All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test9-mm2
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 15:07:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <225880000.1068073678@flay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031104225544.0773904f.akpm@osdl.org>

Seems to work fine on my box. Nothing very interesting from a performance
perspective, but it does seem a touch faster than mainline on kernbench.
NFI why ;-)

Kernbench: (make -j N vmlinux, where N = 2 x num_cpus)
                              Elapsed      System        User         CPU
              2.6.0-test9       45.28      100.19      568.01     1474.75
          2.6.0-test9-mm2       44.83      100.79      567.74     1491.00
         2.6.0-test9-mjb1       43.73       80.19      559.91     1463.25

Kernbench: (make -j N vmlinux, where N = 16 x num_cpus)
                              Elapsed      System        User         CPU
              2.6.0-test9       46.17      122.20      571.58     1501.00
          2.6.0-test9-mm2       45.89      120.39      570.67     1504.75
         2.6.0-test9-mjb1       43.52       89.98      562.91     1500.50

Kernbench: (make -j vmlinux, maximal tasks)
                              Elapsed      System        User         CPU
              2.6.0-test9       45.84      120.14      570.93     1507.00
          2.6.0-test9-mm2       44.21      118.81      571.28     1566.00
         2.6.0-test9-mjb1       43.73       87.19      564.39     1488.50


DISCLAIMER: SPEC(tm) and the benchmark name SDET(tm) are registered
trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. This 
benchmarking was performed for research purposes only, and the run results
are non-compliant and not-comparable with any published results.

Results are shown as percentages of the first set displayed

SDET 1  (see disclaimer)
                           Throughput    Std. Dev
              2.6.0-test9       100.0%         1.2%
          2.6.0-test9-mm2        98.3%         2.3%
         2.6.0-test9-mjb1       112.2%         1.8%

SDET 2  (see disclaimer)
                           Throughput    Std. Dev
              2.6.0-test9       100.0%         2.0%
          2.6.0-test9-mm2       103.8%         1.8%
         2.6.0-test9-mjb1       116.4%         0.6%

SDET 4  (see disclaimer)
                           Throughput    Std. Dev
              2.6.0-test9       100.0%         0.9%
          2.6.0-test9-mm2       102.6%         1.0%
         2.6.0-test9-mjb1       120.5%         0.6%

SDET 8  (see disclaimer)
                           Throughput    Std. Dev
              2.6.0-test9       100.0%         0.4%
          2.6.0-test9-mm2        98.9%         0.4%
         2.6.0-test9-mjb1       123.7%         0.2%

SDET 16  (see disclaimer)
                           Throughput    Std. Dev
              2.6.0-test9       100.0%         0.8%
          2.6.0-test9-mm2       100.6%         0.9%
         2.6.0-test9-mjb1       127.6%         0.0%

SDET 32  (see disclaimer)
                           Throughput    Std. Dev
              2.6.0-test9       100.0%         0.3%
          2.6.0-test9-mm2        99.8%         0.3%
         2.6.0-test9-mjb1       125.9%         0.5%

SDET 64  (see disclaimer)
                           Throughput    Std. Dev
              2.6.0-test9       100.0%         0.4%
          2.6.0-test9-mm2        99.7%         0.4%
         2.6.0-test9-mjb1       127.6%         0.9%

SDET 128  (see disclaimer)
                           Throughput    Std. Dev
              2.6.0-test9       100.0%         0.1%
          2.6.0-test9-mm2        99.0%         0.3%
         2.6.0-test9-mjb1       127.7%         0.2%


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test9-mm2
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 15:07:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <225880000.1068073678@flay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031104225544.0773904f.akpm@osdl.org>

Seems to work fine on my box. Nothing very interesting from a performance
perspective, but it does seem a touch faster than mainline on kernbench.
NFI why ;-)

Kernbench: (make -j N vmlinux, where N = 2 x num_cpus)
                              Elapsed      System        User         CPU
              2.6.0-test9       45.28      100.19      568.01     1474.75
          2.6.0-test9-mm2       44.83      100.79      567.74     1491.00
         2.6.0-test9-mjb1       43.73       80.19      559.91     1463.25

Kernbench: (make -j N vmlinux, where N = 16 x num_cpus)
                              Elapsed      System        User         CPU
              2.6.0-test9       46.17      122.20      571.58     1501.00
          2.6.0-test9-mm2       45.89      120.39      570.67     1504.75
         2.6.0-test9-mjb1       43.52       89.98      562.91     1500.50

Kernbench: (make -j vmlinux, maximal tasks)
                              Elapsed      System        User         CPU
              2.6.0-test9       45.84      120.14      570.93     1507.00
          2.6.0-test9-mm2       44.21      118.81      571.28     1566.00
         2.6.0-test9-mjb1       43.73       87.19      564.39     1488.50


DISCLAIMER: SPEC(tm) and the benchmark name SDET(tm) are registered
trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. This 
benchmarking was performed for research purposes only, and the run results
are non-compliant and not-comparable with any published results.

Results are shown as percentages of the first set displayed

SDET 1  (see disclaimer)
                           Throughput    Std. Dev
              2.6.0-test9       100.0%         1.2%
          2.6.0-test9-mm2        98.3%         2.3%
         2.6.0-test9-mjb1       112.2%         1.8%

SDET 2  (see disclaimer)
                           Throughput    Std. Dev
              2.6.0-test9       100.0%         2.0%
          2.6.0-test9-mm2       103.8%         1.8%
         2.6.0-test9-mjb1       116.4%         0.6%

SDET 4  (see disclaimer)
                           Throughput    Std. Dev
              2.6.0-test9       100.0%         0.9%
          2.6.0-test9-mm2       102.6%         1.0%
         2.6.0-test9-mjb1       120.5%         0.6%

SDET 8  (see disclaimer)
                           Throughput    Std. Dev
              2.6.0-test9       100.0%         0.4%
          2.6.0-test9-mm2        98.9%         0.4%
         2.6.0-test9-mjb1       123.7%         0.2%

SDET 16  (see disclaimer)
                           Throughput    Std. Dev
              2.6.0-test9       100.0%         0.8%
          2.6.0-test9-mm2       100.6%         0.9%
         2.6.0-test9-mjb1       127.6%         0.0%

SDET 32  (see disclaimer)
                           Throughput    Std. Dev
              2.6.0-test9       100.0%         0.3%
          2.6.0-test9-mm2        99.8%         0.3%
         2.6.0-test9-mjb1       125.9%         0.5%

SDET 64  (see disclaimer)
                           Throughput    Std. Dev
              2.6.0-test9       100.0%         0.4%
          2.6.0-test9-mm2        99.7%         0.4%
         2.6.0-test9-mjb1       127.6%         0.9%

SDET 128  (see disclaimer)
                           Throughput    Std. Dev
              2.6.0-test9       100.0%         0.1%
          2.6.0-test9-mm2        99.0%         0.3%
         2.6.0-test9-mjb1       127.7%         0.2%

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-11-05 23:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-05  6:55 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-11-05  6:55 ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-11-05 12:30 ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-11-05 12:30   ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-11-05 16:10 ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 (compile stats) John Cherry
2003-11-05 16:10   ` John Cherry
2003-11-05 17:02 ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Alistair John Strachan
2003-11-05 17:02   ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Alistair John Strachan
2003-11-05 23:07 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2003-11-05 23:07   ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2003-11-10 23:06 ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 - AIO tests still gets slab corruption Daniel McNeil
2003-11-10 23:06   ` Daniel McNeil
2003-11-10 23:42   ` Andrew Morton
2003-11-10 23:42     ` Andrew Morton
2003-11-11 15:02     ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-11-11 15:02       ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-11-12 20:10       ` Daniel McNeil
2003-11-12 20:10         ` Daniel McNeil
2003-11-13 11:29         ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-11-13 11:29           ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-11-11 18:01     ` [PATCH 2.6.0-test9] AIO-ref-count.patch Daniel McNeil
2003-11-11 17:25 ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Daniel Drake
2003-11-11 17:25   ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Daniel Drake
2003-11-12  1:18   ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Nick Piggin
2003-11-12  1:18     ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Nick Piggin
2003-11-12  3:45     ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Mike Fedyk
2003-11-12  3:45       ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Mike Fedyk
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-05 19:49 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Bradley Chapman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=225880000.1068073678@flay \
    --to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.