From: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org,
Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 10/15] batman-adv: tt: extract marking of a removed local entry
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2026 19:26:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2056796.PYKUYFuaPT@sven-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907081824.2474040-11-sw@simonwunderlich.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2271 bytes --]
https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260907081824.2474040-1-sw%40simonwunderlich.de?part=10
[...]
> Discovered by: opus-5, old-prompts · Missed by: gpt-5-6-sol, sashiko-gemini
>
> Two comments in batadv_tt_local_remove() look like they no longer match the
> code after the move.
>
> First, the untouched comment further down in batadv_tt_local_remove() still
> refers to a check "above":
>
> net/batman-adv/translation-table.c:batadv_tt_local_remove() {
> ...
> /* batadv_tt_local_transition_new() may have committed the entry and
> * thus counted it in the local table size since the BATADV_TT_CLIENT_NEW
> * check above.
> */
> if (!(batadv_tt_flags_get(&tt_local_entry->common) & BATADV_TT_CLIENT_NEW))
> batadv_tt_local_size_dec(bat_priv, tt_local_entry->common.vid);
> ...
> }
>
> After this patch there is no BATADV_TT_CLIENT_NEW test left anywhere above
> that point in this function; the only one is now inside the new helper:
>
> net/batman-adv/translation-table.c:batadv_tt_local_mark_removed() {
> ...
> if (!(common->flags & BATADV_TT_CLIENT_NEW)) {
> common->flags |= BATADV_TT_CLIENT_PENDING;
> pending = true;
> }
> ...
> }
>
> Should the wording be updated in this patch to name the helper, so the
> size-accounting race stays traceable from the function it is documented in?
See patch 11 "batman-adv: tt: extract immediate purge of a local entry"
> Second, the retained comment above the "if (roaming)" line still says the
> node "has to mark the local entry as roamed", but the code it now precedes
> only assembles the announcement flag word; the actual
> common->flags |= BATADV_TT_CLIENT_ROAM happens in the
> batadv_tt_local_mark_removed() call two lines below. Would it read better
> moved or reworded so it describes the flag assembly?
>
> No functional change is apparent here: flags is fully computed before the
> call, *curr_flags is written unconditionally inside the guard so curr_flags
> is always initialized for the caller, and the helper is only reached after
> the !tt_local_entry early goto.
See https://patchwork.open-mesh.org/project/b.a.t.m.a.n./patch/20260908-sashiko-kdoc-v1-2-535b498f2519@narfation.org/
Regards,
Sven
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 8:18 [PATCH net-next 00/15] pull request for net-next: batman-adv 2026-09-07 Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 01/15] batman-adv: tt: look up wifi state of incoming interface in helper Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-11 1:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 02/15] batman-adv: tt: extract allocation of new local entries Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 03/15] batman-adv: tt: replace forward gotos in batadv_tt_local_add() Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 04/15] batman-adv: tt: extract refresh of existing local entries Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 05/15] batman-adv: tt: extract update of dynamic client flags Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 06/15] batman-adv: tt: extract allocation of new global entries Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 07/15] batman-adv: tt: extract merging of flags into existing " Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 08/15] batman-adv: tt: replace add_orig_entry goto in batadv_tt_global_add() Simon Wunderlich
[not found] ` <20260908082701.B6CCD1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-09-08 9:22 ` Sven Eckelmann
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 09/15] batman-adv: tt: extract removal of the superseded local entry Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-08 17:26 ` Sven Eckelmann
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 10/15] batman-adv: tt: extract marking of a removed " Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-08 17:26 ` Sven Eckelmann [this message]
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 11/15] batman-adv: tt: extract immediate purge of a " Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-08 17:26 ` Sven Eckelmann
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 12/15] batman-adv: tt: drop the cleanup label from batadv_tt_local_remove() Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 13/15] batman-adv: tt: clarify kernel doc for batadv_tt_local_set_pending_event() Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 14/15] batman-adv: bat_iv: fix ogm_neigh_is_sob parameters references Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 15/15] batman-adv: correct batadv_hash_remove kdoc return type Simon Wunderlich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2056796.PYKUYFuaPT@sven-desktop \
--to=sven@narfation.org \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sw@simonwunderlich.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.