Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] testpmd:rework csum forward engine

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]

2014-11-28 10:50, Olivier MATZ:
> Hi Jijiang,
> 
> On 11/27/2014 06:03 PM, Jijiang Liu wrote:
> > @@ -303,7 +305,7 @@ process_outer_cksums(void *outer_l3_hdr, uint16_t outer_ethertype,
> >   * TESTPMD_TX_OFFLOAD_* in ports[tx_port].tx_ol_flags. They control
> >   * wether a checksum must be calculated in software or in hardware. The
> >   * IP, UDP, TCP and SCTP flags always concern the inner layer.  The
> > - * VxLAN flag concerns the outer IP and UDP layer (if packet is
> > + * VxLAN flag concerns the outer IP(if packet is
> >   * recognized as a vxlan packet).
> >   */
> 
> Please reindent the comment properly, taking care of the space before
> the parenthesis.
> 
> Another comment that concerns the whole patchset. It's maybe a question
> for Thomas, but I think that having patches that don't break compilation
> between each other would help when bissecting.
> 
> In this case, I wonder if it's possible to split in something like:
> 
> - change PKT_TX_IPV4 and PKT_TX_IPV6 definition
> - add + rename flags (update them in mbuf + testpmd + i40)
> - rename inner_l{23}, l{23} in l{23}, outer_l{23} (update them in mbuf
>   + testpmd + i40)
> 
> I'm not sure it's feasible, I let Thomas give his mind about this.

Exact, compilation must not be broken between patches.
The proposal from Olivier seems OK.

-- 
Thomas