From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test9-mm2
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 15:07:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <225880000.1068073678@flay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031104225544.0773904f.akpm@osdl.org>
Seems to work fine on my box. Nothing very interesting from a performance
perspective, but it does seem a touch faster than mainline on kernbench.
NFI why ;-)
Kernbench: (make -j N vmlinux, where N = 2 x num_cpus)
Elapsed System User CPU
2.6.0-test9 45.28 100.19 568.01 1474.75
2.6.0-test9-mm2 44.83 100.79 567.74 1491.00
2.6.0-test9-mjb1 43.73 80.19 559.91 1463.25
Kernbench: (make -j N vmlinux, where N = 16 x num_cpus)
Elapsed System User CPU
2.6.0-test9 46.17 122.20 571.58 1501.00
2.6.0-test9-mm2 45.89 120.39 570.67 1504.75
2.6.0-test9-mjb1 43.52 89.98 562.91 1500.50
Kernbench: (make -j vmlinux, maximal tasks)
Elapsed System User CPU
2.6.0-test9 45.84 120.14 570.93 1507.00
2.6.0-test9-mm2 44.21 118.81 571.28 1566.00
2.6.0-test9-mjb1 43.73 87.19 564.39 1488.50
DISCLAIMER: SPEC(tm) and the benchmark name SDET(tm) are registered
trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. This
benchmarking was performed for research purposes only, and the run results
are non-compliant and not-comparable with any published results.
Results are shown as percentages of the first set displayed
SDET 1 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.6.0-test9 100.0% 1.2%
2.6.0-test9-mm2 98.3% 2.3%
2.6.0-test9-mjb1 112.2% 1.8%
SDET 2 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.6.0-test9 100.0% 2.0%
2.6.0-test9-mm2 103.8% 1.8%
2.6.0-test9-mjb1 116.4% 0.6%
SDET 4 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.6.0-test9 100.0% 0.9%
2.6.0-test9-mm2 102.6% 1.0%
2.6.0-test9-mjb1 120.5% 0.6%
SDET 8 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.6.0-test9 100.0% 0.4%
2.6.0-test9-mm2 98.9% 0.4%
2.6.0-test9-mjb1 123.7% 0.2%
SDET 16 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.6.0-test9 100.0% 0.8%
2.6.0-test9-mm2 100.6% 0.9%
2.6.0-test9-mjb1 127.6% 0.0%
SDET 32 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.6.0-test9 100.0% 0.3%
2.6.0-test9-mm2 99.8% 0.3%
2.6.0-test9-mjb1 125.9% 0.5%
SDET 64 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.6.0-test9 100.0% 0.4%
2.6.0-test9-mm2 99.7% 0.4%
2.6.0-test9-mjb1 127.6% 0.9%
SDET 128 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.6.0-test9 100.0% 0.1%
2.6.0-test9-mm2 99.0% 0.3%
2.6.0-test9-mjb1 127.7% 0.2%
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test9-mm2
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 15:07:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <225880000.1068073678@flay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031104225544.0773904f.akpm@osdl.org>
Seems to work fine on my box. Nothing very interesting from a performance
perspective, but it does seem a touch faster than mainline on kernbench.
NFI why ;-)
Kernbench: (make -j N vmlinux, where N = 2 x num_cpus)
Elapsed System User CPU
2.6.0-test9 45.28 100.19 568.01 1474.75
2.6.0-test9-mm2 44.83 100.79 567.74 1491.00
2.6.0-test9-mjb1 43.73 80.19 559.91 1463.25
Kernbench: (make -j N vmlinux, where N = 16 x num_cpus)
Elapsed System User CPU
2.6.0-test9 46.17 122.20 571.58 1501.00
2.6.0-test9-mm2 45.89 120.39 570.67 1504.75
2.6.0-test9-mjb1 43.52 89.98 562.91 1500.50
Kernbench: (make -j vmlinux, maximal tasks)
Elapsed System User CPU
2.6.0-test9 45.84 120.14 570.93 1507.00
2.6.0-test9-mm2 44.21 118.81 571.28 1566.00
2.6.0-test9-mjb1 43.73 87.19 564.39 1488.50
DISCLAIMER: SPEC(tm) and the benchmark name SDET(tm) are registered
trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. This
benchmarking was performed for research purposes only, and the run results
are non-compliant and not-comparable with any published results.
Results are shown as percentages of the first set displayed
SDET 1 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.6.0-test9 100.0% 1.2%
2.6.0-test9-mm2 98.3% 2.3%
2.6.0-test9-mjb1 112.2% 1.8%
SDET 2 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.6.0-test9 100.0% 2.0%
2.6.0-test9-mm2 103.8% 1.8%
2.6.0-test9-mjb1 116.4% 0.6%
SDET 4 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.6.0-test9 100.0% 0.9%
2.6.0-test9-mm2 102.6% 1.0%
2.6.0-test9-mjb1 120.5% 0.6%
SDET 8 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.6.0-test9 100.0% 0.4%
2.6.0-test9-mm2 98.9% 0.4%
2.6.0-test9-mjb1 123.7% 0.2%
SDET 16 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.6.0-test9 100.0% 0.8%
2.6.0-test9-mm2 100.6% 0.9%
2.6.0-test9-mjb1 127.6% 0.0%
SDET 32 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.6.0-test9 100.0% 0.3%
2.6.0-test9-mm2 99.8% 0.3%
2.6.0-test9-mjb1 125.9% 0.5%
SDET 64 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.6.0-test9 100.0% 0.4%
2.6.0-test9-mm2 99.7% 0.4%
2.6.0-test9-mjb1 127.6% 0.9%
SDET 128 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.6.0-test9 100.0% 0.1%
2.6.0-test9-mm2 99.0% 0.3%
2.6.0-test9-mjb1 127.7% 0.2%
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-05 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-05 6:55 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-11-05 6:55 ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-11-05 12:30 ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-11-05 12:30 ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-11-05 16:10 ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 (compile stats) John Cherry
2003-11-05 16:10 ` John Cherry
2003-11-05 17:02 ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Alistair John Strachan
2003-11-05 17:02 ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Alistair John Strachan
2003-11-05 23:07 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2003-11-05 23:07 ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2003-11-10 23:06 ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 - AIO tests still gets slab corruption Daniel McNeil
2003-11-10 23:06 ` Daniel McNeil
2003-11-10 23:42 ` Andrew Morton
2003-11-10 23:42 ` Andrew Morton
2003-11-11 15:02 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-11-11 15:02 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-11-12 20:10 ` Daniel McNeil
2003-11-12 20:10 ` Daniel McNeil
2003-11-13 11:29 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-11-13 11:29 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-11-11 18:01 ` [PATCH 2.6.0-test9] AIO-ref-count.patch Daniel McNeil
2003-11-11 17:25 ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Daniel Drake
2003-11-11 17:25 ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Daniel Drake
2003-11-12 1:18 ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Nick Piggin
2003-11-12 1:18 ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Nick Piggin
2003-11-12 3:45 ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Mike Fedyk
2003-11-12 3:45 ` 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Mike Fedyk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-05 19:49 2.6.0-test9-mm2 Bradley Chapman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=225880000.1068073678@flay \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.