* [scarthgap] Recipe systemd version was changed #scarthgap
@ 2025-06-13 13:22 Savvas Etairidis
2025-06-13 13:32 ` [OE-core] " Marko, Peter
2025-06-14 18:06 ` Guðni Már Gilbert
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Savvas Etairidis @ 2025-06-13 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 339 bytes --]
Hi all,
we noticed that the systemd recipe in the scarthgap brach was renamed from systemd_255.18.bb to systemd_v255.21.bb was this indetional?
The reanme adds a v before the version number. This change has influence on the CVE task we have running.
Should I create a commit to revert this name change?
Thanks in advance,
Savvas
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 439 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [OE-core] [scarthgap] Recipe systemd version was changed #scarthgap
2025-06-13 13:22 [scarthgap] Recipe systemd version was changed #scarthgap Savvas Etairidis
@ 2025-06-13 13:32 ` Marko, Peter
2025-06-14 18:06 ` Guðni Már Gilbert
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marko, Peter @ 2025-06-13 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: setairidis@gmail.com, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Yes, that needs to be corrected from _v255.21 to _255.21.
Autobuilder jobs will have problem with "version-going-backwards" warning/error since the "v" was already merged,
I guess bumping PE to "2" will do the job.
Peter
> -----Original Message-----
> From: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org <openembedded-
> core@lists.openembedded.org> On Behalf Of Savvas Etairidis via
> lists.openembedded.org
> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2025 15:23
> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: [OE-core] [scarthgap] Recipe systemd version was changed #scarthgap
>
> Hi all,
>
> we noticed that the systemd recipe in the scarthgap brach was renamed from
> systemd_255.18.bb to systemd_v255.21.bb was this indetional?
> The reanme adds a v before the version number. This change has influence on the
> CVE task we have running.
> Should I create a commit to revert this name change?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Savvas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [scarthgap] Recipe systemd version was changed #scarthgap
2025-06-13 13:22 [scarthgap] Recipe systemd version was changed #scarthgap Savvas Etairidis
2025-06-13 13:32 ` [OE-core] " Marko, Peter
@ 2025-06-14 18:06 ` Guðni Már Gilbert
2025-06-14 20:28 ` Savvas Etairidis
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Guðni Már Gilbert @ 2025-06-14 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 131 bytes --]
Thanks for spotting this. Problem came from me :( I used “v255.21” when upgrading with devtool and didn’t spot this change.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 154 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [scarthgap] Recipe systemd version was changed #scarthgap
2025-06-14 18:06 ` Guðni Már Gilbert
@ 2025-06-14 20:28 ` Savvas Etairidis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Savvas Etairidis @ 2025-06-14 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 30 bytes --]
I added a patch to fix this.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 41 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-06-14 20:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-06-13 13:22 [scarthgap] Recipe systemd version was changed #scarthgap Savvas Etairidis
2025-06-13 13:32 ` [OE-core] " Marko, Peter
2025-06-14 18:06 ` Guðni Már Gilbert
2025-06-14 20:28 ` Savvas Etairidis
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.