All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Nanzhe Zhao <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Juan Yescas <jyescas@google.com>,
	Dev Jain <Dev.Jain@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Hildenbrand <David.Hildenbrand@arm.com>,
	Bo Zhang <zhangbo56@xiaomi.com>,
	Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
	Nanzhe Zhao <nzzhao@126.com>, Pengfei Li <lipengfei28@xiaomi.com>,
	Ryan Roberts <Ryan.Roberts@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 01/14] f2fs: extend folio state for large folio write path
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 14:57:52 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <22b18f2e-70f5-4292-b83e-8f6c374a627d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260826082641.2007658-2-zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>

On 8/26/26 16:26, Nanzhe Zhao wrote:
> Large folio write path needs a subpage status bitmap and write
> pages pending counter, while keeping compatible with f2fs private
> flags.
> 
> Move struct f2fs_folio_state to f2fs.h, add private_flags and
> subpage state bitmap, and change PAGE_PRIVATE functions to be
> compatible with f2fs_folio_state. Allocate f2fs_folio_state via kzalloc
> instead of kmem_cache, since the state size depends on the folio order.
> 
> Note: Now if a path wants to use f2fs_folio_state, it must call
> `folio_has_ffs` instead of `folio_test_large`` to make check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nanzhe Zhao <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/compress.c |  2 +
>  fs/f2fs/data.c     | 60 ++++++++++++++++--------------
>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h     | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  fs/f2fs/segment.c  |  2 +-
>  4 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/compress.c b/fs/f2fs/compress.c
> index 91855d91bbdd..84da3e39efb4 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/compress.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/compress.c
> @@ -78,6 +78,8 @@ bool f2fs_is_compressed_page(struct folio *folio)
>  		return false;
>  	if (folio_test_f2fs_nonpointer(folio))
>  		return false;
> +	if (f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio))
> +		return false;

Shouldn't this be changed in "f2fs: make compressed files compatible with
large folio" or other patch? I guess in this patch we only introduce new
ffs facilities.

>  
>  	f2fs_bug_on(F2FS_F_SB(folio),
>  		*((u32 *)folio->private) != F2FS_COMPRESSED_PAGE_MAGIC);
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index 6ae0eb37d20f..578a90d427e2 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -32,20 +32,13 @@
>  
>  static struct kmem_cache *bio_post_read_ctx_cache;
>  static struct kmem_cache *bio_entry_slab;
> -static struct kmem_cache *ffs_entry_slab;
>  static mempool_t *bio_post_read_ctx_pool;
>  static struct bio_set f2fs_bioset;
>  
> -struct f2fs_folio_state {
> -	spinlock_t		state_lock;
> -	unsigned int		read_pages_pending;
> -};
> -
>  struct f2fs_bio {
>  	struct work_struct work;
>  	struct bio bio;
>  };
> -

Unnecessary change.

>  #define	F2FS_BIO_POOL_SIZE	NR_CURSEG_TYPE
>  
>  int __init f2fs_init_bioset(void)
> @@ -133,6 +126,9 @@ struct bio_post_read_ctx {
>  	block_t fs_blkaddr;
>  };
>  
> +static bool __ffs_mark_subrange_uptodate(struct folio *folio,
> +		struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs, size_t offset, size_t len);
> +
>  /*
>   * Update and unlock a bio's pages, and free the bio.
>   *
> @@ -155,7 +151,7 @@ static void f2fs_finish_read_bio(struct bio *bio, bool in_task)
>  
>  	bio_for_each_folio_all(fi, bio) {
>  		struct folio *folio = fi.folio;
> -		unsigned nr_pages = fi.length >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +		unsigned int nr_pages = fi.length >> PAGE_SHIFT;

No need to change in this patch?

>  		bool finished = true;
>  
>  		if (!folio_test_large(folio) &&
> @@ -360,6 +356,7 @@ static void f2fs_write_end_bio(struct bio *bio)
>  
>  	bio_for_each_folio_all(fi, bio) {
>  		struct folio *folio = fi.folio;
> +		unsigned int nr_pages = fi.length >> PAGE_SHIFT;

No need to change in this patch?

>  		enum count_type type;
>  
>  		if (fscrypt_is_bounce_folio(folio)) {
> @@ -2516,17 +2513,32 @@ int f2fs_read_multi_pages(struct compress_ctx *cc, struct bio **bio_ret,
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> -static struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs_find_or_alloc(struct folio *folio)
> +struct f2fs_folio_state *f2fs_ffs_find_or_alloc(struct folio *folio)
>  {
> -	struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs = folio->private;
> +	struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs;
> +	unsigned int nr_subpages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> +	unsigned long private_flags = 0;
> +
> +	f2fs_bug_on(F2FS_F_SB(folio), !folio_test_large(folio));
>  
> -	if (ffs)
> -		return ffs;
> +	if (f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio))
> +		return (struct f2fs_folio_state *)folio->private;
>  
> -	ffs = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(ffs_entry_slab,
> -			GFP_NOIO | __GFP_ZERO, true, NULL);
> +	if (folio_test_private(folio) && folio_test_f2fs_nonpointer(folio))
> +		private_flags = (unsigned long)folio->private;
> +
> +	ffs = kzalloc(struct_size(ffs, state, BITS_TO_LONGS(2 * nr_subpages)),
> +			GFP_NOIO | __GFP_NOFAIL);
>  
>  	spin_lock_init(&ffs->state_lock);
> +	ffs->private_flags = private_flags;
> +	if (folio_test_uptodate(folio))
> +		bitmap_set(ffs->state, 0, nr_subpages);
> +	if (folio_test_dirty(folio))
> +		bitmap_set(ffs->state, nr_subpages, nr_subpages);
> +
> +	if (folio_test_private(folio))
> +		folio_detach_private(folio);
>  	folio_attach_private(folio, ffs);
>  	return ffs;
>  }
> @@ -2535,7 +2547,7 @@ static void ffs_detach_free(struct folio *folio)
>  {
>  	struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs;
>  
> -	if (!folio_test_large(folio)) {
> +	if (!f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio)) {
>  		folio_detach_private(folio);
>  		return;
>  	}
> @@ -2545,7 +2557,8 @@ static void ffs_detach_free(struct folio *folio)
>  		return;
>  
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(ffs->read_pages_pending != 0);
> -	kmem_cache_free(ffs_entry_slab, ffs);
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&ffs->write_pages_pending));
> +	kfree(ffs);
>  }
>  
>  static int f2fs_read_data_large_folio(struct inode *inode,
> @@ -2558,7 +2571,7 @@ static int f2fs_read_data_large_folio(struct inode *inode,
>  	pgoff_t index, offset, next_pgofs = 0;
>  	unsigned max_nr_pages = rac ? readahead_count(rac) :
>  				folio_nr_pages(folio);
> -	unsigned nrpages;
> +	unsigned int nrpages, len_blks;
>  	struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  	bool folio_in_bio = false;
> @@ -2634,7 +2647,7 @@ static int f2fs_read_data_large_folio(struct inode *inode,
>  		 * to prevent from premature folio_end_read() call on folio
>  		 */
>  		if (folio_test_large(folio)) {
> -			ffs = ffs_find_or_alloc(folio);
> +			ffs = f2fs_ffs_find_or_alloc(folio);
>  
>  			/* set the bitmap to wait */
>  			spin_lock_irq(&ffs->state_lock);
> @@ -2987,7 +3000,7 @@ bool f2fs_should_update_outplace(struct inode *inode, struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  		return true;
>  
>  	if (fio) {
> -		if (page_private_gcing(fio->page))
> +		if (folio_test_f2fs_gcing(fio->folio))

Shouldn't this be changed in "f2fs: make GC migration large-folio aware"?

>  			return true;
>  		if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED) &&
>  			f2fs_is_checkpointed_data(sbi, fio->old_blkaddr)))
> @@ -4586,21 +4599,12 @@ int __init f2fs_init_bio_entry_cache(void)
>  	if (!bio_entry_slab)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	ffs_entry_slab = f2fs_kmem_cache_create("f2fs_ffs_slab",
> -			sizeof(struct f2fs_folio_state));
> -
> -	if (!ffs_entry_slab) {
> -		kmem_cache_destroy(bio_entry_slab);
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -	}
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  void f2fs_destroy_bio_entry_cache(void)
>  {
>  	kmem_cache_destroy(bio_entry_slab);
> -	kmem_cache_destroy(ffs_entry_slab);
>  }
>  
>  static int f2fs_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length,
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index 16720f1f0a9c..2e8f85cea6d0 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -1628,6 +1628,18 @@ static inline void f2fs_clear_bit(unsigned int nr, char *addr);
>   * Layout B: lowest bit should be 0
>   * page.private is a wrapped pointer.
>   */
> +
> +struct f2fs_folio_state {
> +	spinlock_t		state_lock;
> +	unsigned int		read_pages_pending;
> +	atomic_t		write_pages_pending;
> +	unsigned long		private_flags;
> +	/* state[0..nr_subpages - 1] tracks uptodate subpages.
> +	 * state[nr_subpages..2 * nr_subpages - 1] tracks dirty subpages.
> +	 */
> +	unsigned long		state[];
> +};
> +
>  enum {
>  	PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER,		/* private contains non-pointer data */
>  	PAGE_PRIVATE_ONGOING_MIGRATION,		/* data page which is on-going migrating */
> @@ -1637,6 +1649,14 @@ enum {
>  	PAGE_PRIVATE_MAX
>  };
>  
> +static inline bool f2fs_folio_has_ffs(const struct folio *folio)
> +{
> +	unsigned long private = (unsigned long)folio->private;
> +
> +	return folio_test_large(folio) && private &&
> +		!(private & BIT(PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER));

Is this a bug? in which case we will set PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER in
a large folio? maybe I missed some cases...

folio_test_large(folio) && private is true and
(private & BIT(PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER) is true?

> +}
> +
>  /* For compression */
>  enum compress_algorithm_type {
>  	COMPRESS_LZO,
> @@ -2682,10 +2702,57 @@ static inline int inc_valid_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  	return -ENOSPC;
>  }
>  
> +static inline unsigned long f2fs_folio_get_private_flags(const struct folio *folio)
> +{
> +	if (f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio)) {
> +		struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs = folio->private;
> +
> +		return ffs->private_flags;
> +	}
> +
> +	return (unsigned long)folio->private;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void f2fs_folio_set_private_flags(struct folio *folio,
> +						unsigned long flags)
> +{
> +	if (f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio)) {
> +		struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs = folio->private;
> +
> +		ffs->private_flags |= flags;
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!folio_test_private(folio))
> +		folio_attach_private(folio, (void *)flags);
> +	else
> +		folio->private = (void *)((unsigned long)folio->private | flags);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void f2fs_folio_clear_private_flags(struct folio *folio,
> +						 unsigned long flags)
> +{
> +	unsigned long private;
> +
> +	if (f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio)) {
> +		struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs = folio->private;
> +
> +		ffs->private_flags &= ~flags;
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	private = (unsigned long)folio->private;
> +	private &= ~flags;
> +	if (private == BIT(PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER))
> +		folio_detach_private(folio);
> +	else
> +		folio->private = (void *)private;
> +}
> +
>  #define PAGE_PRIVATE_GET_FUNC(name, flagname) \
>  static inline bool folio_test_f2fs_##name(const struct folio *folio)	\
>  {									\
> -	unsigned long priv = (unsigned long)folio->private;		\
> +	unsigned long priv = f2fs_folio_get_private_flags(folio);		\
>  	unsigned long v = (1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER) |		\
>  			     (1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_##flagname);		\
>  	return (priv & v) == v;						\
> @@ -2702,12 +2769,7 @@ static inline void folio_set_f2fs_##name(struct folio *folio)		\
>  {									\
>  	unsigned long v = (1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER) |		\
>  			     (1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_##flagname);		\
> -	if (!folio->private)						\
> -		folio_attach_private(folio, (void *)v);			\
> -	else {								\
> -		v |= (unsigned long)folio->private;			\
> -		folio->private = (void *)v;				\
> -	}								\
> +	f2fs_folio_set_private_flags(folio, v);				\
>  }									\
>  static inline void set_page_private_##name(struct page *page) \
>  { \
> @@ -2720,13 +2782,8 @@ static inline void set_page_private_##name(struct page *page) \
>  #define PAGE_PRIVATE_CLEAR_FUNC(name, flagname) \
>  static inline void folio_clear_f2fs_##name(struct folio *folio)		\
>  {									\
> -	unsigned long v = (unsigned long)folio->private;		\
> -									\
> -	v &= ~(1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_##flagname);				\
> -	if (v == (1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER))			\
> -		folio_detach_private(folio);				\
> -	else								\
> -		folio->private = (void *)v;				\
> +	f2fs_folio_clear_private_flags(folio,				\
> +			1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_##flagname);			\
>  }									\
>  static inline void clear_page_private_##name(struct page *page) \
>  { \
> @@ -2752,7 +2809,7 @@ PAGE_PRIVATE_CLEAR_FUNC(atomic, ATOMIC_WRITE);
>  
>  static inline unsigned long folio_get_f2fs_data(struct folio *folio)
>  {
> -	unsigned long data = (unsigned long)folio->private;
> +	unsigned long data = f2fs_folio_get_private_flags(folio);
>  
>  	if (!test_bit(PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER, &data))
>  		return 0;
> @@ -2763,10 +2820,7 @@ static inline void folio_set_f2fs_data(struct folio *folio, unsigned long data)
>  {
>  	data = (1UL << PAGE_PRIVATE_NOT_POINTER) | (data << PAGE_PRIVATE_MAX);
>  
> -	if (!folio_test_private(folio))
> -		folio_attach_private(folio, (void *)data);
> -	else
> -		folio->private = (void *)((unsigned long)folio->private | data);
> +	f2fs_folio_set_private_flags(folio, data);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void dec_valid_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index ed6f2947210b..df10119d94ad 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -3803,7 +3803,7 @@ static int __get_segment_type_6(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  		if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_ALIGNED_WRITE))
>  			return CURSEG_COLD_DATA_PINNED;
>  
> -		if (page_private_gcing(fio->page)) {
> +		if (folio_test_f2fs_gcing(fio->folio)) {

Shouldn't this be changed in "f2fs: make GC migration large-folio aware"?

Thanks,

>  			if (fio->sbi->am.atgc_enabled &&
>  				(fio->io_type == FS_DATA_IO) &&
>  				(fio->sbi->gc_mode != GC_URGENT_HIGH) &&



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-27  6:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-26  8:26 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 00/14] f2fs: support & optimize large folios for writable files Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26 ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-26  8:26 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 01/14] f2fs: extend folio state for large folio write path Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27  6:57   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel [this message]
2026-08-27 20:51     ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-09-04  3:44       ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-07  6:49       ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-07  9:31       ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-09 20:25         ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-08  3:41       ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-26  8:26 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 02/14] f2fs: carry subpage offset and count in write IO Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27  7:16   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-27 21:06     ` Daeho Jeong
2026-08-26  8:26 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 03/14] f2fs: support regular file buffered writes on large folios Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27  8:56   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-27 21:13     ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-07  3:51     ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 03/14] f2fs: support regular file buffered writes Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-07  6:59       ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-07 11:58     ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-07 13:03     ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-09  8:41       ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-09 20:40     ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 03/14] f2fs: support regular file buffered writes on large folios Daeho Jeong
2026-09-10 10:33       ` Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-31  3:04   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 04/14] f2fs: support atomic file large folios buffered write Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27  9:24   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 05/14] f2fs: support large folio writeback Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27 11:17   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-27 22:39     ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-04  4:04       ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-04  4:07         ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-07  3:57         ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-09 21:03           ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-07 10:12       ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-09 21:08         ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-07  3:51     ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-07  6:59       ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 06/14] f2fs: prepare mmap write faults for large folios Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27 12:36   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-28 17:18     ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-07  7:34     ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-09  7:34       ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-09 21:22         ` Daeho Jeong
2026-08-26  8:26 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 07/14] f2fs: make GC migration large-folio aware Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-28 17:20   ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-09-07 11:45     ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-09 19:33       ` Daeho Jeong
2026-08-31  3:14   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 08/14] f2fs: optimize small block size large folio read Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-31  4:21   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 09/14] f2fs: support partial uptodate " Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-26  8:26 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 10/14] f2fs: handle partial truncate of large folio dirty subpages Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-31  7:46   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26 13:09 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 11/14] f2fs: fix zeroing paths for large folios Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-31  7:56   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26 13:09 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 12/14] f2fs: handle block cloning within the same large folio Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-31  8:19   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-07  9:57     ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-07 10:24       ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26 13:09 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 13/14] f2fs: allow large folio support to writeable files Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-28 17:44   ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-07  6:33     ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-09 19:23       ` Daeho Jeong
2026-08-31  8:31   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-07 11:14     ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-26 13:09 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 14/14] f2fs: make compressed files compatible with large folio Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-28 17:52   ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-07  3:45     ` Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-31  8:46   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=22b18f2e-70f5-4292-b83e-8f6c374a627d@kernel.org \
    --to=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=David.Hildenbrand@arm.com \
    --cc=Dev.Jain@arm.com \
    --cc=Ryan.Roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jyescas@google.com \
    --cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lipengfei28@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=nzzhao@126.com \
    --cc=zhangbo56@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.