From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Jagan Teki <jagan@edgeble.ai>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Jagan Teki <jagan@edgeble.ai>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add Radxa ROCK 4C+ DSI DT-overlay
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2023 12:07:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2194166.1BCLMh4Saa@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230731200559.635629-1-jagan@edgeble.ai>
Am Montag, 31. Juli 2023, 22:05:57 CEST schrieb Jagan Teki:
> Add DSI pipeline for Radxa ROCK 4C+ board via DT-overlay.
>
> The DSI connector in Radxa ROCK 4C+ board support different
> resolution panels and those compatible is added in another
> DT-overlay.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@edgeble.ai>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile | 1 +
> .../rk3399-rock-4c-plus-mipi-dsi.dtso | 69 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-4c-plus-mipi-dsi.dtso
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> index 1ebbb3e9c2f9..3a4c4cd769eb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-roc-pc.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-roc-pc-plus.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-4c-plus.dtb
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-4c-plus-mipi-dsi.dtbo
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-4se.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4a.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dtb
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-4c-plus-mipi-dsi.dtso b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-4c-plus-mipi-dsi.dtso
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..271717040b6c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-4c-plus-mipi-dsi.dtso
> @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Radxa Computer Co., Ltd.
> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Edgeble AI Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
> + *
> + * DT-overlay for Radxa ROCK 4C+ DSI Connector.
> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +/plugin/;
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h>
> +
> +&{/} {
> + backlight: backlight {
> + compatible = "pwm-backlight";
> + pwms = <&pwm2 0 25000 0>;
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&mipi_dsi {
> + clock-master;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + ports {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + mipi_out: port@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> +
> + mipi_out_panel: endpoint {
> + remote-endpoint = <&mipi_in_panel>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +
> + panel: panel@0 {
> + /* different resolution panels are used, compatibles are in DTO */
then I guess, the panel node should get a disabled here (and the mipi_dsi
should stay disabled at this point) and both should get enabled in the final
dtbo where the compatible lives?
> + reg = <0>;
> + backlight = <&backlight>;
> + vdd-supply = <&lcd_3v3>;
> + vccio-supply = <&vcc_1v8_s0>;
> + reset-gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PC2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&lcd_panel_reset>;
> +
> + port {
> + mipi_in_panel: endpoint {
> + remote-endpoint = <&mipi_out_panel>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&pinctrl {
> + lcd {
> + lcd_panel_reset: lcd-panel-reset {
> + rockchip,pins = <1 RK_PC2 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_up>;
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&pwm2 {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Jagan Teki <jagan@edgeble.ai>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Jagan Teki <jagan@edgeble.ai>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add Radxa ROCK 4C+ DSI DT-overlay
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2023 12:07:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2194166.1BCLMh4Saa@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230731200559.635629-1-jagan@edgeble.ai>
Am Montag, 31. Juli 2023, 22:05:57 CEST schrieb Jagan Teki:
> Add DSI pipeline for Radxa ROCK 4C+ board via DT-overlay.
>
> The DSI connector in Radxa ROCK 4C+ board support different
> resolution panels and those compatible is added in another
> DT-overlay.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@edgeble.ai>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile | 1 +
> .../rk3399-rock-4c-plus-mipi-dsi.dtso | 69 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-4c-plus-mipi-dsi.dtso
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> index 1ebbb3e9c2f9..3a4c4cd769eb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-roc-pc.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-roc-pc-plus.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-4c-plus.dtb
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-4c-plus-mipi-dsi.dtbo
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-4se.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4a.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dtb
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-4c-plus-mipi-dsi.dtso b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-4c-plus-mipi-dsi.dtso
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..271717040b6c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-4c-plus-mipi-dsi.dtso
> @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Radxa Computer Co., Ltd.
> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Edgeble AI Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
> + *
> + * DT-overlay for Radxa ROCK 4C+ DSI Connector.
> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +/plugin/;
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h>
> +
> +&{/} {
> + backlight: backlight {
> + compatible = "pwm-backlight";
> + pwms = <&pwm2 0 25000 0>;
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&mipi_dsi {
> + clock-master;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + ports {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + mipi_out: port@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> +
> + mipi_out_panel: endpoint {
> + remote-endpoint = <&mipi_in_panel>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +
> + panel: panel@0 {
> + /* different resolution panels are used, compatibles are in DTO */
then I guess, the panel node should get a disabled here (and the mipi_dsi
should stay disabled at this point) and both should get enabled in the final
dtbo where the compatible lives?
> + reg = <0>;
> + backlight = <&backlight>;
> + vdd-supply = <&lcd_3v3>;
> + vccio-supply = <&vcc_1v8_s0>;
> + reset-gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PC2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&lcd_panel_reset>;
> +
> + port {
> + mipi_in_panel: endpoint {
> + remote-endpoint = <&mipi_out_panel>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&pinctrl {
> + lcd {
> + lcd_panel_reset: lcd-panel-reset {
> + rockchip,pins = <1 RK_PC2 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_up>;
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&pwm2 {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Jagan Teki <jagan@edgeble.ai>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Jagan Teki <jagan@edgeble.ai>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add Radxa ROCK 4C+ DSI DT-overlay
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2023 12:07:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2194166.1BCLMh4Saa@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230731200559.635629-1-jagan@edgeble.ai>
Am Montag, 31. Juli 2023, 22:05:57 CEST schrieb Jagan Teki:
> Add DSI pipeline for Radxa ROCK 4C+ board via DT-overlay.
>
> The DSI connector in Radxa ROCK 4C+ board support different
> resolution panels and those compatible is added in another
> DT-overlay.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@edgeble.ai>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile | 1 +
> .../rk3399-rock-4c-plus-mipi-dsi.dtso | 69 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-4c-plus-mipi-dsi.dtso
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> index 1ebbb3e9c2f9..3a4c4cd769eb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-roc-pc.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-roc-pc-plus.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-4c-plus.dtb
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-4c-plus-mipi-dsi.dtbo
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-4se.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4a.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4a-plus.dtb
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-4c-plus-mipi-dsi.dtso b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-4c-plus-mipi-dsi.dtso
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..271717040b6c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-4c-plus-mipi-dsi.dtso
> @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Radxa Computer Co., Ltd.
> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Edgeble AI Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
> + *
> + * DT-overlay for Radxa ROCK 4C+ DSI Connector.
> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +/plugin/;
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h>
> +
> +&{/} {
> + backlight: backlight {
> + compatible = "pwm-backlight";
> + pwms = <&pwm2 0 25000 0>;
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&mipi_dsi {
> + clock-master;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + ports {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + mipi_out: port@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> +
> + mipi_out_panel: endpoint {
> + remote-endpoint = <&mipi_in_panel>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +
> + panel: panel@0 {
> + /* different resolution panels are used, compatibles are in DTO */
then I guess, the panel node should get a disabled here (and the mipi_dsi
should stay disabled at this point) and both should get enabled in the final
dtbo where the compatible lives?
> + reg = <0>;
> + backlight = <&backlight>;
> + vdd-supply = <&lcd_3v3>;
> + vccio-supply = <&vcc_1v8_s0>;
> + reset-gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PC2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&lcd_panel_reset>;
> +
> + port {
> + mipi_in_panel: endpoint {
> + remote-endpoint = <&mipi_out_panel>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&pinctrl {
> + lcd {
> + lcd_panel_reset: lcd-panel-reset {
> + rockchip,pins = <1 RK_PC2 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_up>;
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&pwm2 {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-05 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-31 20:05 [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add Radxa ROCK 4C+ DSI DT-overlay Jagan Teki
2023-07-31 20:05 ` Jagan Teki
2023-07-31 20:05 ` Jagan Teki
2023-07-31 20:05 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add Radxa Display 8HD DT-overlay Jagan Teki
2023-07-31 20:05 ` Jagan Teki
2023-07-31 20:05 ` Jagan Teki
2023-07-31 20:05 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add Radxa Display 10HD DT-overlay Jagan Teki
2023-07-31 20:05 ` Jagan Teki
2023-07-31 20:05 ` Jagan Teki
2023-10-05 10:07 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2023-10-05 10:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add Radxa ROCK 4C+ DSI DT-overlay Heiko Stübner
2023-10-05 10:07 ` Heiko Stübner
2023-11-13 15:15 ` Jagan Teki
2023-11-13 15:15 ` Jagan Teki
2023-11-13 15:15 ` Jagan Teki
2024-01-05 12:07 ` Heiko Stübner
2024-01-05 12:07 ` Heiko Stübner
2024-01-05 12:07 ` Heiko Stübner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2194166.1BCLMh4Saa@diego \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jagan@edgeble.ai \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.