From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Frank Wang <frawang.cn@gmail.com>,
vkoul@kernel.org, kishon@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
william.wu@rock-chips.com, tim.chen@rock-chips.com,
frank.wang@rock-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip,inno-usb2phy: add rk3576
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 10:02:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20816071.Yz81rIOvuz@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4b98196a-c898-4d08-9101-31feb4e59b5c@kernel.org>
Hi Krzysztof,
Am Freitag, 27. September 2024, 09:30:30 CEST schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On 27/09/2024 09:01, Frank Wang wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > On 2024/9/26 22:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 26/09/2024 12:32, Frank Wang wrote:
> >>> + - if:
> >>> + properties:
> >>> + compatible:
> >>> + contains:
> >>> + enum:
> >>> + - rockchip,rk3576-usb2phy
> >>> + then:
> >>> + properties:
> >>> + clocks:
> >>> + minItems: 3
> >>> + maxItems: 3
> >> Read one more time the example I gave you. Top-level constraints are
> >> saying max one clock.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Krzysztof
> >>
> >
> > Sorry for overlooking this, I will set both "clocks" and "clock-names"
> > to true, and add the else case below the above codes for the "old" SoCs.
> > Just like the below.
> >
> > - clocks:
> > - maxItems: 1
> > + clocks: true
> >
> > - clock-names:
> > - const: phyclk
> > + clock-names: true
>
> For the third time, read the code I gave you. Do you see something like
> this there? Why doing all the time something different than existing code?
On vacation right now so late to the party, and somewhat confused :-) .
I've tried to find the code you mentioned, but did fail.
In [0] you mention "maybe oneOf". The other replies in that version were
about the ordering needing to stay for the older phy variants.
[1] in v2 has that NAK thing and [2] from v3 references that example again
I am probably just blind, but could use a pointer.
Because I think going with a
- if:
properties:
compatible:
contains:
enum:
- rockchip,rk3576-usb2phy
then:
properties:
clocks:
minItems: 3
maxItems: 3
clock-names:
items:
- const: phyclk
- const: aclk
- const: aclk_slv
else:
properties:
clocks:
maxItems: 1
clock-names:
const: phyclk
block should actually make sure each variant will check for the appropriate
number of clocks?
And having clocks:true in the main part then makes sure that the property
is not getting marked as:
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3576-armsom-sige5.dtb: usb2-phy@0: 'clock-names', 'clocks' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/rockchip,inno-usb2phy.yaml#
Heiko
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/snccizbw6thn3lhwad4xppp7vqii4p56ttl2gufwc3ke7vfckf@e4b7nvwwtdfr/
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2a4200ac-3ea2-4449-94ac-c4b9f37ad800@kernel.org/#t
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ed829240-d4f7-471f-84f6-3509f87f11a1@kernel.org/
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Frank Wang <frawang.cn@gmail.com>,
vkoul@kernel.org, kishon@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
william.wu@rock-chips.com, tim.chen@rock-chips.com,
frank.wang@rock-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip,inno-usb2phy: add rk3576
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 10:02:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20816071.Yz81rIOvuz@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4b98196a-c898-4d08-9101-31feb4e59b5c@kernel.org>
Hi Krzysztof,
Am Freitag, 27. September 2024, 09:30:30 CEST schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On 27/09/2024 09:01, Frank Wang wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > On 2024/9/26 22:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 26/09/2024 12:32, Frank Wang wrote:
> >>> + - if:
> >>> + properties:
> >>> + compatible:
> >>> + contains:
> >>> + enum:
> >>> + - rockchip,rk3576-usb2phy
> >>> + then:
> >>> + properties:
> >>> + clocks:
> >>> + minItems: 3
> >>> + maxItems: 3
> >> Read one more time the example I gave you. Top-level constraints are
> >> saying max one clock.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Krzysztof
> >>
> >
> > Sorry for overlooking this, I will set both "clocks" and "clock-names"
> > to true, and add the else case below the above codes for the "old" SoCs.
> > Just like the below.
> >
> > - clocks:
> > - maxItems: 1
> > + clocks: true
> >
> > - clock-names:
> > - const: phyclk
> > + clock-names: true
>
> For the third time, read the code I gave you. Do you see something like
> this there? Why doing all the time something different than existing code?
On vacation right now so late to the party, and somewhat confused :-) .
I've tried to find the code you mentioned, but did fail.
In [0] you mention "maybe oneOf". The other replies in that version were
about the ordering needing to stay for the older phy variants.
[1] in v2 has that NAK thing and [2] from v3 references that example again
I am probably just blind, but could use a pointer.
Because I think going with a
- if:
properties:
compatible:
contains:
enum:
- rockchip,rk3576-usb2phy
then:
properties:
clocks:
minItems: 3
maxItems: 3
clock-names:
items:
- const: phyclk
- const: aclk
- const: aclk_slv
else:
properties:
clocks:
maxItems: 1
clock-names:
const: phyclk
block should actually make sure each variant will check for the appropriate
number of clocks?
And having clocks:true in the main part then makes sure that the property
is not getting marked as:
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3576-armsom-sige5.dtb: usb2-phy@0: 'clock-names', 'clocks' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/rockchip,inno-usb2phy.yaml#
Heiko
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/snccizbw6thn3lhwad4xppp7vqii4p56ttl2gufwc3ke7vfckf@e4b7nvwwtdfr/
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2a4200ac-3ea2-4449-94ac-c4b9f37ad800@kernel.org/#t
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ed829240-d4f7-471f-84f6-3509f87f11a1@kernel.org/
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Frank Wang <frawang.cn@gmail.com>,
vkoul@kernel.org, kishon@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
william.wu@rock-chips.com, tim.chen@rock-chips.com,
frank.wang@rock-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip,inno-usb2phy: add rk3576
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 10:02:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20816071.Yz81rIOvuz@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4b98196a-c898-4d08-9101-31feb4e59b5c@kernel.org>
Hi Krzysztof,
Am Freitag, 27. September 2024, 09:30:30 CEST schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On 27/09/2024 09:01, Frank Wang wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > On 2024/9/26 22:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 26/09/2024 12:32, Frank Wang wrote:
> >>> + - if:
> >>> + properties:
> >>> + compatible:
> >>> + contains:
> >>> + enum:
> >>> + - rockchip,rk3576-usb2phy
> >>> + then:
> >>> + properties:
> >>> + clocks:
> >>> + minItems: 3
> >>> + maxItems: 3
> >> Read one more time the example I gave you. Top-level constraints are
> >> saying max one clock.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Krzysztof
> >>
> >
> > Sorry for overlooking this, I will set both "clocks" and "clock-names"
> > to true, and add the else case below the above codes for the "old" SoCs.
> > Just like the below.
> >
> > - clocks:
> > - maxItems: 1
> > + clocks: true
> >
> > - clock-names:
> > - const: phyclk
> > + clock-names: true
>
> For the third time, read the code I gave you. Do you see something like
> this there? Why doing all the time something different than existing code?
On vacation right now so late to the party, and somewhat confused :-) .
I've tried to find the code you mentioned, but did fail.
In [0] you mention "maybe oneOf". The other replies in that version were
about the ordering needing to stay for the older phy variants.
[1] in v2 has that NAK thing and [2] from v3 references that example again
I am probably just blind, but could use a pointer.
Because I think going with a
- if:
properties:
compatible:
contains:
enum:
- rockchip,rk3576-usb2phy
then:
properties:
clocks:
minItems: 3
maxItems: 3
clock-names:
items:
- const: phyclk
- const: aclk
- const: aclk_slv
else:
properties:
clocks:
maxItems: 1
clock-names:
const: phyclk
block should actually make sure each variant will check for the appropriate
number of clocks?
And having clocks:true in the main part then makes sure that the property
is not getting marked as:
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3576-armsom-sige5.dtb: usb2-phy@0: 'clock-names', 'clocks' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/rockchip,inno-usb2phy.yaml#
Heiko
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/snccizbw6thn3lhwad4xppp7vqii4p56ttl2gufwc3ke7vfckf@e4b7nvwwtdfr/
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2a4200ac-3ea2-4449-94ac-c4b9f37ad800@kernel.org/#t
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ed829240-d4f7-471f-84f6-3509f87f11a1@kernel.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-27 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-26 10:32 [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip,inno-usb2phy: add rk3576 Frank Wang
2024-09-26 10:32 ` Frank Wang
2024-09-26 10:32 ` Frank Wang
2024-09-26 10:32 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] phy: rockchip: inno-usb2: Add usb2 phys support for rk3576 Frank Wang
2024-09-26 10:32 ` Frank Wang
2024-09-26 10:32 ` Frank Wang
2024-09-26 10:48 ` Heiko Stuebner
2024-09-26 10:48 ` Heiko Stuebner
2024-09-26 10:48 ` Heiko Stuebner
2024-09-27 6:16 ` Frank Wang
2024-09-27 6:16 ` Frank Wang
2024-09-27 6:16 ` Frank Wang
2024-09-27 7:42 ` Heiko Stuebner
2024-09-27 7:42 ` Heiko Stuebner
2024-09-27 7:42 ` Heiko Stuebner
2024-09-26 14:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip,inno-usb2phy: add rk3576 Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-26 14:19 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-26 14:19 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-27 7:01 ` Frank Wang
2024-09-27 7:01 ` Frank Wang
2024-09-27 7:01 ` Frank Wang
2024-09-27 7:30 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-27 7:30 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-27 7:30 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-27 7:59 ` Frank Wang
2024-09-27 7:59 ` Frank Wang
2024-09-27 7:59 ` Frank Wang
2024-09-27 9:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-27 9:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-27 9:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-27 10:49 ` Frank Wang
2024-09-27 10:49 ` Frank Wang
2024-09-27 10:49 ` Frank Wang
2024-09-27 10:59 ` Frank Wang
2024-09-27 10:59 ` Frank Wang
2024-09-27 10:59 ` Frank Wang
2024-09-27 12:05 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-27 12:05 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-27 12:05 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-27 8:02 ` Heiko Stuebner [this message]
2024-09-27 8:02 ` Heiko Stuebner
2024-09-27 8:02 ` Heiko Stuebner
2024-09-27 9:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-27 9:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-27 9:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20816071.Yz81rIOvuz@phil \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frank.wang@rock-chips.com \
--cc=frawang.cn@gmail.com \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=tim.chen@rock-chips.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=william.wu@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.