From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
akpm@osdl.org, evil@g-house.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] AFS: Manage AFS modularity vs FS-Cache modularity
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:17:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20773.1158934671@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060922123105.GA3767@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Jörn Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> wrote:
> At least I cannot see why the AFS patch differs from the NFS one in
> those two details.
Actually, what the patch itself changes doesn't differ significantly - the
difference is in the patch context.
> > bool "Provide AFS client caching support"
> (EXPERIMENTAL) ?
Well, AFS_FS is itself marked as being experimental, so I'm not sure that the
AFS_FSCACHE option needs to be also.
David
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
akpm@osdl.org, evil@g-house.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] AFS: Manage AFS modularity vs FS-Cache modularity
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:17:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20773.1158934671@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060922123105.GA3767@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Jörn Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> wrote:
> At least I cannot see why the AFS patch differs from the NFS one in
> those two details.
Actually, what the patch itself changes doesn't differ significantly - the
difference is in the patch context.
> > bool "Provide AFS client caching support"
> (EXPERIMENTAL) ?
Well, AFS_FS is itself marked as being experimental, so I'm not sure that the
AFS_FSCACHE option needs to be also.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-22 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-22 11:11 [PATCH 1/2] NFS: Manage NFS modularity vs FS-Cache modularity David Howells
2006-09-22 11:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] AFS: Manage AFS " David Howells
2006-09-22 12:31 ` Jörn Engel
2006-09-22 14:17 ` David Howells [this message]
2006-09-22 14:17 ` David Howells
2006-09-22 14:25 ` Jörn Engel
2006-09-22 14:25 ` Jörn Engel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20773.1158934671@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=evil@g-house.de \
--cc=joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.