From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, kishon@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
quentin.schulz@cherry.de, sebastian.reichel@collabora.com,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dse@thaumatec.com, Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: Add Rockchip MIPI C-/D-PHY schema
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:38:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2213231.Mh6RI2rZIc@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241126-pastrami-gusty-8b9df32ae00c@spud>
Hey Conor,
Am Dienstag, 26. November 2024, 18:44:14 CET schrieb Conor Dooley:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 02:17:34PM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
> >
> > Add dt-binding schema for the MIPI C-/D-PHY found on
> > Rockchip RK3588 SoCs.
> >
> > Tested-by: Daniel Semkowicz <dse@thaumatec.com>
> > Tested-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
> > ---
> > .../phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml | 87 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..c8ff5ba22a86
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Rockchip MIPI D-/C-PHY with Samsung IP block
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Guochun Huang <hero.huang@rock-chips.com>
> > + - Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + enum:
> > + - rockchip,rk3576-mipi-dcphy
> > + - rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy
>
> How many phys do each of these SoCs have?
- rk3588 has two - each with a separate GRF for additional settings [0]
- rk3576 has one
Heiko
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/D5F5C1RWVHG5.TSHPO29TXYEF@cknow.org/T/
The register layout in each GRF area is identical, but each DC-PHY gets
its own separate GRF io-mem block.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, kishon@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
quentin.schulz@cherry.de, sebastian.reichel@collabora.com,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dse@thaumatec.com, Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: Add Rockchip MIPI C-/D-PHY schema
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:38:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2213231.Mh6RI2rZIc@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241126-pastrami-gusty-8b9df32ae00c@spud>
Hey Conor,
Am Dienstag, 26. November 2024, 18:44:14 CET schrieb Conor Dooley:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 02:17:34PM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
> >
> > Add dt-binding schema for the MIPI C-/D-PHY found on
> > Rockchip RK3588 SoCs.
> >
> > Tested-by: Daniel Semkowicz <dse@thaumatec.com>
> > Tested-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
> > ---
> > .../phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml | 87 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..c8ff5ba22a86
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Rockchip MIPI D-/C-PHY with Samsung IP block
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Guochun Huang <hero.huang@rock-chips.com>
> > + - Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + enum:
> > + - rockchip,rk3576-mipi-dcphy
> > + - rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy
>
> How many phys do each of these SoCs have?
- rk3588 has two - each with a separate GRF for additional settings [0]
- rk3576 has one
Heiko
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/D5F5C1RWVHG5.TSHPO29TXYEF@cknow.org/T/
The register layout in each GRF area is identical, but each DC-PHY gets
its own separate GRF io-mem block.
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, kishon@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
quentin.schulz@cherry.de, sebastian.reichel@collabora.com,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dse@thaumatec.com, Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: Add Rockchip MIPI C-/D-PHY schema
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:38:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2213231.Mh6RI2rZIc@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241126-pastrami-gusty-8b9df32ae00c@spud>
Hey Conor,
Am Dienstag, 26. November 2024, 18:44:14 CET schrieb Conor Dooley:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 02:17:34PM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
> >
> > Add dt-binding schema for the MIPI C-/D-PHY found on
> > Rockchip RK3588 SoCs.
> >
> > Tested-by: Daniel Semkowicz <dse@thaumatec.com>
> > Tested-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
> > ---
> > .../phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml | 87 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..c8ff5ba22a86
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Rockchip MIPI D-/C-PHY with Samsung IP block
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Guochun Huang <hero.huang@rock-chips.com>
> > + - Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + enum:
> > + - rockchip,rk3576-mipi-dcphy
> > + - rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy
>
> How many phys do each of these SoCs have?
- rk3588 has two - each with a separate GRF for additional settings [0]
- rk3576 has one
Heiko
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/D5F5C1RWVHG5.TSHPO29TXYEF@cknow.org/T/
The register layout in each GRF area is identical, but each DC-PHY gets
its own separate GRF io-mem block.
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-26 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-26 13:17 [PATCH v4 0/2] MIPI DSI phy for rk3588 Heiko Stuebner
2024-11-26 13:17 ` Heiko Stuebner
2024-11-26 13:17 ` Heiko Stuebner
2024-11-26 13:17 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: Add Rockchip MIPI C-/D-PHY schema Heiko Stuebner
2024-11-26 13:17 ` Heiko Stuebner
2024-11-26 13:17 ` Heiko Stuebner
2024-11-26 16:02 ` Sebastian Reichel
2024-11-26 16:02 ` Sebastian Reichel
2024-11-26 16:02 ` Sebastian Reichel
2024-11-26 17:44 ` Conor Dooley
2024-11-26 17:44 ` Conor Dooley
2024-11-26 17:44 ` Conor Dooley
2024-11-26 18:38 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2024-11-26 18:38 ` Heiko Stübner
2024-11-26 18:38 ` Heiko Stübner
2024-11-27 16:23 ` Conor Dooley
2024-11-27 16:23 ` Conor Dooley
2024-11-27 16:23 ` Conor Dooley
2024-11-26 13:17 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] phy: rockchip: Add Samsung MIPI D-/C-PHY driver Heiko Stuebner
2024-11-26 13:17 ` Heiko Stuebner
2024-11-26 13:17 ` Heiko Stuebner
2024-11-26 16:11 ` Sebastian Reichel
2024-11-26 16:11 ` Sebastian Reichel
2024-11-26 16:11 ` Sebastian Reichel
2024-11-28 9:13 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-28 9:13 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-28 9:13 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2213231.Mh6RI2rZIc@diego \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dse@thaumatec.com \
--cc=heiko.stuebner@cherry.de \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=quentin.schulz@cherry.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.