From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Dariusz Sosnowski <dsosnowski@nvidia.com>
Cc: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>, Suanming Mou <suanmingm@nvidia.com>,
Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>,
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ethdev: fast path async flow API
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 12:07:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2171757.irdbgypaU6@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240131093523.1553028-1-dsosnowski@nvidia.com>
31/01/2024 10:35, Dariusz Sosnowski:
> This patch reworks the async flow API functions called in data path,
> to reduce the overhead during flow operations at the library level.
> Main source of the overhead was indirection and checks done while
> ethdev library was fetching rte_flow_ops from a given driver.
>
> This patch introduces rte_flow_fp_ops struct which holds callbacks
> to driver's implementation of fast path async flow API functions.
> Each driver implementing these functions must populate flow_fp_ops
> field inside rte_eth_dev structure with a reference to
> its own implementation.
> By default, ethdev library provides dummy callbacks with
> implementations returning ENOSYS.
> Such design provides a few assumptions:
>
> - rte_flow_fp_ops struct for given port is always available.
> - Each callback is either:
> - Default provided by library.
> - Set up by driver.
It looks similar to what was done in the commit
c87d435a4d79 ("ethdev: copy fast-path API into separate structure")
right?
Maybe worth to mention in the commit log.
> As a result, no checks for availability of the implementation
> are needed at library level in data path.
> Any library-level validation checks in async flow API are compiled
> if and only if RTE_FLOW_DEBUG macro is defined.
How are we supposed to enable RTE_FLOW_DEBUG?
May it be enabled automatically if other debug option is globally enabled?
One comment on the code style: please compare pointers explicitly with NULL
instead of considering them as boolean.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-05 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-30 18:17 [PATCH] ethdev: fast path async flow API Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-01-31 9:35 ` [PATCH v2] " Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-01-31 13:20 ` Ori Kam
2024-02-05 11:07 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2024-02-05 13:14 ` Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-05 14:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-02-06 17:50 ` Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-06 17:36 ` [PATCH v3] " Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-06 22:21 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-02-07 0:57 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-02-07 9:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-02-07 10:47 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-02-07 10:56 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-02-07 11:54 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-02-07 12:06 ` Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-07 13:31 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2171757.irdbgypaU6@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dsosnowski@nvidia.com \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=orika@nvidia.com \
--cc=suanmingm@nvidia.com \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.