: extend cmdline KUnit with next_arg() tests
2026-11-07 10:53 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] lib/cmdline: fix get_options() count and overflow with large ranges" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree Sasha Levin
@ 2026-11-11 3:26 ` Sasha Levin
2026-11-11 3:26 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 2/2] lib/cmdline: fix get_options() count and overflow with large ranges Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-11-11 3:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable
Cc: Shuvam Pandey, Andy Shevchenko, Neel Natu, Dmitry Antipov,
Darrick J. Wong, Kees Cook, Andrew Morton, Sasha Levin
From: Shuvam Pandey <shuvampandey1@gmail.com>
[ Upstream commit dcc8a57815534e3844f342b28ecfb6e626a816a0 ]
The cmdline KUnit suite covers get_option() and get_options(), but it
does not exercise next_arg().
Extend the suite with one test for a quoted value containing spaces and
one regression test for a bare quote token after a normal parameter.
The regression test covers the bare quote token path fixed by commit
9847f21225c4 ("lib/cmdline: avoid page fault in next_arg").
[shuvampandey1@gmail.com: extend cmdline next_arg() coverage with mixed tokens]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260316211249.88601-1-shuvampandey1@gmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260316101227.15807-1-shuvampandey1@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Shuvam Pandey <shuvampandey1@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Cc: Neel Natu <neelnatu@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Stable-dep-of: 5d72266218b1 ("lib/cmdline: fix get_options() count and overflow with large ranges")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
lib/cmdline_kunit.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/cmdline_kunit.c b/lib/cmdline_kunit.c
index 705b82736be08..20d525aa23eda 100644
--- a/lib/cmdline_kunit.c
+++ b/lib/cmdline_kunit.c
@@ -139,11 +139,73 @@ static void cmdline_test_range(struct kunit *test)
} while (++i < ARRAY_SIZE(cmdline_test_range_strings));
}
+static void cmdline_test_next_arg_quoted_value(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ char in[] = "foo=\"bar baz\" qux=1";
+ char *next, *param, *val;
+
+ next = next_arg(in, ¶m, &val);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, param, "foo");
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, val);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, val, "bar baz");
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, next, "qux=1");
+
+ next = next_arg(next, ¶m, &val);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, param, "qux");
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, val);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, val, "1");
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, next, "");
+}
+
+static void cmdline_test_next_arg_bare_quote_regression(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ char in[] = "foo=bar \"";
+ char *next, *param, *val;
+
+ next = next_arg(in, ¶m, &val);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, param, "foo");
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, val);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, val, "bar");
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, next, "\"");
+
+ /* This hits the i == 0 quoted-token case fixed by 9847f21225c4. */
+ next = next_arg(next, ¶m, &val);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, param, "");
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, val, NULL);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, next, "");
+}
+
+static void cmdline_test_next_arg_mixed_tokens(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ char in[] = "bbb= jjj kkk=\"a=b\"";
+ char *next, *param, *val;
+
+ next = next_arg(in, ¶m, &val);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, param, "bbb");
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, val);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, val, "");
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, next, "jjj kkk=\"a=b\"");
+
+ next = next_arg(next, ¶m, &val);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, param, "jjj");
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, val);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, next, "kkk=\"a=b\"");
+
+ next = next_arg(next, ¶m, &val);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, param, "kkk");
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, val);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, val, "a=b");
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, next, "");
+}
+
static struct kunit_case cmdline_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(cmdline_test_noint),
KUNIT_CASE(cmdline_test_lead_int),
KUNIT_CASE(cmdline_test_tail_int),
KUNIT_CASE(cmdline_test_range),
+ KUNIT_CASE(cmdline_test_next_arg_quoted_value),
+ KUNIT_CASE(cmdline_test_next_arg_bare_quote_regression),
+ KUNIT_CASE(cmdline_test_next_arg_mixed_tokens),
{}
};
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [PATCH 6.1.y 2/2] lib/cmdline: fix get_options() count and overflow with large ranges
2026-11-11 3:26 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 1/2] lib/tests: extend cmdline KUnit with next_arg() tests Sasha Levin
@ 2026-11-11 3:26 ` Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-11-11 3:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable
Cc: Armaan Sandhu, Andrew Morton, Leizhen Zhang, Andy Shevchenko,
Sasha Levin
From: Armaan Sandhu <armaan.sandhu0504@gmail.com>
[ Upstream commit 5d72266218b1c4dd2917f1df2b86f3b0e0a605c9 ]
get_range() stops writing once the array is full, but get_options() still
advances its index by the whole range. So "1-100" parsed into four ints
reports 99 numbers, and a range like "0-2147483647" wraps the index
negative and writes outside the array.
Stop once a range fills the array, bail out in validation mode before the
count overflows, and saturate the range length in get_range(). Add KUnit
cases; without the fix "0-2147483647" panics the test kernel.
Only root can supply this input, so this is a robustness fix.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: add additional test case from Leizhen]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20261005213945.359905-1-armaan.sandhu0504@gmail.com
Fixes: 22f2e2801799 ("[PATCH] get_options to allow a hypenated range for isolcpus")
Signed-off-by: Armaan Sandhu <armaan.sandhu0504@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reported-by: Leizhen Zhang <lzsx618@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Leizhen Zhang <lzsx618@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
lib/cmdline.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
lib/cmdline_kunit.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/cmdline.c b/lib/cmdline.c
index 90ed997d95701..f5dc59b3548e9 100644
--- a/lib/cmdline.c
+++ b/lib/cmdline.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/overflow.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/ctype.h>
@@ -26,7 +27,9 @@ static int get_range(char **str, int *pint, int n)
(*str)++;
upper_range = simple_strtol((*str), NULL, 0);
- inc_counter = upper_range - *pint;
+ /* Keep the sign of the result when the difference doesn't fit */
+ if (check_sub_overflow(upper_range, *pint, &inc_counter))
+ inc_counter = upper_range < *pint ? -1 : INT_MAX;
for (x = *pint; n && x < upper_range; x++, n--)
*pint++ = x;
return inc_counter;
@@ -122,6 +125,14 @@ char *get_options(const char *str, int nints, int *ints)
range_nums = get_range((char **)&str, pint, n);
if (range_nums < 0)
break;
+ /* The range didn't fit, so the array is full */
+ if (!validate && range_nums > n) {
+ i = nints;
+ break;
+ }
+ /* Leave room for the upper number of the range */
+ if (range_nums >= INT_MAX - i)
+ break;
/*
* Decrement the result by one to leave out the
* last number in the range. The next iteration
diff --git a/lib/cmdline_kunit.c b/lib/cmdline_kunit.c
index 20d525aa23eda..e720f056c84df 100644
--- a/lib/cmdline_kunit.c
+++ b/lib/cmdline_kunit.c
@@ -139,6 +139,44 @@ static void cmdline_test_range(struct kunit *test)
} while (++i < ARRAY_SIZE(cmdline_test_range_strings));
}
+static const struct {
+ const char *in;
+ int parsed[4];
+ int validated;
+} cmdline_test_range_overflow_cases[] = {
+ { "1-100", { 3, 1, 2, 3, }, 100, },
+ { "1,5-100,7", { 3, 1, 5, 6, }, 98, },
+ { "1-2147483646", { 3, 1, 2, 3, }, 2147483646, },
+ { "0-2147483647", { 3, 0, 1, 2, }, 0, },
+ { "-5-2147483647", { 3, -5, -4, -3, }, 0, },
+ { "2147483647--5", { 0, 2147483647, }, 0, },
+ { "1,0-2147483647", { 3, 1, 0, 1, }, 1, },
+};
+
+static void cmdline_test_range_overflow(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ unsigned int i, j;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cmdline_test_range_overflow_cases); i++) {
+ const char *in = cmdline_test_range_overflow_cases[i].in;
+ const int *e = cmdline_test_range_overflow_cases[i].parsed;
+ /* Two guard elements past the array handed to get_options() */
+ int r[ARRAY_SIZE(cmdline_test_range_overflow_cases[0].parsed) + 2];
+ int n;
+
+ memset(r, 0, sizeof(r));
+ get_options(in, ARRAY_SIZE(r) - 2, r);
+ for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(r) - 2; j++)
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, r[j], e[j], "Pattern: %s at %u", in, j);
+ for (; j < ARRAY_SIZE(r); j++)
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, r[j], 0, "Pattern: %s out of bound at %u", in, j);
+
+ get_options(in, 0, &n);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, n, cmdline_test_range_overflow_cases[i].validated,
+ "Pattern: %s (validated)", in);
+ }
+}
+
static void cmdline_test_next_arg_quoted_value(struct kunit *test)
{
char in[] = "foo=\"bar baz\" qux=1";
@@ -203,6 +241,7 @@ static struct kunit_case cmdline_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(cmdline_test_lead_int),
KUNIT_CASE(cmdline_test_tail_int),
KUNIT_CASE(cmdline_test_range),
+ KUNIT_CASE(cmdline_test_range_overflow),
KUNIT_CASE(cmdline_test_next_arg_quoted_value),
KUNIT_CASE(cmdline_test_next_arg_bare_quote_regression),
KUNIT_CASE(cmdline_test_next_arg_mixed_tokens),
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-11-11 3:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-11-07 10:53 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] lib/cmdline: fix get_options() count and overflow with large ranges" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree Sasha Levin
2026-11-11 3:26 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 1/2] lib/tests: extend cmdline KUnit with next_arg() tests Sasha Levin
2026-11-11 3:26 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 2/2] lib/cmdline: fix get_options() count and overflow with large ranges Sasha Levin
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.