All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Nanzhe Zhao <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Juan Yescas <jyescas@google.com>,
	Dev Jain <Dev.Jain@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Hildenbrand <David.Hildenbrand@arm.com>,
	Bo Zhang <zhangbo56@xiaomi.com>,
	Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
	Nanzhe Zhao <nzzhao@126.com>, Pengfei Li <lipengfei28@xiaomi.com>,
	Ryan Roberts <Ryan.Roberts@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 07/14] f2fs: make GC migration large-folio aware
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 11:14:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45c09edb-138c-4d78-a6aa-c50dfa73cead@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260826082641.2007658-8-zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>

On 8/26/26 16:26, Nanzhe Zhao wrote:
> GC can operate on a 4K block that is cached inside a large folio.
> The data lookup helpers therefore need to test and update uptodate
> state for the addressed subpage instead of rejecting large folios or
> treating the whole folio as the target block.
> 
> Let f2fs_get_read_data_folio(), f2fs_find_data_folio(), and
> f2fs_get_lock_data_folio() to use subpage uptodate state. Submit
> single-block reads at the requested folio offset and zero only the
> addressed 4K range for NEW_ADDR.
> 
> Also update `move_data_page` to mark, clear, and restore dirty
> state for the target subpage, and submit write I/O with the subpage
> offset recorded in f2fs_io_info.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nanzhe Zhao <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>
> ---
>   fs/f2fs/data.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>   fs/f2fs/f2fs.h |  6 ++--
>   fs/f2fs/gc.c   | 30 ++++++++++++++--
>   3 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index 608d8ea8e607..0e54b1e25893 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -1241,19 +1241,31 @@ static struct bio *f2fs_grab_read_bio(struct inode *inode,
>   
>   /* This can handle encryption stuffs */
>   static void f2fs_submit_page_read(struct inode *inode, struct fsverity_info *vi,
> -				  struct folio *folio, block_t blkaddr,
> -				  blk_opf_t op_flags, bool for_write)
> +				  struct folio *folio, pgoff_t index,
> +				  block_t blkaddr, blk_opf_t op_flags,
> +				  bool for_write)
>   {
>   	struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
>   	struct bio *bio;
> +	size_t offset = 0;
>   
> -	bio = f2fs_grab_read_bio(inode, vi, blkaddr, 1, op_flags, folio->index,
> +	if (f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio)) {
> +		struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs = folio->private;
> +		unsigned long flags;
> +
> +		offset = offset_in_folio(folio, (loff_t)index << PAGE_SHIFT);



> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
> +		ffs->read_pages_pending++;
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
> +	}

How about wrapping this to a function, and use it to clean up the codes.

f2fs_update_read_folio_pending(, pages)

> +
> +	bio = f2fs_grab_read_bio(inode, vi, blkaddr, 1, op_flags, index,
>   				 for_write);
>   
>   	/* wait for GCed page writeback via META_MAPPING */
>   	f2fs_wait_on_block_writeback(inode, blkaddr);
>   
> -	if (!bio_add_folio(bio, folio, PAGE_SIZE, 0))
> +	if (!bio_add_folio(bio, folio, PAGE_SIZE, offset))
>   		f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
>   
>   	inc_page_count(sbi, F2FS_RD_DATA);
> @@ -1399,21 +1411,13 @@ struct folio *f2fs_get_read_data_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
>   	struct dnode_of_data dn;
>   	struct folio *folio;
>   	int err;
> -retry:
> +
>   	folio = f2fs_grab_cache_folio(mapping, index, for_write);
>   	if (IS_ERR(folio))
>   		return folio;
>   
> -	if (folio_test_large(folio)) {
> -		pgoff_t folio_index = mapping_align_index(mapping, index);
> -		unsigned long nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> -
> -		f2fs_folio_put(folio, true);
> -		invalidate_inode_pages2_range(mapping, folio_index,
> -				folio_index + nr_pages - 1);
> -		f2fs_schedule_timeout(DEFAULT_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
> -		goto retry;
> -	}
> +	if (folio_test_large(folio))
> +		f2fs_ffs_find_or_alloc(folio);
>   
>   	if (f2fs_lookup_read_extent_cache_block(inode, index,
>   						&dn.data_blkaddr)) {
> @@ -1448,7 +1452,7 @@ struct folio *f2fs_get_read_data_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
>   		goto put_err;
>   	}
>   got_it:
> -	if (folio_test_uptodate(folio)) {
> +	if (f2fs_ffs_test_blk_uptodate(folio, index)) {
>   		folio_unlock(folio);
>   		return folio;
>   	}
> @@ -1461,15 +1465,17 @@ struct folio *f2fs_get_read_data_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
>   	 * f2fs_init_inode_metadata.
>   	 */
>   	if (dn.data_blkaddr == NEW_ADDR) {
> -		folio_zero_segment(folio, 0, folio_size(folio));
> -		if (!folio_test_uptodate(folio))
> -			folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> +		size_t offset = offset_in_folio(folio,
> +						(loff_t)index << PAGE_SHIFT);
> +
> +		folio_zero_segment(folio, offset, offset + PAGE_SIZE);
> +		f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_uptodate(folio, offset, PAGE_SIZE);
>   		folio_unlock(folio);
>   		return folio;
>   	}
>   
> -	f2fs_submit_page_read(inode, f2fs_need_verity(inode, folio->index),
> -			      folio, dn.data_blkaddr, op_flags, for_write);
> +	f2fs_submit_page_read(inode, f2fs_need_verity(inode, index),
> +			      folio, index, dn.data_blkaddr, op_flags, for_write);
>   	return folio;
>   
>   put_err:
> @@ -1486,7 +1492,7 @@ struct folio *f2fs_find_data_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
>   	folio = f2fs_filemap_get_folio(mapping, index, FGP_ACCESSED, 0);
>   	if (IS_ERR(folio))
>   		goto read;
> -	if (folio_test_uptodate(folio))
> +	if (f2fs_ffs_test_blk_uptodate(folio, index))
>   		return folio;
>   	f2fs_folio_put(folio, false);
>   
> @@ -1495,11 +1501,11 @@ struct folio *f2fs_find_data_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
>   	if (IS_ERR(folio))
>   		return folio;
>   
> -	if (folio_test_uptodate(folio))
> +	if (f2fs_ffs_test_blk_uptodate(folio, index))
>   		return folio;
>   
>   	folio_wait_locked(folio);
> -	if (unlikely(!folio_test_uptodate(folio))) {
> +	if (unlikely(!f2fs_ffs_test_blk_uptodate(folio, index))) {
>   		f2fs_folio_put(folio, false);
>   		return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
>   	}
> @@ -1523,7 +1529,8 @@ struct folio *f2fs_get_lock_data_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
>   
>   	/* wait for read completion */
>   	folio_lock(folio);
> -	if (unlikely(folio->mapping != mapping || !folio_test_uptodate(folio))) {
> +	if (unlikely(folio->mapping != mapping ||
> +		    !f2fs_ffs_test_blk_uptodate(folio, index))) {
>   		f2fs_folio_put(folio, true);
>   		return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
>   	}
> @@ -2681,6 +2688,23 @@ static void f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_uptodate(struct folio *folio, size_t offset,
>   		folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
>   }
>   
> +bool f2fs_ffs_test_blk_dirty(const struct folio *folio, pgoff_t index)
> +{
> +	struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs;
> +	unsigned int idx, nr_subpages;
> +
> +	if (!f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio))
> +		return folio_test_dirty(folio);
> +
> +	if (!folio_contains(folio, index))
> +		return false;

Can we change this to a sanity check?

> +
> +	ffs = folio->private;
> +	nr_subpages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> +	idx = index - folio->index;
> +	return test_bit(nr_subpages + idx, ffs->state);
> +}
> +
>   void f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_dirty(struct folio *folio,
>   				    size_t offset, size_t len)
>   {
> @@ -2719,18 +2743,30 @@ static bool __ffs_clear_subrange_dirty(struct folio *folio,
>   			2 * nr_subpages;
>   }
>   
> -void f2fs_ffs_clear_subrange_dirty(struct folio *folio, size_t offset, size_t len)
> +/**
> + * f2fs_ffs_clear_subrange_dirty - clear the dirty bits of a folio subrange
> + * @folio: the large folio
> + * @offset: start byte offset within the folio
> + * @len: byte length of the subrange
> + *
> + * Clear the dirty bits of the 4K subpages covered by [offset, offset + len),
> + * and return whether the folio still has any dirty subpage left.
> + */
> +bool f2fs_ffs_clear_subrange_dirty(struct folio *folio, size_t offset,
> +				   size_t len)
>   {
>   	struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs;
>   	unsigned long flags;
> +	bool dirty;
>   
>   	if (!f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio))
> -		return;
> +		return false;
>   
> -	ffs = (struct f2fs_folio_state *)folio->private;
> +	ffs = folio->private;
>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
> -	__ffs_clear_subrange_dirty(folio, ffs, offset, len);
> +	dirty = __ffs_clear_subrange_dirty(folio, ffs, offset, len);
>   	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
> +	return dirty;
>   }
>   
>   static unsigned int ffs_next_dirty_subpage(struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs,
> @@ -4853,7 +4889,7 @@ static int f2fs_write_begin(const struct kiocb *iocb,
>   		 */
>   		f2fs_submit_page_read(inode,
>   				      NULL, /* can't write to fsverity files */
> -				      folio, blkaddr, 0, true);
> +				      folio, index, blkaddr, 0, true);
>   
>   		folio_lock(folio);
>   		if (unlikely(folio->mapping != mapping)) {
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index 71e6d7e34c7b..0ffbe2bd04c8 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -4344,10 +4344,10 @@ int f2fs_write_single_data_page(struct folio *folio, int *submitted,
>   				int compr_blocks, bool allow_balance);
>   bool f2fs_ffs_test_blk_uptodate(const struct folio *folio, pgoff_t index);
>   struct f2fs_folio_state *f2fs_ffs_find_or_alloc(struct folio *folio);
> +bool f2fs_ffs_test_blk_dirty(const struct folio *folio, pgoff_t index);
>   void f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_dirty(struct folio *folio, size_t offset, size_t len);
> -bool f2fs_ffs_clear_subrange_dirty_and_test(struct folio *folio, size_t offset,
> -					size_t len);
> -void f2fs_ffs_clear_subrange_dirty(struct folio *folio, size_t offset, size_t len);
> +bool f2fs_ffs_clear_subrange_dirty(struct folio *folio, size_t offset,
> +				   size_t len);
>   void f2fs_write_failed(struct inode *inode, loff_t to);
>   void f2fs_invalidate_folio(struct folio *folio, size_t offset, size_t length);
>   bool f2fs_release_folio(struct folio *folio, gfp_t wait);
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> index 0c17038fcfd7..42e6dfcbf98d 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> @@ -1504,12 +1504,19 @@ static int move_data_page(struct inode *inode, block_t bidx, int gc_type,
>   						unsigned int segno, int off)
>   {
>   	struct folio *folio;
> +	size_t foff = 0;
> +	bool large = false;
>   	int err = 0;
>   
>   	folio = f2fs_get_lock_data_folio(inode, bidx, true);
>   	if (IS_ERR(folio))
>   		return PTR_ERR(folio);
>   
> +	if (f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio)) {
> +		large = true;
> +		foff = offset_in_folio(folio, (loff_t)bidx << PAGE_SHIFT);
> +	}
> +
>   	if (!check_valid_map(F2FS_I_SB(inode), segno, off)) {
>   		err = -ENOENT;
>   		goto out;
> @@ -1524,6 +1531,8 @@ static int move_data_page(struct inode *inode, block_t bidx, int gc_type,
>   			err = -EAGAIN;
>   			goto out;
>   		}
> +		if (large)
> +			f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_dirty(folio, foff, PAGE_SIZE);
>   		folio_mark_dirty(folio);
>   		folio_set_f2fs_gcing(folio);
>   	} else {
> @@ -1536,32 +1545,49 @@ static int move_data_page(struct inode *inode, block_t bidx, int gc_type,
>   			.op_flags = REQ_SYNC,
>   			.old_blkaddr = NULL_ADDR,
>   			.folio = folio,
> +			.folio_offset = bidx - folio->index,
> +			.folio_blkcnt = 1,
>   			.encrypted_page = NULL,
>   			.need_lock = LOCK_REQ,
>   			.io_type = FS_GC_DATA_IO,
>   		};
> -		bool is_dirty = folio_test_dirty(folio);
> +		struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs = NULL;
> +		bool is_dirty = f2fs_ffs_test_blk_dirty(folio, bidx);
>   
>   retry:
>   		f2fs_folio_wait_writeback(folio, DATA, true, true);
>   
> +		if (large) {
> +			ffs = folio->private;
> +			f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_dirty(folio, foff, PAGE_SIZE);
> +		}
>   		folio_mark_dirty(folio);
>   		if (folio_clear_dirty_for_io(folio)) {
>   			inode_dec_dirty_pages(inode);
>   			f2fs_remove_dirty_inode(inode);
> +			if (large &&
> +			    f2fs_ffs_clear_subrange_dirty(folio, foff, PAGE_SIZE))
> +				folio_mark_dirty(folio);

Why do we need to mark folio dirty again after clearing dirty?

Thanks,

>   		}
>   
> +		if (large)
> +			atomic_inc(&ffs->write_pages_pending);
>   		folio_set_f2fs_gcing(folio);
>   
>   		err = f2fs_do_write_data_page(&fio);
>   		if (err) {
>   			folio_clear_f2fs_gcing(folio);
> +			if (large)
> +				atomic_dec(&ffs->write_pages_pending);
>   			if (err == -ENOMEM) {
>   				memalloc_retry_wait(GFP_NOFS);
>   				goto retry;
>   			}
> -			if (is_dirty)
> +			if (is_dirty) {
> +				if (large)
> +					f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_dirty(folio, foff, PAGE_SIZE);
>   				folio_mark_dirty(folio);
> +			}
>   		}
>   	}
>   out:



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-31  3:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-26  8:26 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 00/14] f2fs: support & optimize large folios for writable files Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26 ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-26  8:26 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 01/14] f2fs: extend folio state for large folio write path Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27  6:57   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-27 20:51     ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-04  3:44       ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-07  6:49       ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-07  9:31       ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-09 20:25         ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-08  3:41       ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-26  8:26 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 02/14] f2fs: carry subpage offset and count in write IO Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27  7:16   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-27 21:06     ` Daeho Jeong
2026-08-26  8:26 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 03/14] f2fs: support regular file buffered writes on large folios Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27  8:56   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-27 21:13     ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-07  3:51     ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 03/14] f2fs: support regular file buffered writes Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-07  6:59       ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-07 11:58     ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-07 13:03     ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-09  8:41       ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-09 20:40     ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 03/14] f2fs: support regular file buffered writes on large folios Daeho Jeong
2026-09-10 10:33       ` Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-31  3:04   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 04/14] f2fs: support atomic file large folios buffered write Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27  9:24   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 05/14] f2fs: support large folio writeback Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27 11:17   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-27 22:39     ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-04  4:04       ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-04  4:07         ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-07  3:57         ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-09 21:03           ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-07 10:12       ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-09 21:08         ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-07  3:51     ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-07  6:59       ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 06/14] f2fs: prepare mmap write faults for large folios Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27 12:36   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-28 17:18     ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-07  7:34     ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-09  7:34       ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-09 21:22         ` Daeho Jeong
2026-08-26  8:26 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 07/14] f2fs: make GC migration large-folio aware Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-28 17:20   ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-09-07 11:45     ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-09 19:33       ` Daeho Jeong
2026-08-31  3:14   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel [this message]
2026-08-26  8:26 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 08/14] f2fs: optimize small block size large folio read Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-31  4:21   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 09/14] f2fs: support partial uptodate " Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-26  8:26 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 10/14] f2fs: handle partial truncate of large folio dirty subpages Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26  8:26   ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-31  7:46   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26 13:09 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 11/14] f2fs: fix zeroing paths for large folios Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-31  7:56   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26 13:09 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 12/14] f2fs: handle block cloning within the same large folio Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-31  8:19   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-07  9:57     ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-07 10:24       ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-26 13:09 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 13/14] f2fs: allow large folio support to writeable files Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-28 17:44   ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-07  6:33     ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-09 19:23       ` Daeho Jeong
2026-08-31  8:31   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-09-07 11:14     ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-26 13:09 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 14/14] f2fs: make compressed files compatible with large folio Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-28 17:52   ` Daeho Jeong
2026-09-07  3:45     ` Nanzhe Zhao via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-08-31  8:46   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45c09edb-138c-4d78-a6aa-c50dfa73cead@kernel.org \
    --to=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=David.Hildenbrand@arm.com \
    --cc=Dev.Jain@arm.com \
    --cc=Ryan.Roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jyescas@google.com \
    --cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lipengfei28@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=nzzhao@126.com \
    --cc=zhangbo56@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.